scholarly journals It’s time to reenvision the faculty hiring process

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (37) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Chemjobber, special to C&EN
2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1954-1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Román Liera

This study applies cultural historical activity theory to examine the experiences of 17 professors at a religiously affiliated private university who participated in a 10-month, inquiry-based intervention to change their culture around faculty hiring. The findings illustrate that professors who use race-conscious language and tools to interrogate their campus culture’s historical roots with racism rethought their hiring process. In doing so, faculty perceived racial equity work as an action-oriented, organizational effort to use equity-minded language and create a more equitable hiring structure. The study contributes to the literature on organizational change for racial equity by identifying faculty experiences with racism and critical knowledge about the organizational culture mediating faculty learning and agency.


2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
ÖZLEM SENSOY ◽  
ROBIN DiANGELO

Despite stated commitments to diversity, predominantly White academic institutions still have not increased racial diversity among their faculty. In this article Robin DiAngelo and Özlem Sensoy focus on one entry point for doing so—the faculty hiring process. They analyze a typical faculty hiring scenario and identify the most common practices that block the hiring of diverse faculty and protect Whiteness and offer constructive alternative practices to guide hiring committees in their work to realize the institution's commitment to diversity.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0185900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Miuccio ◽  
Ka-yuet Liu ◽  
Hakwan Lau ◽  
Megan A. K. Peters

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
KerryAnn O’Meara ◽  
Dawn Culpepper ◽  
Lindsey L. Templeton

This narrative and integrative literature review synthesizes the literature on when, where, and how the faculty hiring process used in most American higher education settings operates with implicit and cognitive bias. The literature review analyzes the “four phases” of the faculty hiring process, drawing on theories from behavioral economics and social psychology. The results show that although much research establishes the presence of bias in hiring, relatively few studies examine interventions or “nudges” that might be used to mitigate bias and encourage the recruitment and hiring of faculty identified as women and/or faculty identified as being from an underrepresented minority group. This article subsequently makes recommendations for historical, quasi-experimental, and randomized studies to test hiring interventions with larger databases and more controlled conditions than have previously been used, with the goal of establishing evidence-based practices that contribute to a more inclusive hiring process and a more diverse faculty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy A. Boysen ◽  
Jordan Morton ◽  
Tatiana Nieves

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document