Cost-effectiveness of selective neck dissection versus modified radical neck dissection for treating metastases in patients with oral cavity cancer: A modelling study

Head & Neck ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1762-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim M. Govers ◽  
Sejal Patel ◽  
Robert P. Takes ◽  
Thijs Merkx ◽  
Maroeska Rovers ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18275-e18275
Author(s):  
Joseph Roy Acevedo ◽  
Katherine Elaine Fero ◽  
Bayard R Wilson ◽  
Charles Coffey ◽  
James Don Murphy

Author(s):  
Adharsh Anand ◽  
Sivakumar Vidhyadharan ◽  
Narayana Subramaniam ◽  
Deepak Balsubramanian ◽  
Azhar Jan Battoo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (S1) ◽  
pp. S2-S7 ◽  
Author(s):  
J T Wang ◽  
C E Palme ◽  
A Y Wang ◽  
G J Morgan ◽  
V Gebski ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:This study aimed to compare recurrence and survival in patients undergoing either selective neck dissection or modified radical neck dissection to treat metastatic cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to the cervical lymph nodes (levels I–V) only.Methods:Twenty-eight year, retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database from a tertiary referral hospital, with a minimum follow up of two years.Results:There were 122 eligible patients: 96 males (79 per cent) and 26 (21 per cent) females (median age, 66 years). Sixty-six patients (54 per cent) underwent selective neck dissection and 56 (46 per cent) modified radical neck dissection. The former patients had a lower rate of regional recurrence compared with the latter (17 vs 23 per cent, respectively). There was no significant difference in five-year overall survival (61 vs 57 per cent, respectively) or five-year disease-free survival (74 vs 60 per cent, respectively), comparing the two groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival were significantly improved by the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy.Conclusion:We found no difference in outcome in patients undergoing selective versus modified radical neck dissection. Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved outcome.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3886-3891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Acevedo ◽  
Katherine E. Fero ◽  
Bayard Wilson ◽  
Assuntina G. Sacco ◽  
Loren K. Mell ◽  
...  

Purpose Recently, a large randomized trial found a survival advantage among patients who received elective neck dissection in conjunction with primary surgery for clinically node-negative oral cavity cancer compared with those receiving primary surgery alone. However, elective neck dissection comes with greater upfront cost and patient morbidity. We present a cost-effectiveness analysis of elective neck dissection for the initial surgical management of early-stage oral cavity cancer. Methods We constructed a Markov model to simulate primary, adjuvant, and salvage therapy; disease recurrence; and survival in patients with T1/T2 clinically node-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Transition probabilities were derived from clinical trial data; costs (in 2015 US dollars) and health utilities were estimated from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, expressed as dollar per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), were calculated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios less than $100,000/QALY considered cost effective. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to examine model uncertainty. Results Our base-case model found that over a lifetime the addition of elective neck dissection to primary surgery reduced overall costs by $6,000 and improved effectiveness by 0.42 QALYs compared with primary surgery alone. The decrease in overall cost despite the added neck dissection was a result of less use of salvage therapy. On one-way sensitivity analysis, the model was most sensitive to assumptions about disease recurrence, survival, and the health utility reduction from a neck dissection. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that treatment with elective neck dissection was cost effective 76% of the time at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Conclusion Our study found that the addition of elective neck dissection reduces costs and improves health outcomes, making this a cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer.


Oral Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S36-S37
Author(s):  
Y.-S. Shin ◽  
W.-S. Kim ◽  
S.-H. Kim ◽  
Y.-W. Koh ◽  
H.-S. Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shilpa R. ◽  
Azeem Moyihuddin

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> In India oral cancer is the commonest malignant neoplasm, accounting for 20-30% of all cancers. Southern India presents the highest oral cancer incidence rates among women worldwide.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was conducted in R. L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre and SDU Medical College Kolar, Karnataka. Thirty patients having oral squamous cell carcinoma with clinically N<sub>1 </sub>neck undergoing modified radical neck dissection between December 2010 and June 2012 were enrolled in the study. The objective of study was to determine whether dissection of posterior triangle and lower deep jugular lymph node is mandatory in therapeutic neck dissection as a part of treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity with clinically N<sub>1 </sub>neck.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Out of 24 patients, 16 patients underwent wide excision with hemimandibulectomy. In these 16 cases, 2 patients had reconstruction with double flap while rest 14 cases with island pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Out of remaining 8 patients, 2 patients underwent marginal mandibulectomy. In all these 8 patients, reconstruction was done using nasolabial flap in 1 patient, buccal pad of fat in 2 patients, masseter flap in 1 patient and forehead flap in 4 patients. In carcinoma anterior 2/3<sup>rd</sup> tongue, all 6 patients underwent hemiglossectomy with simultaneous modified radical neck dissection.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> It was concluded that during neck dissection, it may be oncologically safe to avoid level IV and level V clearance in buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma with N<sub>1</sub> neck.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document