Chief complaints and diagnoses of displaced Israelis seeking medical treatment during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Lipsitz, PhD ◽  
Deena Zimmerman, MD, MPH ◽  
Nahum Kovalski, MD ◽  
Raz Gross, MD, MPH ◽  
Rachel Hammel, MD

Objective: To examine patterns of visits by residents of northern Israel displaced during the Israel- Lebanon War of 2006 to an urgent care system in central Israel and to compare these patterns with those of local patients.Design: Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records.Setting: Urgent care clinic system in and around Jerusalem, Israel.Participants: Patients residing in northern Israel who presented from July 12 to August 21, 2006. Local patients who presented during the same time period were used for comparison.Interventions: None.Main outcome measures: Chief complaints, discharge diagnoses, demographics, and visit characteristics.Results: There were a total of 1,175 visits for 938 northern patients, reflecting 6.7 percent of total visits to this system. Overall age distribution of northerners was generally similar. As a proportion of visits, adult northerners were less likely to visit for chief complaints of injury or laceration and more likely to visit for complaint of back pain.They were more likely to have a discharge diagnosis of chest pain, anxiety, or hypertension. Northern children and adolescents were less likely to visit due to injury or fall or to have a discharge diagnosis of fracture.They were more likely to have a discharge diagnosis of gastroenteritis or tonsillitis.Conclusions: Patterns of common discharge diagnoses were generally similar between northern and local residents, with the exception of fewer injury-related visits and more anxiety-related visits. Urgent care appears to have served an important function for displaced individuals during this war, mostly for routine medical needs.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6542-6542
Author(s):  
Jack S Bevins ◽  
Hannah Fullington ◽  
Thomas W. Froehlich ◽  
Stephanie Hobbs ◽  
Ethan Halm ◽  
...  

6542 Background: Several cancer centers describe cancer-patient dedicated urgent care clinic (UCC) that address commonly anticipated complaints of adults with cancer. UCC may be capable of preventing some ED visits, but little is known of the safety and outcomes for patients after a UCC visit. Methods: We identified UCC visits made by adults at our comprehensive cancer center between 2013-2016 and compared the cohort to patients who did not visit the UCC. We linked patients to tumor registry data and their electronic health record from the UCC visit, then tracked ED visits, inpatient and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions occurring within 24 hours of the UCC visit. Results: Between 2013-2016, 551 patients generated 772 UCC visits, compared to 17,496 who did not visit. UCC users had significantly (p<0.001) more advanced-stage cancer than non-UCC users (37.3% vs 18.9%), but there were no significant differences in mean age, race/ethnicity, or death within 180 days of diagnosis. The most common chief complaints accounted for nearly half of all UCC visits: (17.4%), URI symptoms/fever (12.6%), nausea/vomiting/diarrhea (7.8%), and fatigue/weakness (7.6%). After 10.0% of UCC visits, patients had an ED visit, while 12.3% were admitted to the hospital; only 5 UCC visits (0.7%) had an associated ICU stay. Most patients (75.7%) only had a single UCC visit, but patients who visited the UCC more often tended to have higher rates of ED visits and hospitalizations within 24 hours (Table). The mean time from UCC arrival to ED arrival was 3.0 hours, and 6.5 hours from UCC arrival to inpatient arrival. Conclusions: The majority of patients seen in UCC did not require ED or inpatient hospitalization. Patients with subsequent ED or inpatient visits had minimal delays in care. Findings suggest that triaging cancer patients for commonly anticipated complaints to a UCC does not result in high rates of mis-triaging or major delays in care. Patients with ED, Inpatient, or ICU visit after UCC, stratified by UCC visits per patient (2013-2016). [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S360-S360
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn Thomesen ◽  
Matthew Lipow ◽  
Tess S Munoz ◽  
Sara K Schultz

Abstract Background 30-day readmission rates are the parameter that hospitals and insurance companies use to measure clinical quality of care and set reimbursement levels for care (McCormack, et al., 2013). The 2019 readmission rate for United States hospitals was 14.9%; however, reported readmission rates vary in accuracy due to exclusion of at-risk populations or patients who seek care outside the hospital network (America’s Health Rankings, 2020; Gupta, et al., 2018). As coordinators of a student-run urgent care clinic operating within a Philadelphia syringe exchange and harm-reduction social services organization, we serve an at-risk patient population that includes a large portion of individuals who are transiently housed, people who engage in sex work, and people who use drugs (PWUD). We sought to determine our at-risk population’s impact on current readmission rates and the ability of hospitalization to meet their unique medical needs. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 607 electronic charts for patients who sought care at our student run clinic associated with a syringe exchange in Kensington, Philadelphia from January 2017 to January 2020, and identified patients who visited our clinic within 30 days of self-reported hospitalization. We identified time since hospitalization, purpose for hospitalization, and reason for clinic visit. Results Of 607 visits, 100 (16.5%) self-reported hospitalization within 30 days clinic presentation. Of these 100 clinic visits, 64% presented with the same chief complaint as their reason for hospitalization, and 21% presented with a complication related to their hospital visit. 33% of visits associated with previous hospitalization were from infections associated with IV drug use, including abscess, cellulitis, and osteomyelitis. On average, patients presented 7.5 days following hospital departure. Conclusion We identified a high incidence of clinic visits for medical needs associated with recent hospitalization, particularly injection-related infection, which suggests insufficient hospital care for this at-risk population. The number of readmissions for this population is underestimated due to their ability to seek medical care outside of the hospital network. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (50-51) ◽  
pp. 1383-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexia Harrist ◽  
Clayton Van Houten ◽  
Stanford T. Shulman ◽  
Chris Van Beneden ◽  
Tracy Murphy

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4179-4179
Author(s):  
Shivani Rao ◽  
Nicole K. Yun ◽  
James L. Coggan ◽  
Peter Wu ◽  
Teresa O'Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In sickle cell disease (SCD), the polymerization of deoxygenated HbS fundamentally alters the structure of the erythrocyte, producing the sickle cell that is characteristic of the disease. Clinical manifestations often perceived in patients suffering from SCD include vaso-occlusion, anemia, and hemolysis. Due to these sequelae, patients frequent the emergency room (ER), urgent care clinic, and hospital. Voxelotor, an oral medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for the treatment of SCD, directly targets the pathophysiology of SCD by inhibiting deoxygenated HbS polymerization. Results of the Phase III HOPE trial indicate that the drug can increase hemoglobin levels and reduce markers of hemolysis as well as the incidence of worsening anemia in patients with SCD (Vichinsky et al. N Engl J Med 2019). The COVID-19 pandemic has posed several challenges for patients with SCD in 2020. Amid the pandemic, patients continued to seek out acute medical care, including care in the ER, urgent care clinics, and hospital. The aim of this study was to determine whether utilization of acute medical care differed for patients who received voxelotor before and after therapy in 2020. We also evaluated the utilization of healthcare through telemedicine platforms to facilitate access to novel therapies such as voxelotor for patients with SCD. Methods 13 patients (≥18 years of age as of January 1, 2020) with SCD who had begun treatment with voxelotor between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were included in the initial analysis. Six patients were excluded from final analysis: three discontinued treatment due to side effects, one was noncompliant with treatment, and two were lost to follow-up. Acute care utilization, measured by the number of times each patient visited the ER, urgent care clinic, and hospital was compared for each patient in the period six months prior to their first dose of voxelotor and in the period six months after their last dose of the drug in 2020 using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests. Demographic information and the type of visit at which patients agreed to proceed with voxeletor was recorded for each patient. Simple linear regressions and multiple regressions controlled for covariates, defined as sex, BMI, age, type of insurance coverage, and duration of treatment. Results All seven (100%) patients discussed voxelotor treatment with their provider during a telehealth video visit. In the period before initiating treatment, patients frequented the ER an average of 2.71 (SD=6.75) times. In the six months after their last dose, patients visited the ER less than they had in the period prior to treatment, on average 0.57 (SD=0.79) times. This difference did not achieve statistical significance (p&gt;0.9999). The mean number of visits to the urgent care clinic in the six months before treatment was 2.71 (SD=6.75) compared to 2 (SD=4) in the period after patients' last dose in 2020. This finding was not statistically significant (p&gt;0.9999). Hospitalizations, on average, decreased significantly from 5.14 (SD=2.34) in the six months before starting treatment to 1.57 (SD=0.98) after ending therapy for 2020 (p=0.0015). Covariates did not have an effect on the differences in acute care utilization before treatment and after last treatment in 2020. Conclusions The findings of this study imply that treatment with voxelotor was associated with a decrease in the frequency of hospitalizations for the seven patients analyzed. This finding can potentially be attributed to the efficacy of voxelotor in improving anemia and reducing complications associated with SCD. While the difference between ER visits and urgent care visits before treatment and after the last dose in 2020 did not achieve statistical significance, likely due to small sample size, the data does suggest a reduction in both outcomes. In addition, the observation that all visits in which patient and provider discussed and initiated treatment were virtual support the use of telemedicine technology to improve access to multidisciplinary care and novel therapies for SCD patients. The impact of voxelotor treatment will continue to be assessed in SCD patients at our institution, and more data from clinical encounters will lead to a greater understanding of the efficacy of voxelotor. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jain: GBT: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Other: advisory board; Argenx: Other: advisory board; DOVA: Other: advisory board.


2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfreda E. Thurston ◽  
Leslie M. Tutty ◽  
Amanda E. Eisener ◽  
Lise Lalonde ◽  
Cathie Belenky ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1067-1069.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Misha Rosenbach ◽  
Sarah Kagan ◽  
Sari Leventhal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document