The Effect of Innovation Complexity on Innovation Implementation Process: The JD-R Model Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-80
Author(s):  
Se Yeon Choi ◽  
Hyejin Moon
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeta Baporikar

Innovations are vital to most organizations especially in this competitive and globalized scenario. Nevertheless, the results of innovations are in many cases far from satisfactory. Several studies have shown that an organization's failure to benefit from an adopted innovation can often be attributed to a deficient implementation process rather than to the innovation itself. Thus, the implementation process is a critical interface between the decision to adopt and the routine usage of an innovation. Ways and methods to implement innovation effectively have been under scholarship for some time now. Despite the number of studies which identify multiple causes of unsuccessful implementation processes, literature is lacking regarding the crucial aspects of innovation implementation. Building on the derived knowledge of the underlying dynamics of innovation processes, through grounded theory and in-depth literature review, the present study aims to contribute to existing implementation literature by examining the strategic facets of innovation implementation.


Author(s):  
Gennadiy Dmitrovic Koltun ◽  
Carlos Alberto Romero Viturro ◽  
Johan Buchholz ◽  
Juliane Wissel ◽  
Michael Zaggl ◽  
...  

AbstractIt is estimated that about half of all innovations, such as innovations in mechatronic product-service systems (PSS), fail to deliver the expected benefits to the adopting organization. Different studies point out that one of the main reasons for this is an ineffective implementation process.In this paper, we argue that, apart from several organizational challenges, insufficient integration of technical and social aspects is one of the reasons for ineffective innovation implementation in the environment of mechatronic PSS.In order to remedy this weakness, this paper builds on the work of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Experts from technical, socio-technical, and management fields integrate their work within a conceptual innovation implementation management system (IIMS). This IIMS is capable of capturing various methods and models that foster the socio-technical integration in mechatronic PSS. The approach is assessed in a lab-scale demonstration case that is representative of industrial environments.The presented approach supports an effective innovation implementation process, while the IIMS facilitates individual alignments for future practitioners.


Author(s):  
Hari Nugraha

Innovation is a need for organizations to improve service and performance. Puslatbang PKASN LAN develops the innovation called by one-stop e-office. One-stop e-office are the programs that consist of a website integration program; the official correspondence electronic system; the staffing information system; and the inventory information system. One-stop e-office aims to simplify the office administration to support the implementation of the tasks institution. The programs have developed and maintained to ensure innovation sustainability. One-stop e-office innovation aims to facilitate the implementation of office administration to support the implementation of the tasks and functions of the institution. Therefore, this study aims to analyze how the implementation process of innovation. This study described the implementation model of one-stop e-office innovation in Puslatbang PKASN LAN. The research used a qualitative approach and descriptive method. Data collection techniques used were literature study, in-depth interviews, and observation. The data analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative technique. The innovation is implemented through three stages, namely the generation, acceptance and implementation of ideas. The Factors that drive the innovation implementation are the support from the stakeholders; the availability of competent personnel; the innovation competition climate in LAN; and the technology availability. While the factors that inhibit the innovation are the interest differences between work units; and limited resources for the innovation implementation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 999-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goo Hyeok Chung ◽  
Jin Nam Choi

Innovation literature typically postulates a linear and institution-driven implementation process that leads to bifurcated outcomes (i.e., acceptance or rejection) of innovation. Adopting a grounded theory approach and a social constructionist perspective, we explore dynamic, interactive implementation processes unfolding over time; these processes generate divergent and often unexpected outcomes. The present qualitative analysis of 40 cases of innovation reveals that two competing forces shape the implementation process. As initiators of innovation implementation, top managers form a driving force and introduce various tactics to facilitate implementation. Resistors or individuals against innovation form a resisting force and organize various schemes to inhibit implementation. The relative strengths of driving and resisting forces lead to four different patterns of implementation, namely, implementation without change, modified implementation, minimal implementation, and implementation failure. Dynamic interactions between initiators and resistors shift implementation outcomes by changing the perceptions of followers with regard to innovation characteristics. The resulting theoretical framework highlights the political nature of innovation implementation and indicates the need to consider socioeconomic and sociopolitical dynamics involving multiple organizational actors.


Author(s):  
Eduardo Terán-Yépez ◽  
Gema M. Marín-Carrillo ◽  
M. Pilar Casado-Belmonte ◽  
María de las Mercedes Capobianco-Uriarte

Literature argues that innovation has an inherent and critical relevance in sustainable entrepreneurship (SE). However, due to the variety of innovation types and the broad spectrum covered by this concept, there is not a clear understanding of which roles innovation plays in SE. To address the limitations of current literature, the main objective of this chapter is to conduct a literature review on underlying the roles of innovation in SE. The literature analysis reveals seven different roles that innovation adopts in SE and that those have seldom been related to each other. This chapter closes this gap by discussing and suggesting an integrative and dynamic framework of how these roles possess parallel ways, superpose, and influence one another, suggesting that SE actually is about a multi-innovation implementation process.


Author(s):  
Oyewusi Lawunmi Molara ◽  
Egbedokun Adeola Oyebisi ◽  
Oyeniran Folasade Mardiyya

This chapter focuses on the concept of change as it relates to educational innovation in Nigeria. It describes change as a transition from one state to another. It highlights some of the descriptions of change, its characteristics, and process. It further discusses innovation as a product of change and that both are intertwined. The chapter also raises some of the reasons why innovation ideas (such as 6-3-3-4, 5-6-2-3 systems of education, UPE, UBE, Mother tongue, Nomadic education, amongst others) have failed in Nigeria. These reasons include lack of preparation, lack of effective implementation, lack of funds, etc. It concludes by pointing readers to issues that could be considered salient for innovation prospects such as policy issues on the part of the government, educational technology as a pivot for innovation implementation, training of teachers and other personnels that would be involved in the implementation process, caring for the new generation of learners, and the process of innovation adoption.


2019 ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
A. I. Potapova

The article analyzes the level of perception of IT innovations and its impact on the state of innovative receptivity of staff in an organization. In this regard, Adapting the staff to changes and managing the innovation implementation process become acute issues for the firm.


2020 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 10046
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Trebukhin ◽  
Ella Okolelova ◽  
Marina Shibaeva

The paper presents the results of research in the field of life cycle management of innovative projects through the use of portfolio approach techniques. A methodology for assessing risks and forecasting expected economic results in the analysis of life cycle stages is proposed. Existing approaches to determining the level of competitiveness of planned innovations in the portfolio are considered. A sequence of managing parameters of the project life cycle has been developed, which allows choosing the optimal set of risk management methods within the framework of an innovative project. Based on the identified factors that increase and reduce the impact of a particular risk on the innovation implementation process, methods are proposed for monitoring the competitiveness of projects, which allow assessing the most effective areas for their implementation.


Author(s):  
Neeta Baporikar

Due to rapid evolution of technology, innovations are vital to most organizations (Choi & Chan, 2009, p. 245). Nevertheless, the results of innovations are in many cases not satisfying. Several studies have shown that an organization's failure to benefit from an adopted innovation can often be attributed to a deficient implementation process rather than to the innovation itself. Thus, the implementation process is a critical interface between the decision to adopt and the routine usage of an innovation. Ways and methods to implement innovation effectively have been under scholarship for some time now. Despite the number of studies which identify multiple causes of unsuccessful implementation processes, literature is lacking regarding the strategic facets of innovation implementation. Building on the derived knowledge of the underlying dynamics of innovation processes, through grounded theory and in-depth literature review, the present study aims to contribute to existing implementation literature by examining the strategic facets of innovation implementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document