scholarly journals Using a brief web-based 5A intervention to improve weight management in primary care: results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska D. Welzel ◽  
Jonathan Bär ◽  
Janine Stein ◽  
Margrit Löbner ◽  
Alexander Pabst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Obesity Management ◽  
Online Tutorial ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Background The primary health care setting is considered a major starting point in successful obesity management. However, research indicates insufficient quality of weight counseling in primary care. Aim of the present study was to implement and evaluate a 5A online tutorial aimed at improving weight management and provider-patient-interaction in primary health care. The online tutorial is a stand-alone low-threshold minimal e-health intervention for general practitioners based on the 5As guidance for obesity management by the Canadian Obesity Network. Methods In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, 50 primary care practices included 160 patients aged 18 to 60 years with obesity (BMI ≥ 30). The intervention practices had continuous access to the 5A online tutorial for the general practitioner. Patients of control practices were treated as usual. Primary outcome was the patients’ perspective of the doctor-patient-interaction regarding obesity management, assessed with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care before and after (6/12 months) the training. Treatment effects over time (intention-to-treat) were evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression models. Results More than half of the physicians (57%) wished for more training offers on obesity counseling. The 5A online tutorial was completed by 76% of the physicians in the intervention practices. Results of the mixed-effects regression analysis showed no treatment effect at 6 months and 12 months’ follow-up for the PACIC 5A sum score. Patients with obesity in the intervention group scored lower on self-stigma and readiness for weight management compared to participants in the control group at 6 months’ follow-up. However, there were no significant group differences for weight, quality of life, readiness to engage in weight management, self-stigma and depression at 12 months’ follow-up. Conclusion To our knowledge, the present study provides the first long-term results for a 5A-based intervention in the context of the German primary care setting. The results suggest that a stand-alone low-threshold minimal e-health intervention for general practitioners does not improve weight management in the long term. To improve weight management in primary care, more comprehensive strategies are needed. However, due to recruitment difficulties the final sample was smaller than intended. This may have contributed to the null results. Trial registration The study has been registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Identifier: DRKS00009241, Registered 3 February 2016).

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Brief Intervention for Promoting Mental Health among Employees in Social Enterprises: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedicte Deforche ◽  
Jasmine Mommen ◽  
Anne Hublet ◽  
Winnie De Roover ◽  
Nele Huys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Promotion ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Evidence on the effectiveness of workplace mental health promotion for people with disabilities is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief mental health promotion intervention in social enterprises. It had a non-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial design with follow-up one and four months after the intervention. In total 196 employees agreed to participate (86 intervention and 110 control). Empowerment was the main outcome; secondary outcomes were resilience, palliative behavior, determinants of four coping strategies of mental health, quality of life, and life satisfaction. A brief participant satisfaction survey was conducted after the intervention. No significant intervention effect on empowerment was found. However, at one month follow-up, significant favorable effects were found on perceived social support for coping strategies for mental health and on palliative behavior. At four months follow-up, favorable intervention effects were found on quality of life, but unfavorable effects were found on unjustified worrying. In addition, the intervention was well received by the employees. This brief intervention might be a promising first step to improve mental health in people with disabilities working in social enterprises. Nevertheless, additional monitoring by professionals and managers working in the organizations might be needed to maintain these effects.

Obesity management by general practitioners: the unavoidable necessity

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Jansen ◽  
Ben Desbrow ◽  
Lauren Ball
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
National Health ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Obesity Management ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Insufficient Time

Nearly 62% of primary care patients are overweight or obese, and obesity is now a National Health Priority Area. Weight management interventions in primary care currently generate little more than 1 kg of weight loss per patient over a 2-year period. Consequently, further strategies are required to improve the effectiveness of weight management in primary care. The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) have released updated guidelines for the management of overweight and obese patients in primary care. However, there is some disconnect between establishment of guidelines and their implementation in practice. Barriers to GPs using guidelines for the management of obesity include low self-efficacy, perceived insufficient time in consultations and the challenge of raising the topic of a patient’s weight. Nonetheless, patients prefer to receive weight management support from GPs rather than other health professionals, suggesting that the demand on GPs to support patients in weight management will continue. GPs cannot afford to side-line obesity management, as obesity is likely to be the most prevalent modifiable risk factor associated with patients’ long-term health. Without further strategies to support GPs in their management of patients’ weight, obesity will continue to be an expensive and long-term public health issue.

Colorectal cancer nutritional and quality-of-life parameters predict patients outcomes after radiotherapy: Long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized controlled trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14570-14570
Author(s):  
P. Ravasco ◽  
I. Monteiro Grillo ◽  
M. Camilo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Disease Outcome ◽  
Nutritional Counseling ◽  
Diet Intake

14570 Background: Long term data of our published randomized trial of nutritional therapy in colorectal cancer showed that nutritional counseling optimizes pts prognosis. This study aimed to search whether outcomes were affected by individual nutritional & Quality of Life (QoL) parameters after nutrition intervention and radiotherapy (RT). Methods: Data were obtained from the trial pts’ records: G1 (n=37) on individualized nutritional counseling & education (regular foods), G2 (n=37) ad lib+polymeric protein supplements & G3 (n=37) ad lib intake. After RT, current intake (diet history), nutritional status (PG-SGA) & QoL scores (EORTC) were evaluated; their ability to predict survival, disease outcome [loco regional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases] & late RT toxicity (permanent flatulence, abdominal distension, diarrhea) were analyzed after a median follow-up of 3.7 (2.0–5.8) yrs. Results: Energy/protein intakes had decreased in G3 (p<0.01) & increased in G1>G2, p=0.007; wasting only occurred in G3>G2 (p<0.05); QoL scores worsened in G3>G2 (p<0.05) yet improved in G1, p<0.01. On multivariate analyzis of coded time-dependent variables: poorer diet intake, nutritional wasting & worse QoL scores were associated with decreased survival (p<0.002), LRR (p=0.01), distant metastases (p=0.005) & late RT toxicity, p<0.003. Landmark analysis showed that pts with nutritional intake/status & QoL deterioration, had significantly lower survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.25; 95% CI 2.74–26.47; p<0.001), worse disease outcome (HR: 8.15; 95% CI 2.22–25.40; p<0.002) & more severe late RT toxicity (HR: 7.15; 95% CI 2.25–16.11; p<0.004). Conclusions: In colorectal cancer after RT, poor diet intake, wasting & deteriorated QoL look as if significant predictors of survival, treatment response & late RT toxicity; such patients are prone to a more aggressive clinical course. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An Eight-year Follow-up to a Randomized Clinical Trial of Participant Satisfaction with Three Types of Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures

2004 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 630-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Timmerman ◽  
G.T. Stoker ◽  
D. Wismeijer ◽  
P. Oosterveld ◽  
J.I.J.F. Vermeeren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Participant Satisfaction ◽  
Chewing Ability ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture

Studies have shown that mandibular implant overdentures significantly increase satisfaction and quality of life of edentulous elders. Improved chewing ability appears to have a positive impact on nutritional state. Therefore, it is important to determine the best design of this prosthesis over the long term. In this randomized controlled trial, three groups of edentulous participants with atrophic mandibles wore 3 types of implant overdentures. During an eight-year follow-up, only seven of the 110 participants had dropped out of this study. Almost all participants were still satisfied with their overdentures. Participant satisfaction concerning retention and stability of the mandibular overdenture had decreased significantly in the two-implant ball attachment group, whereas the opinion of participants in the single- and triple-bar groups was still at the same level. The long-term results suggest that a mandibular overdenture retained by 2 implants with a single bar may be the best treatment strategy for edentulous people with atrophic ridges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document