The Selection of the Domain of Attraction of an Extreme Value Distribution from a Set of Data

Author(s):  
E. Castillo ◽  
J. Galambos ◽  
J. M. Sarabia
1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 833-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Cohen

Let F be a distribution in the domain of attraction of the type I extreme-value distribution Λ(x). In this paper we derive uniform rates of convergence of Fn to Λfor a large class of distributions F. We also generalise the penultimate approximation of Fisher and Tippett (1928) and show that for many F a type II or type III extreme-value distribution gives a better approximation than the limiting type I distribution.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney I. Resnick ◽  
Marcel F. Neuts

Consider the bivariate sequence of r.v.'s {(Jn, Xn), n ≧ 0} with X0 = - ∞ a.s. The marginal sequence {Jn} is an irreducible, aperiodic, m-state M.C., m < ∞, and the r.v.'s Xn are conditionally independent given {Jn}. Furthermore P{Jn = j, Xn ≦ x | Jn − 1 = i} = pijHi(x) = Qij(x), where H1(·), · · ·, Hm(·) are c.d.f.'s. Setting Mn = max {X1, · · ·, Xn}, we obtain P{Jn = j, Mn ≦ x | J0 = i} = [Qn(x)]i, j, where Q(x) = {Qij(x)}. The limiting behavior of this probability and the possible limit laws for Mn are characterized.Theorem. Let ρ(x) be the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue of Q(x) for real x; then:(a)ρ(x) is a c.d.f.;(b) if for a suitable normalization {Qijn(aijnx + bijn)} converges completely to a matrix {Uij(x)} whose entries are non-degenerate distributions then Uij(x) = πjρU(x), where πj = limn → ∞pijn and ρU(x) is an extreme value distribution;(c) the normalizing constants need not depend on i, j;(d) ρn(anx + bn) converges completely to ρU(x);(e) the maximum Mn has a non-trivial limit law ρU(x) iff Qn(x) has a non-trivial limit matrix U(x) = {Uij(x)} = {πjρU(x)} or equivalently iff ρ(x) or the c.d.f. πi = 1mHiπi(x) is in the domain of attraction of one of the extreme value distributions. Hence the only possible limit laws for {Mn} are the extreme value distributions which generalize the results of Gnedenko for the i.i.d. case.


2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 1007-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-P. Raoult ◽  
R. Worms

Let F be a distribution function in the domain of attraction of an extreme-value distribution H γ. If F u is the distribution function of the excesses over u and G γ the distribution function of the generalized Pareto distribution, then it is well known that F u (x) converges to G γ(x/σ(u)) as u tends to the end point of F, where σ is an appropriate normalizing function. We study the rate of (uniform) convergence to 0 of F̅ u (x)-G̅γ((x+u-α(u))/σ(u)), where α and σ are two appropriate normalizing functions.


1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 833-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Cohen

Let F be a distribution in the domain of attraction of the type I extreme-value distribution Λ(x). In this paper we derive uniform rates of convergence of Fn to Λfor a large class of distributions F. We also generalise the penultimate approximation of Fisher and Tippett (1928) and show that for many F a type II or type III extreme-value distribution gives a better approximation than the limiting type I distribution.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 136-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney I. Resnick

If for two c.d.f.'s F(·) and G(·), 1 – F(x)/1 – G(x) → A, 0 &lt;A &lt;∞ , as x → ∞, then for normalizing constants an &gt; 0, bn, n &gt; 1, Fn (anx + bn ) → φ(x), φ(x) non-degenerate, iff Gn (anx + bn )→ φ A−1(x). Conversely, if Fn (anx+bn )→ φ(x), Gn (anx + bn ) → φ'(x), φ(x) and φ'(x) non-degenerate, then there exist constants C &gt;0 and D such that φ'(x) =φ(Cx + D) and limx→∞ 1 — F(x)/1 — G(x) exists and is expressed in terms of C and D, depending on which type of extreme value distribution φ(x) is. These results are used to study domain of attraction questions for products of distribution functions and to reduce the limit law problem for maxima of a sequence of random variables defined on a Markov chain (M.C.) to the independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) case.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 323-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney I. Resnick ◽  
Marcel F. Neuts

Consider the bivariate sequence of r.v.'s {(J n , X n ), n ≧ 0} with X 0 = - ∞ a.s. The marginal sequence {J n } is an irreducible, aperiodic, m-state M.C., m &lt; ∞, and the r.v.'s X n are conditionally independent given {J n }. Furthermore P{J n = j, X n ≦ x | J n − 1 = i} = p ij H i (x) = Q ij (x), where H 1(·), · · ·, H m (·) are c.d.f.'s. Setting M n = max {X 1, · · ·, X n }, we obtain P{J n = j, M n ≦ x | J 0 = i} = [Q n (x)] i, j , where Q(x) = {Q ij (x)}. The limiting behavior of this probability and the possible limit laws for M n are characterized. Theorem. Let ρ(x) be the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue of Q(x) for real x; then: (a)ρ(x) is a c.d.f.; (b) if for a suitable normalization {Q ij n (a ijn x + b ijn )} converges completely to a matrix {U ij (x)} whose entries are non-degenerate distributions then U ij (x) = π j ρ U (x), where π j = lim n → ∞ p ij n and ρ U (x) is an extreme value distribution; (c) the normalizing constants need not depend on i, j; (d) ρ n (a n x + b n ) converges completely to ρ U (x); (e) the maximum M n has a non-trivial limit law ρ U (x) iff Q n (x) has a non-trivial limit matrix U(x) = {U ij (x)} = {π j ρ U (x)} or equivalently iff ρ(x) or the c.d.f. π i = 1 m H i π i(x) is in the domain of attraction of one of the extreme value distributions. Hence the only possible limit laws for {M n } are the extreme value distributions which generalize the results of Gnedenko for the i.i.d. case.


1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 706-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles M. Goldie ◽  
Sidney Resnick

When does a distribution F have the property of both being in the domain of attraction of exp {–e–x} and having a second convolution-power tail equivalent to the first: Sufficient conditions and examples are given.


2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1007-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-P. Raoult ◽  
R. Worms

Let F be a distribution function in the domain of attraction of an extreme-value distribution Hγ. If Fu is the distribution function of the excesses over u and Gγ the distribution function of the generalized Pareto distribution, then it is well known that Fu(x) converges to Gγ(x/σ(u)) as u tends to the end point of F, where σ is an appropriate normalizing function. We study the rate of (uniform) convergence to 0 of F̅u(x)-G̅γ((x+u-α(u))/σ(u)), where α and σ are two appropriate normalizing functions.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney I. Resnick

If for two c.d.f.'s F(·) and G(·), 1 – F(x)/1 – G(x) → A, 0 <A <∞, as x → ∞, then for normalizing constants an > 0, bn, n > 1, Fn(anx + bn) → φ(x), φ(x) non-degenerate, iff Gn(anx + bn)→ φ A−1(x). Conversely, if Fn(anx+bn)→ φ(x), Gn(anx + bn) → φ'(x), φ(x) and φ'(x) non-degenerate, then there exist constants C >0 and D such that φ'(x) =φ(Cx + D) and limx→∞ 1 — F(x)/1 — G(x) exists and is expressed in terms of C and D, depending on which type of extreme value distribution φ(x) is. These results are used to study domain of attraction questions for products of distribution functions and to reduce the limit law problem for maxima of a sequence of random variables defined on a Markov chain (M.C.) to the independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document