scholarly journals snRNP Sm proteins share two evolutionarily conserved sequence motifs which are involved in Sm protein-protein interactions.

1995 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2076-2088 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hermann ◽  
P. Fabrizio ◽  
V.A. Raker ◽  
K. Foulaki ◽  
H. Hornig ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y. Galperin ◽  
Shan-Ho Chou

The HD-GYP domain, named after two of its conserved sequence motifs, was first described in 1999 as a specialized version of the widespread HD phosphohydrolase domain that had additional highly conserved amino acid residues. Domain associations of HD-GYP indicated its involvement in bacterial signal transduction and distribution patterns of this domain suggested that it could serve as a hydrolase of the bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP, in addition to or instead of the EAL domain. Subsequent studies confirmed the ability of various HD-GYP domains to hydrolyze c-di-GMP to linear pGpG and/or GMP. Certain HD-GYP-containing proteins hydrolyze another second messenger, cGAMP, and some HD-GYP domains participate in regulatory protein-protein interactions. The recently solved structures of HD-GYP domains from four distinct organisms clarified the mechanisms of c-di-GMP binding and metal-assisted hydrolysis. However, the HD-GYP domain is poorly represented in public domain databases, which causes certain confusion about its phylogenic distribution, functions, and domain architectures. Here, we present a refined sequence model for the HD-GYP domain and describe the roles of its most conserved residues in metal and/or substrate binding. We also calculate the numbers of HD-GYPs encoded in various genomes and list the most common domain combinations involving HD-GYP, such as the RpfG (REC-HD-GYP), Bd1817 (DUF3391-HD-GYP), and PmGH (GAF-HD-GYP) protein families. We also provide the descriptions of six HD-GYP-associated domains, including four novel integral membrane sensor domains. This work is expected to stimulate studies of diverse HD-GYP-containing proteins, their N-terminal sensor domains, and the signals to which they respond.


2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1769-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Atzorn ◽  
Paola Fragapane ◽  
Tamás Kiss

ABSTRACT Saccharomyces cerevisiae snR30 is an essential box H/ACA small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) required for the processing of 18S rRNA. Here, we show that the previously characterized human, reptilian, amphibian, and fish U17 snoRNAs represent the vertebrate homologues of yeast snR30. We also demonstrate that U17/snR30 is present in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the unicellular ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. Evolutionary comparison revealed that the 3′-terminal hairpins of U17/snR30 snoRNAs contain two highly conserved sequence motifs, the m1 (AUAUUCCUA) and m2 (AAACCAU) elements. Mutation analysis of yeast snR30 demonstrated that the m1 and m2 elements are essential for early cleavages of the 35S pre-rRNA and, consequently, for the production of mature 18S rRNA. The m1 and m2 motifs occupy the opposite strands of an internal loop structure, and they are located invariantly 7 nucleotides upstream from the ACA box of U17/snR30 snoRNAs. U17/snR30 is the first identified box H/ACA snoRNA that possesses an evolutionarily conserved role in the nucleolytic processing of eukaryotic pre-rRNA.


1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1647-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Thaller ◽  
Serena Schippa ◽  
Gian Maria Rossolini

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (11) ◽  
pp. 3965-3976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine A. White ◽  
Bree K. Grillo-Hill ◽  
Mario Esquivel ◽  
Jobelle Peralta ◽  
Vivian N. Bui ◽  
...  

β-Catenin functions as an adherens junction protein for cell–cell adhesion and as a signaling protein. β-catenin function is dependent on its stability, which is regulated by protein–protein interactions that stabilize β-catenin or target it for proteasome-mediated degradation. In this study, we show that β-catenin stability is regulated by intracellular pH (pHi) dynamics, with decreased stability at higher pHi in both mammalian cells and Drosophila melanogaster. β-Catenin degradation requires phosphorylation of N-terminal residues for recognition by the E3 ligase β-TrCP. While β-catenin phosphorylation was pH independent, higher pHi induced increased β-TrCP binding and decreased β-catenin stability. An evolutionarily conserved histidine in β-catenin (found in the β-TrCP DSGIHS destruction motif) is required for pH-dependent binding to β-TrCP. Expressing a cancer-associated H36R–β-catenin mutant in the Drosophila eye was sufficient to induce Wnt signaling and produced pronounced tumors not seen with other oncogenic β-catenin alleles. We identify pHi dynamics as a previously unrecognized regulator of β-catenin stability, functioning in coincidence with phosphorylation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Hemalatha ◽  
D. Satyanarayana Rao ◽  
L. Guruprasad

We have identified four repeats and ten domains that are novel in proteins encoded by theBacillus anthracisstr.Amesproteome using automated in silico methods. A “repeat” corresponds to a region comprising less than 55-amino-acid residues that occur more than once in the protein sequence and sometimes present in tandem. A “domain” corresponds to a conserved region with greater than 55-amino-acid residues and may be present as single or multiple copies in the protein sequence. These correspond to (1) 57-amino-acid-residue PxV domain, (2) 122-amino-acid-residue FxF domain, (3) 111-amino-acid-residue YEFF domain, (4) 109-amino-acid-residue IMxxH domain, (5) 103-amino-acid-residue VxxT domain, (6) 84-amino-acid-residue ExW domain, (7) 104-amino-acid-residue NTGFIG domain, (8) 36-amino-acid-residue NxGK repeat, (9) 95-amino-acid-residue VYV domain, (10) 75-amino-acid-residue KEWE domain, (11) 59-amino-acid-residue AFL domain, (12) 53-amino-acid-residue RIDVK repeat, (13) (a) 41-amino-acid-residue AGQF repeat and (b) 42-amino-acid-residue GSAL repeat. A repeat or domain type is characterized by specific conserved sequence motifs. We discuss the presence of these repeats and domains in proteins from other genomes and their probable secondary structure.


1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Hickson ◽  
C. Simon ◽  
A. Cooper ◽  
G. S. Spicer ◽  
J. Sullivan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1593-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenkang Zheng ◽  
Patricia C. Dos Santos

Iron–sulfur (Fe–S) clusters are ubiquitous cofactors present in all domains of life. The chemistries catalyzed by these inorganic cofactors are diverse and their associated enzymes are involved in many cellular processes. Despite the wide range of structures reported for Fe–S clusters inserted into proteins, the biological synthesis of all Fe–S clusters starts with the assembly of simple units of 2Fe–2S and 4Fe–4S clusters. Several systems have been associated with the formation of Fe–S clusters in bacteria with varying phylogenetic origins and number of biosynthetic and regulatory components. All systems, however, construct Fe–S clusters through a similar biosynthetic scheme involving three main steps: (1) sulfur activation by a cysteine desulfurase, (2) cluster assembly by a scaffold protein, and (3) guided delivery of Fe–S units to either final acceptors or biosynthetic enzymes involved in the formation of complex metalloclusters. Another unifying feature on the biological formation of Fe–S clusters in bacteria is that these systems are tightly regulated by a network of protein interactions. Thus, the formation of transient protein complexes among biosynthetic components allows for the direct transfer of reactive sulfur and Fe–S intermediates preventing oxygen damage and reactions with non-physiological targets. Recent studies revealed the importance of reciprocal signature sequence motifs that enable specific protein–protein interactions and consequently guide the transactions between physiological donors and acceptors. Such findings provide insights into strategies used by bacteria to regulate the flow of reactive intermediates and provide protein barcodes to uncover yet-unidentified cellular components involved in Fe–S metabolism.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan R Deans ◽  
Poonamjot Deol ◽  
Nina Titova ◽  
Sarah H Radi ◽  
Linh M Vuong ◽  
...  

Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4α (HNF4α), a master regulator of hepatocyte differentiation, is regulated by two promoters (P1 and P2). P1-HNF4α is the major isoform in the adult liver while P2-HNF4α is thought to be expressed only in fetal liver and liver cancer. Here, we show that P2-HNF4α is expressed at ZT9 and ZT21 in the normal adult liver and orchestrates a distinct transcriptome and metabolome via unique chromatin and protein-protein interactions. We demonstrate that while P1-HNF4α drives gluconeogenesis, P2-HNF4α drives ketogenesis and is required for elevated levels of ketone bodies in females. Exon swap mice expressing only P2- HNF4α exhibit subtle differences in circadian gene regulation and disruption of the clock increases expression of P2-HNF4α. Taken together, we propose that the highly conserved two-promoter structure of the Hnfa gene is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism to maintain the balance between gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis in the liver in a circadian fashion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document