scholarly journals Blunted striatal response to monetary reward anticipation during smoking abstinence predicts lapse during a contingency-managed quit attempt

2015 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. 751-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie M. Sweitzer ◽  
Charles F. Geier ◽  
Rachel Denlinger ◽  
Erika E. Forbes ◽  
Bethany R. Raiff ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e89954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Votinov ◽  
Juergen Pripfl ◽  
Christian Windischberger ◽  
Klaudius Kalcher ◽  
Alexander Zimprich ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 1925-1926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Murphy ◽  
◽  
Liam J Nestor ◽  
John McGonigle ◽  
Louise Paterson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieneke K Janssen ◽  
Iris Duif ◽  
Anne EM Speckens ◽  
Ilke van Loon ◽  
Jeanne HM de Vries ◽  
...  

AbstractObesity is a highly prevalent disease, usually resulting from chronic overeating. Accumulating evidence suggests that increased neural responses during the anticipation of high caloric food play an important role in overeating. A promising method to counteract enhanced food anticipation in overeating might be mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). However, how MBIs can affect food reward anticipation neurally has never been studied. In this randomized, actively controlled study we aimed to investigate whether an 8-week mindful eating intervention decreases reward anticipation in striatal and midbrain reward regions. Using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, we tested 58 healthy subjects with a wide body mass index range (BMI: 19-35 kg/m2), who were motivated to change their eating behavior. During scanning they performed an incentive delay task, measuring neural reward anticipation responses to caloric and monetary cues before and after 8 weeks of mindful eating or educational cooking (active control). Relative to educational cooking (active control), mindful eating decreased reward anticipation responses to food, but not to monetary reward cues, in the midbrain, but not the striatum. The effects were specific to reward anticipation and did not extend to reward receipt. These results show that an 8-week mindful eating intervention may decrease the salience of food cues specifically, which could result in decreased food-cue triggered overeating on the long term.Significance statementMindfulness-based interventions have been shown effective in reducing disordered eating behavior in clinical as well as non-clinical populations. Here, we present the first randomized actively controlled study investigating the effects of mindfulness on reward anticipation in the brain. Using fMRI we show that midbrain responses to caloric, but not monetary, reward cues are reduced following an 8-week intervention of mindful eating relative to educational cooking (active control). Mindful eating interventions may thus be promising in counteracting reward cue-driven overeating, particularly in our obesogenic environment with food cues everywhere. Moreover, our data show that specific mindfulness-based interventions can target specific reward-cue responses in the brain, which might be relevant in other compulsive behaviors such as addiction.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255292
Author(s):  
S. Jauhar ◽  
L. Fortea ◽  
A. Solanes ◽  
A. Albajes-Eizagirre ◽  
P. J. McKenna ◽  
...  

Background While multiple studies have examined the brain functional correlates of reward, meta-analyses have either focused on studies using the monetary incentive delay (MID) task, or have adopted a broad strategy, combining data from studies using both monetary and non-monetary reward, as probed using a wide range of tasks. Objective To meta-analyze fMRI studies that used monetary reward and in which there was a definable cue-reward contingency. Studies were limited to those using monetary reward in order to avoid potential heterogeneity from use of other rewards, especially social rewards. Studies using gambling or delay discounting tasks were excluded on the grounds that reward anticipation is not easily quantifiable. Study eligibility English-language fMRI studies (i) that reported fMRI findings on healthy adults; (ii) that used monetary reward; and (iii) in which a cue that was predictive of reward was compared to a no win (or lesser win) condition. Only voxel-based studies were included; those where brain coverage was incomplete were excluded. Data sources Ovid, Medline and PsycInfo, from 2000 to 2020, plus checking of review articles and meta-analyses. Data synthesis Data were pooled using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI). Heterogeneity among studies was examined using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and statistical examination of asymmetries. Moderator variables including whether the task was pre-learnt, sex distribution, amount of money won and width of smoothing kernel were examined. Results Pooled data from 45 studies of reward anticipation revealed activations in the ventral striatum, the middle cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area and the insula. Pooled data from 28 studies of reward delivery again revealed ventral striatal activation, plus cortical activations in the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex. There was relatively little evidence of publication bias. Among moderating variables, only whether the task was pre-learnt exerted an influence. Conclusions According to this meta-analysis monetary reward anticipation and delivery both activate the ventral but not the dorsal striatum, and are associated with different patterns of cortical activation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1559-1559
Author(s):  
Anna Murphy ◽  
◽  
Liam J Nestor ◽  
John McGonigle ◽  
Louise Paterson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-99
Author(s):  
Yumiko Ikeda ◽  
Amane Tateno ◽  
Yoshiro Okubo ◽  
Hidenori Suzuki

Author(s):  
Joseph W Ditre ◽  
Bryan W Heckman ◽  
Lisa R LaRowe ◽  
Jessica M Powers

Abstract Introduction Pain and cigarette smoking are highly prevalent and frequently co-occurring conditions that interact in the manner of a positive feedback loop. Despite initial evidence that smokers with co-occurring pain may experience greater difficulty quitting, we are unaware of previous research that has tested prospective associations between pain status and the attainment of smoking cessation milestones. Aims and Methods This study examined past 2-week pain status as a predictor of cessation milestones among current smokers who were motivated to quit (Sample 1; N = 301) and smokers who recently initiated a cessation attempt (Sample 2; N = 242). Cessation milestones included initiation of a quit attempt and 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA; Sample 1), lapse/relapse (Sample 2), and 7-day PPA at 2-month follow-up (both samples). Indirect associations between pain status and cessation milestones via confidence in quitting and nicotine withdrawal were also examined. Results Smokers with pain (vs. no pain) were as follows: less likely to initiate a quit attempt and achieve 7-day PPA; more likely to lapse and/or relapse; and less likely to report 7-day PPA at follow-up. Pain status was indirectly associated with latency cessation milestones via confidence in quitting and with latency to lapse via withdrawal severity. Conclusions This study demonstrated that pain status can predict smoking cessation outcomes. Clinical implications include the need to assess pain in the context of quitting and that smokers with co-occurring pain may benefit from tailored/integrated cessation interventions. Implications A growing empirical literature indicates that the presence of co-occurring pain probably contributes to the maintenance of cigarette dependence. The current results provide novel evidence that smokers with co-occurring past 2-week pain are less likely to initiate a quit attempt and maintain smoking abstinence than smokers without co-occurring pain. These findings suggest that smokers with pain face unique barriers to quitting and underscore the utility of assessing and addressing pain among all smokers who are planning a smoking cessation attempt.


2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 681-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie M. Sweitzer ◽  
Charles F. Geier ◽  
Danielle L. Joel ◽  
Patrick McGurrin ◽  
Rachel L. Denlinger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document