Evaluation of the substrate envelope hypothesis for inhibitors of HIV-1 protease

2007 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sripriya Chellappan ◽  
Visvaldas Kairys ◽  
Miguel X. Fernandes ◽  
Celia Schiffer ◽  
Michael K. Gilson
Keyword(s):  
Hiv 1 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1116-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhavi N.L. Nalam ◽  
Akbar Ali ◽  
G.S. Kiran Kumar Reddy ◽  
Hong Cao ◽  
Saima G. Anjum ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Liu ◽  
Ravikiran Yedidi ◽  
Joseph Brunzelle ◽  
Iulia Kovari ◽  
Ladislau Kovari

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (17) ◽  
pp. 8062-8079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linah N. Rusere ◽  
Gordon J. Lockbaum ◽  
Sook-Kyung Lee ◽  
Mina Henes ◽  
Klajdi Kosovrasti ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (19) ◽  
pp. 6099-6113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Altman ◽  
Akbar Ali ◽  
G. S. Kiran Kumar Reddy ◽  
Madhavi N. L. Nalam ◽  
Saima Ghafoor Anjum ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C116-C116
Author(s):  
Celia Schiffer

Drug resistance negatively impacts the lives of millions of patients and costs our society billions of dollars by limiting the longevity of many of our most potent drugs. Drug resistance can be caused by a change in the balance of molecular recognition events that selectively weakens inhibitor binding but maintains the biological function of the target. To reduce the likelihood of drug resistance, a detailed understanding of the target's function is necessary. Both structure at atomic resolution and evolutionarily constraints on its variation is required. "Resilient" targets are less susceptible to drug resistance due to their key location in a particular pathway. This rationale was derived through crystallographic studies elucidating substrate recognition and drug resistance in HIV-1 protease and Hepatitis C (HCV) NS3/4A protease. Both are key therapeutic targets and are potentially "resilient" targets where resistant mutations occur outside of the substrate binding site. To reduce the probability of drug resistance inhibitors should be designed to fit within what we define as the "substrate envelope". These principals are likely more generally applicable to other quickly evolving diseases where drug resistance is quickly evolving. http://www.umassmed.edu/schifferlab/index.aspx


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Abigail E. Wilcox ◽  
Ahnika Cota ◽  
S. Alice Woodson ◽  
Audrey C. Shor
Keyword(s):  
Rnase H ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Evelyn Kerr ◽  
Meera Bhakta ◽  
Jesi Hunter ◽  
John Hernandez ◽  
Carolyn Stelluti

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 5368-5378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhavi N. L. Nalam ◽  
Akbar Ali ◽  
Michael D. Altman ◽  
G. S. Kiran Kumar Reddy ◽  
Sripriya Chellappan ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 protease selectively alter inhibitor binding without significantly affecting substrate recognition and cleavage. This alteration in molecular recognition led us to develop the substrate-envelope hypothesis which predicts that HIV-1 protease inhibitors that fit within the overlapping consensus volume of the substrates are less likely to be susceptible to drug-resistant mutations, as a mutation impacting such inhibitors would simultaneously impact the processing of substrates. To evaluate this hypothesis, over 130 HIV-1 protease inhibitors were designed and synthesized using three different approaches with and without substrate-envelope constraints. A subset of 16 representative inhibitors with binding affinities to wild-type protease ranging from 58 nM to 0.8 pM was chosen for crystallographic analysis. The inhibitor-protease complexes revealed that tightly binding inhibitors (at the picomolar level of affinity) appear to “lock” into the protease active site by forming hydrogen bonds to particular active-site residues. Both this hydrogen bonding pattern and subtle variations in protein-ligand van der Waals interactions distinguish nanomolar from picomolar inhibitors. In general, inhibitors that fit within the substrate envelope, regardless of whether they are picomolar or nanomolar, have flatter profiles with respect to drug-resistant protease variants than inhibitors that protrude beyond the substrate envelope; this provides a strong rationale for incorporating substrate-envelope constraints into structure-based design strategies to develop new HIV-1 protease inhibitors.


2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (21) ◽  
pp. 12012-12021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M. King ◽  
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan ◽  
Ellen A. Nalivaika ◽  
Piet Wigerinck ◽  
Marie-Pierre de Béthune ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT TMC114, a newly designed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor, is extremely potent against both wild-type (wt) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) viruses in vitro as well as in vivo. Although chemically similar to amprenavir (APV), the potency of TMC114 is substantially greater. To examine the basis for this potency, we solved crystal structures of TMC114 complexed with wt HIV-1 protease and TMC114 and APV complexed with an MDR (L63P, V82T, and I84V) protease variant. In addition, we determined the corresponding binding thermodynamics by isothermal titration calorimetry. TMC114 binds approximately 2 orders of magnitude more tightly to the wt enzyme (Kd = 4.5 × 10−12 M) than APV (Kd = 3.9 × 10−10 M). Our X-ray data (resolution ranging from 2.2 to 1.2 Å) reveal strong interactions between the bis-tetrahydrofuranyl urethane moiety of TMC114 and main-chain atoms of D29 and D30. These interactions appear largely responsible for TMC114's very favorable binding enthalpy to the wt protease (−12.1 kcal/mol). However, TMC114 binding to the MDR HIV-1 protease is reduced by a factor of 13.3, whereas the APV binding constant is reduced only by a factor of 5.1. However, even with the reduction in binding affinity to the MDR HIV protease, TMC114 still binds with an affinity that is more than 1.5 orders of magnitude tighter than the first-generation inhibitors. Both APV and TMC114 fit predominantly within the substrate envelope, a property that may be associated with decreased susceptibility to drug-resistant mutations relative to that of first-generation inhibitors. Overall, TMC114's potency against MDR viruses is likely a combination of its extremely high affinity and close fit within the substrate envelope.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document