Blinks as an index of cognitive activity during reading

1991 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lois N. Orchard ◽  
John A. Stern
2021 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 103342
Author(s):  
Julia N. Czerniak ◽  
Nikolas Schierhorst ◽  
Valeria Villani ◽  
Lorenzo Sabattini ◽  
Christopher Brandl ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 994
Author(s):  
Hannes Devos ◽  
Kathleen Gustafson ◽  
Pedram Ahmadnezhad ◽  
Ke Liao ◽  
Jonathan D. Mahnken ◽  
...  

Cognitive workload is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of performance in cognitive tests and daily life activities. Cognitive workload is a measure of physical and mental effort allocation to a task, which can be determined through self-report or physiological measures. However, the reliability and validity of these measures have not been established in older adults with a wide range of cognitive ability. The aim of this study was to establish the test–retest reliability of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA), extracted from pupillary size. The convergent validity of these measures against event-related potentials (ERPs) was also investigated. A total of 38 individuals with scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment ranging between 17 and 30 completed a working memory test (n-back) with three levels of difficulty at baseline and at a two-week follow-up. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values of the NASA-TLX ranged between 0.71 and 0.81, demonstrating good to excellent reliability. The mean ICA scores showed fair to good reliability, with ICCs ranging between 0.56 and 0.73. The mean ICA and NASA-TLX scores showed significant and moderate correlations (Pearson’s r ranging between 0.30 and 0.33) with the third positive peak of the ERP at the midline channels. We conclude that ICA and NASA-TLX are reliable measures of cognitive workload in older adults. Further research is needed in dissecting the subjective and objective constructs of cognitive workload.


2021 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 103402
Author(s):  
Julia N. Czerniak ◽  
Nikolas Schierhorst ◽  
Christopher Brandl ◽  
Alexander Mertens ◽  
Maximilian Schwalm ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agata Wytykowska

In Strelau’s theory of temperament (RTT), there are four types of temperament, differentiated according to low vs. high stimulation processing capacity and to the level of their internal harmonization. The type of temperament is considered harmonized when the constellation of all temperamental traits is internally matched to the need for stimulation, which is related to effectiveness of stimulation processing. In nonharmonized temperamental structure, an internal mismatch is observed which is linked to ineffectiveness of stimulation processing. The three studies presented here investigated the relationship between temperamental structures and the strategies of categorization. Results revealed that subjects with harmonized structures efficiently control the level of stimulation stemming from the cognitive activity, independent of the affective value of situation. The pattern of results attained for subjects with nonharmonized structures was more ambiguous: They were as good as subjects with harmonized structures at adjusting the way of information processing to their stimulation processing capacities, but they also proved to be more responsive to the affective character of stimulation (positive or negative mood).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document