scholarly journals Governing long-term social-ecological change: what can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other?

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Foxon ◽  
Mark S. Reed ◽  
Lindsay C. Stringer
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram Büscher ◽  
Elna De Beer

Long-term planning for social-ecological change is a paradox in the current neoliberal era. This paradox is illustrated through combining critical research and practical experience in a transfrontier conservation and development intervention in Southern Africa.


Author(s):  
Junga Lee ◽  
Byoung-Suk Kweon ◽  
Christopher D. Ellis ◽  
Sang-Woo Lee

Ecosystem services depend on the interrelation between people and the environment, and people are increasingly recognizing the social value of ecosystem services. Based on humans needs related to the values of ecosystem services, riparian greenways, properly planned and managed for resiliency, could provide great opportunities for social ecological change and transformation toward sustainability. We focus on the ecosystem service values of such greenways based on resilience in urban communities. The purpose of this study is to assess the social value of ecosystem services for resilient riparian greenway planning and management based on a survey of residents living near the Yangjaecheon riparian greenway in Gwacheon, South Korea. First, cluster analysis was performed with data from 485 completed surveys to identify different groups of respondents. Importance-performance analysis (IPA) was then applied to develop planning and management guidance for the riparian greenway based on group characteristics. Two distinct groups were identified: the Strong Social Value of Ecosystem Services group and the Neutral Social Value of Ecosystem Services group. Different distributions were found between the two groups based on gender and residency period, and significant differences were also found for age and familiarity with the riparian greenway. The results show what each group perceived to be important and how well the riparian greenway met their expectations regarding ecosystem services. These results indicate the perceived value of ecosystem services on the basis of the group characteristics, helping establish the direction for resilient riparian greenway planning and management approaches.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Samantha Mc Culloch-Jones ◽  
Peter Novellie ◽  
Dirk J Roux ◽  
Bianca Currie

Summary Globally, there is a trend towards conserving biodiversity by promoting co-management with multiple stakeholders at landscape scales. Environmental policies emphasize stakeholder engagement in decision-making, yet landscape conservation is typically a bureaucratic–scientific endeavour. Building trusting relationships with stakeholders is key to negotiations that minimize trade-offs and maximize synergies. Incorporating shared stakeholder objectives improves co-management, as they act as incentives for participation and trust development. We explored the degree of alignment between the bottom-up stakeholder objectives and top-down management objectives of a landscape-scale conservation initiative on the West Coast of South Africa. We categorized stakeholders into six affiliations representing governmental, private and community organizations, and using a social-ecological inventory we identified ten shared objectives. Of these objectives, three were shared between all affiliations, namely biodiversity conservation, socioeconomic development and coordination of the landscape approach. The first two aligned with the top-down landscape management objectives and the latter did not. The importance of coordinating landscape approaches in multi-stakeholder landscape-scale initiatives is crucial to long-term success, and we recommend that it be formally included as a landscape management objective. Exploring the alignment between bottom-up and top-down objectives can highlight overlooked functions of co-management and can reduce the transaction costs of sustaining conservation efforts in the long term.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erle C. Ellis ◽  
Nicholas R. Magliocca ◽  
Chris J. Stevens ◽  
Dorian Q. Fuller

Author(s):  
Timothy Foxon ◽  
Lindsay Stringer ◽  
Mark Reed

For addressing and governing long-term socialecological change two different framworks are available: transition management and adaptive management. They emphasise the roles of social learning and stakeholder participation in different contexts.


Rangelands ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 106-116
Author(s):  
Caley K. Gasch ◽  
David Toledo ◽  
Katherine Kral-O'Brien ◽  
Carol Baldwin ◽  
Cayla Bendel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document