scholarly journals Case study of the integration of electronic patient‐reported outcomes as standard of care in a head and neck oncology practice: Obstacles and opportunities

Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Strachna ◽  
Marc A. Cohen ◽  
Monica M. Allison ◽  
David G. Pfister ◽  
Nancy Y. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Head And Neck Oncology ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oncology Practice

Validity of functional patient-reported outcomes in head and neck oncology: A systematic review

Oral Oncology ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 105701
Author(s):  
Adrian I. Mendez ◽  
Jacob G.J. Wihlidal ◽  
Dean T. Eurich ◽  
Anthony C. Nichols ◽  
S. Danielle MacNeil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Head And Neck Oncology ◽  
Patient Reported

Patient reported outcomes in pediatric oncology practice: Suggestions for future usage by parents and pediatric oncologists

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 1707-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Schepers ◽  
V.E. Engelen ◽  
L. Haverman ◽  
H.N. Caron ◽  
P.M. Hoogerbrugge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oncology Practice

Swallowing in the first year after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Clinician-and patient-reported outcomes

Head & Neck ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne M. Patterson ◽  
Elaine McColl ◽  
Paul N. Carding ◽  
Anthony J. Hildreth ◽  
Charles Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
First Year ◽  
Patient Reported

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: A New Standard of Care?

Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (Suppl. 6) ◽  
pp. 327-328
Author(s):  
Paul Martin Putora
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Effects on patient-reported outcomes of “Screening of Distress and Referral Need” implemented in Dutch oncology practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 3391-3398
Author(s):  
Floor M. van Nuenen ◽  
Stacey M. Donofrio ◽  
Marrit A. Tuinman ◽  
Harry B. M. van de Wiel ◽  
Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
Distress Level ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Specialized Care ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Screening For Distress ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Purpose This study investigated the effect of the “Screening for Distress and Referral Need” (SDRN) process (completing a screening instrument; patient-caregiver discussion about the patient’s responses, regardless of distress level, and possible referral to specialized care), implemented in Dutch oncology practice on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods A non-randomized time-sequential study was conducted to compare two cohorts. Cohort 1 respondents (C1) were recruited before and cohort 2 respondents (C2) after SDRN implementation in nine Dutch hospitals. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ-C30, HADS, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III, and the Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DT&PL). Descriptive analyses and univariate tests were conducted. Results C2 respondents (N = 422, response = 54%) had significantly lower mean scores on the practical (t = 2.3; p = 0.02), social (t = 2.3; p = 0.03), and emotional PL domains (t = 2.9; p = 0.004) compared with C1 (N = 518, response = 53%). No significant differences were found on quality of life, anxiety, depression, satisfaction with care, distress level, the spiritual and physical PL domains, or on referral wish. Conclusions After implementation of SDRN, patients report significantly fewer psychosocial (practical, social, and emotional) problems on the DT/PL but responses on the other patient-reported outcomes were comparable. These results add to the mixed evidence on the beneficial effect of distress screening. More and better focused research is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document