Bounded Model Checking for Weighted Interpreted Systems and for Flat Weighted Epistemic Computation Tree Logic

2014 ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bożena Woźna-Szcześniak ◽  
Ireneusz Szcześniak ◽  
Agnieszka M. Zbrzezny ◽  
Andrzej Zbrzezny
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Bounded Model Checking ◽  
Computation Tree Logic ◽  
Computation Tree

Bounded Model Checking for Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1656-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong-Hua ZHOU ◽  
Zhi-Feng LIU ◽  
Chang-Da WANG
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Bounded Model Checking ◽  
Probabilistic Computation ◽  
Computation Tree Logic ◽  
Computation Tree

scholarly journals Comparing sat-based bounded model checking rtectl and ectl properties

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (20) ◽  
pp. 131-147
Author(s):  
Agnieszka M. Zbrzezny
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Model Checking ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Bounded Model Checking ◽  
Transition System ◽  
Running Time ◽  
Computation Tree Logic ◽  
Computation Tree

We compare two SAT-based bounded model checking algorithms for the properties expressed in the existential fragment of a soft real-time computation tree logic (RTECTL) and in the existential fragment of computation tree logic (ECTL). To this end, we use the generic pipeline paradigm (GPP) and the train controller system (TC), the classic concurrency problems, which we formalise by means of a finite transition system. We consider several properties of the problems that can be expressed in both RTECTL and ECTL, and we present the performance evaluation of the mentioned bounded model checking methods by means of the running time and the memory used.

scholarly journals Incremental Construction of Counterexamples in Model Checking Web Documents

10.29007/c8jt ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Weitl ◽  
Shin Nakajima
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Description Logic ◽  
Level Of Detail ◽  
Web Documents ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Computation Tree Logic ◽  
Computation Tree ◽  
Incremental Construction ◽  
Analysis Of Error

A new algorithm for incrementally generating counterexamples for the temporal description logic ALCCTL is presented. ALCCTL is a decidable combination of the description logic ALC and computation tree logic CTL that is expressive for content- and structure-related properties of web documents being verified by model checking. In the case of a specification violation, existing model checkers provide a single counterexample which may be large and complex. We extend existing algorithms for generating counterexamples in two ways. First, a coarse counterexample is generated initially that can be refined subsequently to the desired level of detail in an incremental manner. Second, the user can choose where and in which way a counterexample is refined. This enables the interactive step-by-step analysis of error scenarios according to the user's interest.We demonstrate in a case study on a web-based training document that the proposed approach reveals more errors and explains the cause of errors more precisely than the counterexamples of existing model checkers. In addition, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is sufficiently fast to enable smooth interaction even in the case of large documents.

Logical foundations of hierarchical model checking

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norihiro Kamide
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Hierarchical Model ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Hierarchical Systems ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Computation Tree Logic ◽  
Computation Tree ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop new simple logics and translations for hierarchical model checking. Hierarchical model checking is a model-checking paradigm that can appropriately verify systems with hierarchical information and structures. Design/methodology/approach In this study, logics and translations for hierarchical model checking are developed based on linear-time temporal logic (LTL), computation-tree logic (CTL) and full computation-tree logic (CTL*). A sequential linear-time temporal logic (sLTL), a sequential computation-tree logic (sCTL), and a sequential full computation-tree logic (sCTL*), which can suitably represent hierarchical information and structures, are developed by extending LTL, CTL and CTL*, respectively. Translations from sLTL, sCTL and sCTL* into LTL, CTL and CTL*, respectively, are defined, and theorems for embedding sLTL, sCTL and sCTL* into LTL, CTL and CTL*, respectively, are proved using these translations. Findings These embedding theorems allow us to reuse the standard LTL-, CTL-, and CTL*-based model-checking algorithms to verify hierarchical systems that are modeled and specified by sLTL, sCTL and sCTL*. Originality/value The new logics sLTL, sCTL and sCTL* and their translations are developed, and some illustrative examples of hierarchical model checking are presented based on these logics and translations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document