Role Conflict, Role Ambiguity, and School Principals’ Job Robustness

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Eisenhauer ◽  
Donald J. Willower ◽  
Joseph W. Licata
Author(s):  
Jeevan Khanal ◽  
Subekshya Ghimire

In the context of developed countries, a lot of research has been done to uncover and identify the problems school leaders face in their work but little is known about the school leadership of underdeveloped countries. In a quest to discover contextual problems in terms of role conflict and role ambiguity of school leaders, this qualitative study tries to capture the experiences of principals in Nepal through in-depth interviews of six community school principals. The findings reveal that the major sources of role conflict and ambiguity for principals from Nepal are problematic power-sharing, low job autonomy, dual role conflict, limited professional development training, and lack of leadership knowledge. The study has several policy-level implications such as importance of hiring principals with proven leadership skills and increasing the leadership skills of current principals to ensure that they can tackle these challenges.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mainville ◽  
A. Boucher ◽  
J. Bolduc-Teasdale ◽  
A.-M. Gagnon ◽  
M.-C. Laughrea ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elena Baixauli ◽  
Ángela Beleña ◽  
Amelia Díaz

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of a workplace bullying intervention based on the training of middle managers regarding bullying awareness, the consequences of bullying, strategies in conflict resolution and mediation/negotiation abilities. Overall, 142 randomly selected middle managers participated in the study. First, participants completed an information record and two scales assessing bullying strategies, role conflict and role ambiguity. The last two scales were completed again in a second phase three months after the intervention had finished. The intervention produced a decrease in the following bullying strategies: effects on self-expression and communication, effects on personal reputation and effects on occupational situation and quality of life, with all of the mentioned bullying strategies being suffered by part of the sample. In addition, the conflict role decreased in the group which received the intervention. Moreover, the decrease in the effects of the bullying strategy effects on occupational situation and quality of life was especially important in managers with higher responsibilities within the workplace. Results are discussed in the framework that (1) leadership practices and, more specifically, conflict resolution skills are strongly responsible for bullying at work; and (2) the importance of intervening in the early stages of the bullying process as a key element in the correction, but also as a potential prevention element, of bullying in the workplace.


1982 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-562
Author(s):  
Clair Agriesti-Johnson ◽  
Elizabeth Miles

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Víctor E Olivares-Faúndez ◽  
Pedro R. Gil-Monte ◽  
Luis Mena ◽  
Carolina Jélvez-Wilke ◽  
Hugo Figueiredo-Ferraz

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-137
Author(s):  
Brittany L. Jacobs ◽  
Claire C. Zvosec ◽  
Brent D. Oja

This phenomenological study seeks to better understand the role of the referee in the Olympic sporting structure and to deconstruct the apparent dichotomies that exist within this role. Eleven rugby sevens referees each completed a pre and post interview for a total of twenty-two interviews. From the data, four sources of role ambiguity or conflict emerged; (1) remaining unnoticed vs. media exposure; (2) the team vs. individualistic nature of officiating; (3) being a judge vs. being an athlete, and (4) amateurism vs. professionalism. This study discusses how these dichotomies highlight the major sources of role ambiguity and role conflict for rugby sevens officials within the larger Olympic context. Implications regarding increased role clarity, reduced role strain, and referee management are discussed.   


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahtiar Effendi

This study aims to examine the effect of role conflict, role ambiguity, and auditor independence on auditor performance. This type of research is quantitative research. The sampling technique was purposive sampling with a sample of 35 respondents from 14 Public Accounting Firms in the Jakarta. The data analysis technique used in this study is a multiple linear regression using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 24 program. The results show that: role conflict does not affect auditor performance, role ambiguity does not affect auditor performance, and auditor independence do not affect auditor performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document