Co-immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and taurolidine for progressive metastatic melanoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. O’Brien ◽  
R. A. Cahill ◽  
D. J. Bouchier-Hayes ◽  
H. P. Redmond
1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 330-333
Author(s):  
Dummer ◽  
Nestle ◽  
Hofbauer ◽  
Burg

Das metastasierende Melanom (MM) gehört zu den schwierig behandelbaren Malignomen, wobei Allgemeinzustand und Motivation des Patienten neben Zahl und Lokalisation der Metastasen das therapeutische Vorgehen bestimmen. Solitäre Metastasen in Lunge, ZNS, Weichteilen und Lymphknoten sollten primär chirurgisch entfernt werden. Multiple Metastasen, insbesondere abdominal, werden nur in Ausnahmefällen chirurgisch angegangen. Hier ist vielmehr ein systemische Chemoimmuntherapie angebracht. Aussichtsreiche Behandlungskonzepte beinhalten Interleukin-2, Interferon, und verschiedenen Zytostatika wie DTIC, Temozolamid, Vindesine oder Cisplatin. Bei ZNS- und Skelettfiliae ist die Radiotherapie einzusetzen. Durch diese Chemoimmuntherapien hat sich die Prognose des metastasierenden Melanoms bezüglich des Überlebens verbessert. Langfristig wird aber nur eine Kombination von zeitraubenden Multicenterstudien und experimentellen Ansätzen in der Lage sein, uns langsam an eine kurative Therapie heranzuführen.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 888-892
Author(s):  
Joseph I Clark ◽  
Brendan Curti ◽  
Elizabeth J Davis ◽  
Howard Kaufman ◽  
Asim Amin ◽  
...  

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) was approved in the 1990s after demonstrating durable complete responses (CRs) in some patients with metastatic melanoma (mM) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients who achieve this level of disease control have also demonstrated improved survival compared with patients who progress, but limited data are available describing the long-term course. The aim of this study was to better characterize long-term survival following successful HD IL-2 treatment in patients with no subsequent systemic therapy. Eleven HD IL-2 treatment centers identified patients with survival ≥5 years after HD IL-2, with no subsequent systemic therapy. Survival was evaluated from the date of IL-2 treatment to June 2017. Treatment courses consisted of 2 1-week cycles of HD IL-2. Patients were treated with HD IL-2 alone, or HD IL-2 followed by local therapy to achieve maximal response. 100 patients are reported: 54 patients with mM and 46 patients with mRCC. Progression-free survival (PFS) after HD IL-2 ranges from 5+ years to 30+ years, with a median follow-up of 10+ years. 27 mRCC and 32 mM are alive ≥10 years after IL-2. Thus, a small subset of patients with mM and mRCC achieve long-term PFS (≥5 years) after treatment with HD IL-2 as their only systemic therapy. The ability of HD IL-2 therapy to induce prolonged PFS should be a major consideration in studies of new immunotherapy combinations for mM and mRCC.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miki Shirakawa Garcia ◽  
Yoko Ono ◽  
Steve R. Martinez ◽  
Steven L. Chen ◽  
Heidi Goodarzi ◽  
...  

Biotherapy ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna W. Baars ◽  
Johanna C. M. Fonk ◽  
Riekeld J. Scheper ◽  
B. Mary E. von Blomberg-van der Flier ◽  
Herman Bril ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos E. Marroquin ◽  
Donald E. White ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Steven A. Rosenberg ◽  
Douglas J. Schwartzentruber

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 484-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Petrella ◽  
Ian Quirt ◽  
Shailendra Verma ◽  
Adam E. Haynes ◽  
Manya Charette ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1821-1830 ◽  
Author(s):  
P A Demchak ◽  
J W Mier ◽  
N J Robert ◽  
K O'Brien ◽  
J A Gould ◽  
...  

In this pilot study of metastatic melanoma, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy were combined using an alternating schedule designed to explore potential synergism between these modalities. Bolus IL-2 was given at a dose of 600,000 IU/kg intravenously (IV) every 8 hours, days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19, followed by high-dose CDDP administered by two different regimens: (A) 135 to 150 mg/m2 IV bolus over 30 minutes with the chemoprotectant WR-2721 910 mg/m2 or (B) 50 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours every day for 3 days. The trial design allowed an assessment of response to each phase of therapy. Among 27 assessable patients, there were 10 (37%) overall responses, including three (11%) complete responses (CRs) with durations of 9, 16, and 30+ months. Tumor regression was noted in seven patients (partial response [PR], four; minor response [MR], three; response rate [RR], four of 27 [15%]) after IL-2 administration and in 14 patients (PR, 12; MR, two; RR, 12 of 27 [44%]) after CDDP treatment, demonstrating noncrossresistance between the components of the regimen. Major PRs (greater than 90% reduction of tumor burden) or CRs were only seen in patients responding to IL-2. Toxicity during IL-2 therapy was typical for high-dose IL-2 protocols and was reversible. Among the first 20 patients treated with CDDP regimen A, there were eight episodes of grade IV nephrotoxicity (creatinine level greater than 5.0 mg/dL), including three of six patients treated with an initial CDDP dose of 135 mg/m2. This side effect was more frequent among patients with liver metastasis (P less than .05, Fisher's exact test). No significant nephrotoxicity was noted in seven patients treated on regimen B. Although ototoxicity was frequent, minimal bone marrow and neurologic toxicity was noted. There were no treatment-related deaths. This combination showed at least additive activity against melanoma, and the more protracted CDDP schedule was well tolerated. This regimen may serve as a model for future combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy trials in metastatic melanoma.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 910-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
N M Bleehen ◽  
E S Newlands ◽  
S M Lee ◽  
N Thatcher ◽  
P Selby ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Sixty patients with metastatic melanoma were treated in a phase II study with the imidazotetrazine derivative temozolamide to assess further the efficacy demonstrated in previous phase I studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-five of 56 eligible patients were assessable for toxicity and 49 for response. The patients received temozolomide 150 mg/m2/d over 5 successive days orally (total dose, 750 mg/m2) in the first course. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks and the dose was escalated to 200 mg/m2/d x 5 (total dose, 1 g/m2) after the first course if toxicity was acceptable. Patients were all chemotherapy-naive, except for two who had previously received interferon alfa and one who had received interleukin-2 (the latter patient had also received two phase I drugs some time previously). RESULTS A complete response (CR) was documented in three patients (all with lung metastases) and a partial response (PR) in nine patients (21% CR plus PR rate). Seven of 56 patients were not assessable for response because of early death or deterioration. The overall response rate excluding these patients is 12 of 49 (24%). The median response duration was 6 months (range, 2.5 to 22+). Toxicity of the regimen, which was mainly hematopoietic, was low. The median survival duration for all patients was 5.5 months (range, 0.5 to 29.5). For responders, the median survival duration was 14.5 months (range, 3 to 28+), with four patients still alive. CONCLUSION Temozolomide in the schedule used has as good activity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic melanoma as the other most active agents currently in use. Further studies of the drug on its own and in combination with other agents is recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document