scholarly journals Effect of Patient-Centered Transitional Care Services on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure

JAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 321 (8) ◽  
pp. 753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriette G. C. Van Spall ◽  
Shun Fu Lee ◽  
Feng Xie ◽  
Urun Erbas Oz ◽  
Richard Perez ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 172 (4) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel R. Blum ◽  
Henning Øien ◽  
Harris L. Carmichael ◽  
Paul Heidenreich ◽  
Douglas K. Owens ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1427-1443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriette G.C. Van Spall ◽  
Tahseen Rahman ◽  
Oliver Mytton ◽  
Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige ◽  
Quazi Ibrahim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Dorsch ◽  
Karen B. Farris ◽  
Brigid E. Rowell ◽  
Scott L. Hummel ◽  
Todd M. Koelling

BACKGROUND Successful management of heart failure (HF) involves guideline based medical therapy as well as self-care behavior. As a result, the management of HF is moving toward a proactive real-time technological model of assisting patients with monitoring and self-management. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application intervention that enhances self-monitoring on health-related quality of life, self-management, and reduces HF readmissions. METHODS A single-center randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients greater than 45 years of age and admitted for acute decompensated HF or recently discharged in the past 4 weeks were included. The intervention group used a mobile application (App). The intervention prompted daily self-monitoring and promoted self-management. The control group (No App) received usual care. The primary outcome was the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) questionnaire and recurrent HF admissions. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were enrolled and completed all baseline assessments. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups with the exception of HF etiology. The App group had a reduced MLHFQ at 6 weeks (37.5 ± 3.5 vs. 48.2 ± 3.7, P=0.039) but not at 12 weeks (44.2 ± 4 vs. 45.9 ± 4, P=0.778) compared to No App. There was no effect of the App on the SCHFI at 6 or 12 weeks. The time to first HF admission was not statistically different between the App versus No App groups (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.39-2.02, P=0.781) over 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS The mobile application intervention improved MLHFQ at 6 weeks, but did not sustain its effects at 12 weeks. No effect was seen on HF self-care. Further research is needed to enhance engagement in the application for a longer period of time and to determine if the application can reduce HF admissions in a larger study. CLINICALTRIAL NCT03149510


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. S93
Author(s):  
J. McConnery ◽  
F. Foroutan ◽  
A. Alba ◽  
H. Ross ◽  
J. MacIver

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document