Evaluation of sustainable supply chain management performance: Indicators

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Narimissa ◽  
Ali Kangarani‐Farahani ◽  
Saber Molla‐Alizadeh‐Zavardehi
2018 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 02068
Author(s):  
Elisa Kusrini ◽  
Rangga Primadasa

This paper aims to design key performance indicators (KPIs) for evaluating sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) for palm oil processing industry in Indonesia. Supply chain sustainability is the management of environmental, social and economic impacts, and the encouragement of good governance practices, throughout the lifecycle of goods and services. The method in designing KPIs using a triangulation method, ie combining of theory (literature study) with field surveys and validate with the opinion of the expert (expert judgment) as well as compatibility with existing regulations (Indonesian sustainable palm oil / roundtable on sustainable palm oil). There are 29 proposed KPIs for measuring SCM’s sustainable palm oil in Indonesia based on literature and expert judgment. In order to obtain a more precise performance, then the importance level of KPI will be measured using Analytic Hierarchy Analysis (AHP) method. According to the preferences of some managers of palm oil using AHP method showed that the economic factor is the most dominant indicator (62,92%), followed by environmental (18,93%) and social factors (18,15%). In subsequent studies, the results of the KPIs will be used to measure the index of sustainability in the palm oil’s supply chain industry in Indonesia.


Author(s):  
Craig R. Carter ◽  
Marc R. Hatton ◽  
Chao Wu ◽  
Xiangjing Chen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to update the work of Carter and Easton (2011), by conducting a systematic review of the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) literature in the primary logistics and supply chain management journals, during the 2010–2018 timeframe. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology which follows the methodology employed by Carter and Easton (2011). An evaluation of this methodology, using the Modified AMSTAR criteria, demonstrates a high level of empirical validity. Findings The field of SSCM continues to evolve with changes in substantive focus, theoretical lenses, unit of analysis, methodology and type of analysis. However, there are still abundant future research opportunities, including investigating under-researched topics such as diversity and human rights/working conditions, employing the group as the unit of analysis and better addressing empirical validity and social desirability bias. Research limitations/implications The findings result in prescriptions and a broad agenda to guide future research in the SSCM arena. The final section of the paper provides additional avenues for future research surrounding theory development and decision making. Originality/value This SLR provides a rigorous, methodologically valid review of the continuing evolution of empirical SSCM research over a 28-year time period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document