scholarly journals The what, who and how of socio-ecological justice: Tailoring a new justice model for earth system law

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 100124
Author(s):  
Kamila Pope ◽  
Michelle Bonatti ◽  
Stefan Sieber
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Louis J. Kotzé ◽  
Rakhyun E. Kim

It seems international environmental law cannot continue to exist in its present form for the purpose of the Anthropocene. Analytically, international environmental law and its lawyers appear not to fully understand and respond to the complex governance challenges arising from a complex Earth system. Thus, normatively, international environmental law seems to have failed to provide appropriate norms to prevent humans from encroaching on Earth system limits. In a transformative sense, international environmental law has not been sufficiently ambitious to achieve the type of radical transformations that may be necessary to ensure planetary integrity and socio-ecological justice. It calls for a new legal paradigm suitable for the purpose of the Anthropocene and could address international environmental law’s analytical, normative and transformative concerns. This new paradigm may be called the ‘Earth system law’. This chapter seeks to provide some preliminary thoughts about the analytical, normative, and transformative dimensions of earth system law could entail. Why they would be more appropriate for the purpose of governing a complex Earth system in the Anthropocene?


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis J. Kotzé ◽  
Rakhyun E. Kim

In this article we argue that international environmental law cannot continue to exist in its present form for the purpose of the Anthropocene. We show that analytically, international environmental law and its lawyers are unable to fully understand and respond to the complex governance challenges arising from a complex Earth system. Normatively, international environmental law has failed to provide appropriate norms to prevent humans from encroaching on Earth system limits. In a transformative sense, international environmental law has not been sufficiently ambitious to achieve the type of radical transformations necessary to ensure planetary integrity and socio-ecological justice. We need a new legal paradigm that is better suited for the purpose of the Anthropocene that must address international environmental law’s analytical, normative and transformative concerns. We call this new paradigm earth system law. Building on our recent work, we offer here some preliminary thoughts about what we think the analytical, normative, and transformative dimensions of earth system law could and should entail, and why they would be more appropriate for the purpose of governing a complex Earth system in the Anthropocene.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Chanenson
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunqiang ZHU ◽  
Jiulin SUN ◽  
Shunbao LIAO ◽  
Yapeng YANG ◽  
Huazhong ZHU ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunqiang ZHU ◽  
Min FENG ◽  
Jia SONG ◽  
Runda LIU

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faten Attig-Bahar ◽  
Rondrotiana Barimalala ◽  
Victor Nnamdi Dike ◽  
Jo-Ting Huang-Lachmann ◽  
Gaby Langendijk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document