Gait Analysis of Normal Persons and Patients with Coxarthrosis Before and After Conservative Therapy and After the Implantation of a Total Hip Endoprosthesis

1995 ◽  
pp. 116-128
Author(s):  
O. Knüsel ◽  
L. Wiedmer
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salih Marangoz ◽  
Bülent Atilla ◽  
Haydar Gök ◽  
Güneş Yavuzer ◽  
Süreyya Ergin ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
Riki Ueki ◽  
Masamori Shigematsu ◽  
Takao Hotokebuchi ◽  
Tsutomu Motooka

Author(s):  
Anatole Vilhelm Wiik ◽  
Adeel Aqil ◽  
Bilal Al-Obaidi ◽  
Mads Brevadt ◽  
Justin Peter Cobb

Abstract Aim The length of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a practical consideration to prevent gait impairment. The aim of this study was to determine if reducing the femoral stem length in THA would lead to impaired gait biomechanics. Methods Patients uniformly with the same brand implant of differing lengths (100 mm vs 140–166 mm) were taken retrospectively from a prospective trial introducing a new short stem. Twelve patients without any other disorder to alter gait besides contralateral differing length stem THA were tested at differing gradients and speed on a validated instrumented treadmill measuring ground reaction forces. An anthropometrically similar group of healthy controls were analysed to compare. Results With the same posterior surgical approach, the offset and length of both hips were reconstructed within 5 mm of each other with an identical mean head size of 36 mm. The short stem was the last procedure for all the hips with gait analysis occurring at a mean of 31 and 79 months postoperatively for the short and long stem THA, respectively. Gait analysis between limbs of both stem lengths demonstrated no statistical difference during any walking condition. In the 90 gait assessments with three loading variables, the short stem was the favoured side 51% of the time compared 49% for the long stem. Conclusion By testing a range of practical walking activities, no lower limb loading differences can be observed by reducing the femoral stem length. A shorter stem demonstrates equivalence in preference during gait when compared to a reputable conventional stem in total hip arthroplasty.


2003 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G Benedetti ◽  
E Montanari ◽  
F Catani ◽  
G Vicenzi ◽  
A Leardini

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlong Tang ◽  
Richard M. Lovering ◽  
Joseph A. Roche ◽  
Robert J. Bloch ◽  
Nagaraj K. Neerchal ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 1451-1455
Author(s):  
Soussan Khodadadeh ◽  
Stephen M. Eisenstein

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110184
Author(s):  
Andrey A Korytkin ◽  
Younes M El Moudni ◽  
Yana S Novikova ◽  
Kirill A Kovaldov ◽  
Ekaterina A Morozova

Background: The supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach is a muscle sparing surgical technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The literature reports good clinical and functional results of the SuperPATH technique in the short term. We aimed to compare early outcomes and gait analysis of THA using the mini posterior approach (MPA) and supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach. Methods: 44 patients who underwent THA, were randomly allocated to either MPA or SuperPATH. The data were then collected prospectively (preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks). Plain anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis and instrumental gait analysis were obtained. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) were used to assess functional and clinical outcomes. Results: No significant difference was found in patients’ surgical outcomes. Patients in the SuperPATH group had less pain according to the VAS score at follow-up than the MPA group ( p < 0.01). There was also a significant improvement in HHS and HOOS scores for all patients ( p < 0.001) with the SuperPATH group showing superior changes. The comparison of mean differences in gait velocity between preoperative and 6 weeks postoperative result, revealed improvement in the SuperPATH group over the MPA group ( p = 0.06). Limping was more persistent in the MPA group. Kinematic parameters demonstrated improved hip joint excursion slightly higher in the MPA group. There was no significant improvement in kinetic and kinematic parameters at different walking moments for all patients at 6 weeks compared to preoperative gait patterns. Conclusions: SuperPATH and MPA both show excellent results. This study reveals that the SuperPATH technique was associated with lower postoperative pain levels, and higher physical function and quality of life. Improved functional outcomes allowed earlier postoperative rehabilitation and faster recovery. Specific improvement in gait patterns were identified with nonsignificant differences between the 2 approaches at 6 weeks follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document