Auf dem Weg zum Erfolg: Ebene 2 und 3 des Capability Maturity Models

1993 ◽  
pp. 183-251
Author(s):  
Georg Erwin Thaller
Keyword(s):  
Maturity Models ◽  
Capability Maturity

Tailoring software process capability/maturity models for the health domain

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim ◽  
Aldo von Wangenheim ◽  
Fergal McCaffery ◽  
Jean Carlo R. Hauck ◽  
Luigi Buglione
Keyword(s):  
Software Process ◽  
Process Capability ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Health Domain ◽  
Capability Maturity

A comparative study on asset management capability maturity models

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nateque Mahmood ◽  
Subas Dhakal ◽  
Anna Wiewiora ◽  
Kerry Brown ◽  
Robyn Keast
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Management Capability

scholarly journals An Evolutionary Software Project Management Maturity Model for Mauritius

10.28945/3158 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneerav Sukhoo ◽  
Andries Barnard ◽  
Mariki Eloff ◽  
John Andrew van der Poll
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Software Project Management ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Software Professionals ◽  
Western European

Software project management is a relatively recent discipline that emerged during the second half of the 20th century (Kwak, 2003). Many of the software project management methodologies available today were developed in Western/European countries and research showed that there was a need to formalise a software project management framework for developing countries, in particular Africa (Muriithi & Crawford, 2003). Based on surveys and discussions with software professionals, a methodology for software project management is being proposed. The methodology is based on a maturity model as Mauritius is faced with a shortage in skilled professionals. So far, few organisations in Mauritius have been found to be using software project management methodologies developed in Western/European countries. Most maturity models, for example Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and Kerzner’s maturity model, have five maturity levels. The trend is towards the development of maturity models that have fewer maturity levels. For example, the Organisational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) and Prince 2 Maturity Model have been developed with three maturity levels.

scholarly journals A Holistic Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment Framework for Higher Education Institutions in the United Kingdom

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3660
Author(s):  
Aliyu Aliyu ◽  
Leandros Maglaras ◽  
Ying He ◽  
Iryna Yevseyeva ◽  
Eerke Boiten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Assessment Framework ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Maturity Assessment

As organisations are vulnerable to cyberattacks, their protection becomes a significant issue. Capability Maturity Models can enable organisations to benchmark current maturity levels against best practices. Although many maturity models have been already proposed in the literature, a need for models that integrate several regulations exists. This article presents a light, web-based model that can be used as a cybersecurity assessment tool for Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) of the United Kingdom. The novel Holistic Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment Framework incorporates all security regulations, privacy regulations, and best practices that HEIs must be compliant to, and can be used as a self assessment or a cybersecurity audit tool.

The Adoption and Transformation of Capability Maturity Models in Government

2019 ◽  
pp. 146-159
Author(s):  
Terry F. Buss
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Public Management ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Excellent Opportunity ◽  
The Us ◽  
The World ◽  
Quality Movement ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Engineering Institute

Capability maturity models (CMM), an outgrowth of the decades-old quality movement, and originally developed by Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering Institute for the US Defense Department in the 1980s as a way to improve software engineering, has become the inspiration for similar models addressing every aspect of public management by governments around the world. CMM posits several evolutionary stages that organizations must pass through to achieve increasingly higher levels of capability in achieving quality. Stages are determined by research evidence, expert opinion, best practices, and evaluations. While CMM has produced some impressive gains, it has drawn criticism for lacking a theoretical underpinning, exorbitant costs, being somewhat subjective, and lack of success in many organizations. The field has no universal agreed upon standards, so it may be necessary to create an organization to study and vet various CMM applications. The field as it matures presents an excellent opportunity to study public management in the context of organizations employing CMM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document