Equal Treatment for Disabled Persons: The Case of Organ Transplantation

Author(s):  
Robert M. Veatch
1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-327

Disability & ADA: Sixth Circuit Affirms Congressional Intent of Title IIIIn an appeal from a claim brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CO. that Title III's prohibitions do not apply to employer-sponsored benefit plans. The court reasoned that employer- sponsored plans do not qualify under Title III because it prohibits discriminatory practices by places of public accommodation and employer sponsored plans are not goods offered by places of public accommodation. The court also stated that the purpose of the ADA was to prevent discrimination among nondisabled and disabled persons, not to ensure equal treatment for people with different disabilities.


2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-452
Author(s):  
Allyson R. Behm

In 1990, approximately 43 million Americans suffered from mental or physical disabilities. There is no question that disabled Americans face discrimination in their daily lives. However, prior to 1990, disabled individuals were only able to obtain legal redress from discrimination they experienced in the federal arena. As such, many were left with no legal course of action whatsoever. To address this previously unpunished discrimination against disabled persons, President George H. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA” or “the Act”) into law on July 26, 1990. With the purpose of setting forth a “clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities,” the Act placed able-bodied status among other statutorily protected categories such as race, national origin, gender and age. As with legislation protecting other groups victimized by discrimination, Congress, in enacting the ADA, recognized the need for equal treatment of disabled persons in the realm of employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-17
Author(s):  
Emese Balázs-Földi

Since the annexation to the European Union, exceptional attention has been directed to equal opportunities and equal treatment of disadvantaged social groups in Hungary too. The Hungarian state tries to ensure the first and foremost with legal tools. It is, however, not enough to result in lasting changes in the attitude of society. Personal experiences, as well as, positive messages transmitted by others can produce a positive effect on the development of inclusive approaches. With respect to sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. gender, age, school qualification) investigations into this field suggest different research results. The questionnaire data collection took place in three districts of Hungary. The research was aimed at questioning two test groups, on one hand, the employees of social institutions who mainly deal with disadvantaged persons, on the other hand, the residents of the given districts, who have the knowledge and approach of an average citizen.  The ingenuity of the research is put down to the fact that in Hungary there had never been researching to explore the attitudes of social employees. A total of 747 persons filled in the questionnaires, out of which 408 employees in social institutions and 339 district residents. This present study discloses the deeper connections of the research results which are observable between the two test groups’ attitudes to persons with disabilities and sociodemographic characteristics. Its significance is crucial in identifying the characteristics of the colleague playing an actual role in the integration who, as a reference person, with his own personal involvement can promote the integration of disabled persons into workplace communities. In the research of attitudes three well-distinguished clusters were outlined, which were named as follows: accepting, uncertain/indifferent, rejecting. The study investigates what kind of sociodemographic characteristics the residents, and social workers who belong to the three clusters have. Do people who belong to the same cluster posses similar attributes in both test samples?  What kind of attributes has the residents and social workers got who show a higher level of acceptance?  According to the findings of the research, the attitudes of the district residents differ in age, school qualification, and personal experience, whereas in the case of the social workers the difference in attitudes depends on age and school qualification.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mascola ◽  
B. Kubak ◽  
S. Radhakrishna ◽  
T. Mone ◽  
R. Hunter ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney Chapman ◽  
Elizabeth Bigham
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Lee ◽  
Cyd K. Eaton ◽  
Kristin Loiselle Rich ◽  
Bonney Reed-Knight ◽  
Rochelle S. Liverman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document