Regional variation of cancer mortality incidence and its relation to selenium levels in China

1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Yu Yu ◽  
Ya-Jun Chu ◽  
Xin-Lan Gong ◽  
Chong Hou ◽  
Wen-Guang Li ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1701-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanqing Chen ◽  
Mark Clements ◽  
Bayzidur Rahman ◽  
Siwei Zhang ◽  
Youlin Qiao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 63-67
Author(s):  
Alicja Klimczak ◽  
Bogumiła Kempińska-Mirosławska ◽  
Michał Mik ◽  
Łukasz Dziki ◽  
Adam Dziki

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopal K. Singh ◽  
Ahmedin Jemal

We analyzed socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in US mortality, incidence, and survival rates from all-cancers combined and major cancers from 1950 to 2014. Census-based deprivation indices were linked to national mortality and cancer data for area-based socioeconomic patterns in mortality, incidence, and survival. The National Longitudinal Mortality Study was used to analyze individual-level socioeconomic and racial/ethnic patterns in mortality. Rates, risk-ratios, least squares, log-linear, and Cox regression were used to examine trends and differentials. Socioeconomic patterns in all-cancer, lung, and colorectal cancer mortality changed dramatically over time. Individuals in more deprived areas or lower education and income groups had higher mortality and incidence rates than their more affluent counterparts, with excess risk being particularly marked for lung, colorectal, cervical, stomach, and liver cancer. Education and income inequalities in mortality from all-cancers, lung, prostate, and cervical cancer increased during 1979–2011. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality widened as mortality in lower socioeconomic groups/areas declined more slowly. Mortality was higher among Blacks and lower among Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics than Whites. Cancer patient survival was significantly lower in more deprived neighborhoods and among most ethnic-minority groups. Cancer mortality and incidence disparities may reflect inequalities in smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, diet, alcohol use, screening, and treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 367-381
Author(s):  
Claudia Santucci ◽  
Greta Carioli ◽  
Paola Bertuccio ◽  
Matteo Malvezzi ◽  
Ugo Pastorino ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joséphine Bryere ◽  
◽  
Laure Tron ◽  
Gwenn Menvielle ◽  
Guy Launoy

Abstract Background To determine relevant public health actions and to guide intervention priorities, it is of great importance to assess the relative contribution of incidence and lethality to social inequalities in cancer mortality. Methods The study population comprised 185,518 cases of cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2009 recorded in the French registries. Survival was known for each patient (endpoint: 30/06/2013). Deprivation was assessed using the European Deprivation Index. We studied the influence of deprivation on mortality, incidence and lethality rates and quantified the respective proportions of incidence and lethality in social inequalities in mortality by calculating attributable deaths. Results For cancers with social inequalities both in incidence and lethality, excess mortality in deprived was mainly caused by social inequalities in incidence (e.g. men lung cancer: 87% of excess deaths in the deprived caused by inequalities in incidence). Proportions were more balanced for some cancer sites (e.g. cervical cancer: 56% incidence, 44% lethality). For cancer sites with a higher incidence in the least deprived (e.g. breast cancer), the excess-lethality in deprived leads entirely the higher mortality among the deprived. Conclusions Most of the excess mortality in deprived is due to the excess incidence of tobacco-dependent cancers and the excess lethality of screenable cancers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document