scholarly journals The interplay of pineal hormones and socioeconomic status leading to colorectal cancer disparity

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 101330
Author(s):  
Talaijha Haynes ◽  
Gabriela Oprea-Ilies ◽  
Upender Manne ◽  
Rajesh Singh ◽  
Shailesh Singh ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (15) ◽  
pp. 2681-2695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieke J. Aarts ◽  
Valery E.P.P. Lemmens ◽  
Marieke W.J. Louwman ◽  
Anton E. Kunst ◽  
Jan Willem W. Coebergh

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. S29-S35
Author(s):  
Kaitlin M. McGrew ◽  
Jennifer D. Peck ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Amanda E. Janitz ◽  
Cuyler A. Snider ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2628-2636 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. van den Berg ◽  
S. Buettner ◽  
R. R. J. Coebergh van den Braak ◽  
K. H. J. Ultee ◽  
H. F. Lingsma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with early mortality in cancer patients. However, the association between SES and outcome in colorectal cancer patients is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SES is associated with short- and long-term outcome in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods Patients who underwent curative surgery in the region of Rotterdam for stage I–III colorectal cancer between January 2007 and July 2014 were included. Gross household income and survival status were obtained from a national registry provided by Statistics Netherlands Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Patients were assigned percentiles according to the national income distribution. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed to assess the association of SES with 30-day postoperative complications, overall survival and cancer-specific survival, adjusted for known prognosticators. Results For 965 of the 975 eligible patients (99%), gross household income could be retrieved. Patients with a lower SES more often had diabetes, more often underwent an open surgical procedure, and had more comorbidities. In addition, patients with a lower SES were less likely to receive (neo) adjuvant treatment. Lower SES was independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications (Odds ratio per percent increase 0.99, 95%CI 0.99–0.998, p = 0.004) and lower cancer-specific mortality (Hazard ratio per percent increase 0.99, 95%CI 0.98–0.99, p = 0.009). Conclusion This study shows that lower SES is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications, and poor cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing surgery for stage I–III colorectal cancer after correcting for known prognosticators.


Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 118 (14) ◽  
pp. 3636-3644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chyke A. Doubeni ◽  
Adeyinka O. Laiyemo ◽  
Jacqueline M. Major ◽  
Mario Schootman ◽  
Min Lian ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Jandova ◽  
Eric Ohlson ◽  
Maria Rocio Torres, ​B.S. ◽  
Ryan DiGiovanni ◽  
Viraj Pandit ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 352 (9138) ◽  
pp. 1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
MV Ionescu ◽  
F Carey ◽  
IS Tait ◽  
RJC Steele

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee S. James ◽  
Sandra Hall ◽  
K. Allen Greiner ◽  
Dan Buckles ◽  
Wendi K. Born ◽  
...  

Purpose. Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective, but only one-half of age-eligible adults adhere to national guidelines. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups are less likely to be screened. Methods. Baseline data from a prospective study were used to examine the associations among CRC screening screening barriers, and SES. A convenience sample of adults (N = 291) aged 40 years and older was recruited from a federally qualified health center. Questionnaires were administered orally and included demographics, health, health behavior, and screening barriers. Results. In logistic regression, having health insurance was associated with greater odds of screening. Bivariate analyses detected few differences in fecal occult blood test (FOBT) barriers, but several endoscopy barriers were more common among the lowest SES groups. For example, fear of injury from endoscopy was more likely among low-income and uninsured participants. Discussion. The impact of SES on cancer screening is complex, but low-SES participants more often reported certain barriers than their higher-SES counterparts. This was more evident for endoscopy than for FOBT. Programs targeted at low-SES patients may need to focus on barriers that are not fully addressed in traditional promotion efforts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document