Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill neonates with reference to the arterial pressure wave shape

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gevers ◽  
H. R. van Genderingen ◽  
H. N. Lafeber ◽  
W. W. M. Hack
1994 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 15A-15A
Author(s):  
Magdalena Gevers ◽  
Huibert R Van Genderinaen ◽  
Harrie N Lafeber ◽  
Willem W Hack

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 793-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Bur ◽  
Harald Herkner ◽  
Marianne Vlcek ◽  
Christian Woisetschläger ◽  
Ulla Derhaschnig ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yi-Tse Hsiao ◽  
Yun-Wen Peng ◽  
Pin Huan Yu

Monitoring blood pressure helps a clinical veterinarian assess various conditions in birds. Blood pressure is not only a bio-indicator of renal or cardiovascular disease but is also a vital indicator for anesthesia. Anesthetic- and sedation-related mortality is higher in birds than dogs or cats. The traditional method of blood pressure measurement in mammals mainly relies on indirect methods. However, indirect blood pressure measurement is not reliable in birds, making the direct method the only gold standard. Although an arterial catheter can provide continuous real-time arterial pressure in birds, the method requires technical skill and is limited by bird size, and is thus not practical in birds with circulatory collapse. Intra-osseous (IO) blood pressure is potentially related to arterial pressure and may be a much easier and safer technique that is less limited by animal size. However, the relationship between IO pressure and arterial blood pressure has not been established. This study used mathematical methods to determine the relationship between IO pressure and arterial blood pressure. The Granger causality (G.C.) theory was applied in the study and used to analyze which pressure signal was leading the other. Our findings suggest that IO pressure is G.C. by arterial blood pressure; thus, the use of IO pressure measurements as an alternative to arterial blood pressure measurement is a rational approach.


Author(s):  
Patrick Magee ◽  
Mark Tooley

Blood pressure measurement occurs either non-invasively or invasively, and usually refers to systemic arterial pressure measurement, but can also refer to systemic venous or pulmonary arterial pressure measurement. In 1733 the Reverend Stephen Hales was the first person to measure the blood pressure in vivo in unanaesthetised horses by direct cannulation of the carotid and femoral arteries. In doing so he observed the pulsatile nature of flow in the circulation. In 1828 Poiseuille developed the mercury manometer, and used it to measure blood pressure in a dog. The mercury manometer has, of course, become the standard technique against which other techniques are compared. The earliest numerical information on blood pressure measurement came from direct rather than indirect measurement in 1856 by Faivre, using Poiseuille’s device. However, in the last part of the nineteenth century, non-invasive measurement techniques were developed. In 1903, Codman and Cushing introduced the concept of routine intraoperative blood pressure measurement, which at the time was a revolutionary concept. Nowadays it is a fundamental part of minimal monitoring criteria. There are several techniques of non-invasive BP (NIBP) measurement, all of which function by occluding the pulse in a limb with a proximal cuff, then detecting its onset again distally, on lowering the cuff pressure. Detection methods include palpation, auscultation, plethysmography, oscillotonometry and oscillometry. Accuracy of all non-invasive techniques depends on cuff size in relation to the limb concerned, and over which artery the cuff is placed. Such techniques of NIBP measurement are necessarily intermittent. Much discussion has taken place on the accuracy of these devices, and the accuracy of diastolic pressure measurements needs improving, and there are ideas proposed for new non-invasive devices [Tooley and Magee 2009]. In the absence of a stethoscope, this technique is simple and reliable. After inflating the cuff on the upper arm to a pressure of above that of systolic, the cuff is then deflated while palpating the brachial artery and the systolic pressure is measured with a mercury column at first detection of the pulse. A study by van Bergen [1954] showed that BP can be underestimated by this method by up to 25% at 120 mmHg.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document