scholarly journals Expanded criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A report from the International Registry of Hepatic Tumors in Liver Transplantation

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Onaca ◽  
Gary L. Davis ◽  
Robert M. Goldstein ◽  
Linda W. Jennings ◽  
Göran B. Klintmalm
2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 574-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Onaca ◽  
Gary L. Davis ◽  
Linda W. Jennings ◽  
Robert M. Goldstein ◽  
Goran B. Klintmalm

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 575-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Karakayali ◽  
G. Moray ◽  
H. Sozen ◽  
A. Dalgic ◽  
R. Emiroglu ◽  
...  

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Rou Liang ◽  
Chia-En Hsieh ◽  
Kuo-Hua Lin ◽  
Chih-Jan Ko ◽  
Yu-Ju Hung ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Milan criteria are the universal standard of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Numerous expanded criteria have shown outcomes as good as the Milan criteria. In Taiwan, living donor liver transplant (LDLT) accounts for the majority of transplantations due to organ shortages. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 155 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC from July 2005 to June 2017 and were followed up for at least 2 years. Patients beyond the Milan criteria (n = 78) were grouped as recurrent or nonrecurrent, and we established new expanded criteria based on these data. Results Patients beyond the Milan criteria with recurrence (n = 31) had a significantly larger maximal tumor diameter (4.13 ± 1.96 cm versus 6.10 ± 3.41 cm, p = 0.006) and total tumor diameter (7.19 ± 4.13 cm versus 10.21 ± 5.01 cm, p = 0.005). Therefore, we established expanded criteria involving maximal tumor diameter ≤ 6 cm and total tumor diameter < 10 cm. The 5-year survival rate of patients who met these criteria (n = 134) was 77.3%, and the 5-year recurrence rate was 20.5%; both showed no significant differences from those of the Milan criteria. Under the expanded criteria, the pool of eligible recipients was 35% larger than that of the Milan criteria. Conclusion Currently, patients with HCC who undergo LDLT can achieve good outcomes even when they are beyond the Milan criteria. Under the new expanded criteria, patients can achieve outcomes as good as those with the Milan criteria and more patients can benefit.


2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 3154-3156 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dalgic ◽  
H. Karakayali ◽  
G. Moray ◽  
R. Emiroglu ◽  
H. Sozen ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Llovet ◽  
Myron Schwartz ◽  
Josep Fuster ◽  
Jordi Bruix

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3932
Author(s):  
Pierluigi Toniutto ◽  
Elisa Fumolo ◽  
Ezio Fornasiere ◽  
Davide Bitetto

The Milan criteria (MC) were developed more than 20 years ago and are still considered the benchmark for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the strict application of MC might exclude some patients who may receive a clinical benefit of LT. Several expanded criteria have been proposed. Some of these consider pretransplant morphological and biological variables of the tumor, others consider post-LT variables such as the histology of the tumor, and others combine pre- and post-LT variables. More recently, the HCC response to locoregional treatments before transplantation emerged as a surrogate marker of the biological aggressiveness of the tumor to be used as a better selection criterion for LT in patients beyond the MC at presentation. This essential review aims to present the current data on the pretransplant selection criteria for LT in patients with HCC exceeding the MC at presentation based on morphological and histological characteristics of the tumor and to critically discuss those that have been validated in clinical practice. Moreover, the role of HCC biological markers and the tumor response to downstaging procedures as new tools for selecting patients with a tumor burden outside of the MC for LT is evaluated.


2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-825
Author(s):  
Maurício Silva ◽  
Angel Moya ◽  
Marina Berenguer ◽  
Martin Prieto ◽  
Fernando Sanjuan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 100294
Author(s):  
Aline L. Chagas ◽  
Angelo A. Mattos ◽  
Márcio A. Diniz ◽  
Guilherme E.G. Felga ◽  
Ilka F.S.F. Boin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 1006-1006
Author(s):  
Volkan Ince ◽  
Sami Akbulut ◽  
Emrah Otan ◽  
Veysel Ersan ◽  
Serdar Karakas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document