scholarly journals Role of sex hormones in modulating myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve

Author(s):  
Ahmed Haider ◽  
Susan Bengs ◽  
Angela Portmann ◽  
Alexia Rossi ◽  
Hazem Ahmed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A growing body of evidence highlights sex differences in the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular imaging modalities. Nonetheless, the role of sex hormones in modulating myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve (CFR) is currently unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of female and male sex hormones on myocardial perfusion and CFR. Methods Rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was conducted by small animal positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]flurpiridaz in a total of 56 mice (7–8 months old) including gonadectomized (Gx) and sham-operated males and females, respectively. Myocardial [18F]flurpiridaz uptake (% injected dose per mL, % ID/mL) was used as a surrogate for myocardial perfusion at rest and following intravenous regadenoson injection, as previously reported. Apparent coronary flow reserve (CFRApp) was calculated as the ratio of stress and rest myocardial perfusion. Left ventricular (LV) morphology and function were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Results Orchiectomy resulted in a significant decrease of resting myocardial perfusion (Gx vs. sham, 19.4 ± 1.0 vs. 22.2 ± 0.7 % ID/mL, p = 0.034), while myocardial perfusion at stress remained unchanged (Gx vs. sham, 27.5 ± 1.2 vs. 27.3 ± 1.2 % ID/mL, p = 0.896). Accordingly, CFRApp was substantially higher in orchiectomized males (Gx vs. sham, 1.43 ± 0.04 vs. 1.23 ± 0.05, p = 0.004), and low serum testosterone levels were linked to a blunted resting myocardial perfusion (r = 0.438, p = 0.020) as well as an enhanced CFRApp (r = −0.500, p = 0.007). In contrast, oophorectomy did not affect myocardial perfusion in females. Of note, orchiectomized males showed a reduced LV mass, stroke volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on CMR, while no such effects were observed in oophorectomized females. Conclusion Our experimental data in mice indicate that sex differences in myocardial perfusion are primarily driven by testosterone. Given the diagnostic importance of PET-MPI in clinical routine, further studies are warranted to determine whether testosterone levels affect the interpretation of myocardial perfusion findings in patients.

Author(s):  
Ping Wu ◽  
Xiaoli Zhang ◽  
Zhifang Wu ◽  
Huanzhen Chen ◽  
Xiaoshan Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Recently, a “U” hazard ratio curve between resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prognosis has been observed in patients referred for routine clinical echocardiograms. The present study sought to explore whether a similar “U” curve existed between resting LVEF and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients without severe cardiovascular disease (CVD) and whether impaired CFR played a role in the adverse outcome of patients with supra-normal LVEF (snLVEF, LVEF ≥ 65%). Methods Two hundred ten consecutive patients (mean age 52.3 ± 9.3 years, 104 women) without severe CVD underwent clinically indicated rest/dipyridamole stress electrocardiography (ECG)-gated 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were followed up for 27.3 ± 9.5 months, including heart failure, late revascularization, re-hospitalization, and re-coronary angiography for any cardiac reason. Clinical characteristics, corrected CFR (cCFR), and MACE were compared among the three groups categorized by resting LVEF detected by PET/CT. Dose–response analyses using restricted cubic spline (RCS) functions, multivariate logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were conducted to evaluate the relationship between resting LVEF and CFR/outcome. Results An inverted “U” curve existed between resting LVEF and cCFR (p = 0.06). Both patients with snLVEF (n = 38) and with reduced LVEF (rLVEF, LVEF < 55%) (n = 66) displayed a higher incidence of reduced cCFR than those with normal LVEF (nLVEF, 55% ≤ LVEF < 65%) (n = 106) (57.9% vs 54.5% vs 34.3%, p < 0.01, respectively). Both snLVEF (p < 0.01) and rLVEF (p < 0.05) remained independent predictors for reduced cCFR after multivariable adjustment. Patients with snLVEF encountered more MACE than those with nLVEF (10.5% vs 0.9%, log-rank p = 0.01). Conclusions Patients with snLVEF are prone to impaired cCFR, which may be related to the adverse prognosis. Further investigations are warranted to explore its underlying pathological mechanism and clinical significance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 303 (10) ◽  
pp. H1199-H1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieyun You ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Junbo Ge ◽  
Yunzeng Zou

Adenosine and high-concentration isoflurane are commonly used to induce hyperemia for assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) in mice, but high-concentration isoflurane may exacerbate cardiac dysfunction, leading to impaired CFR. However, there is no study be found comparing the effects of adenosine and isoflurane on CFR and corresponding cardiac function. High-resolution echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment were performed in 20 mice 2 wk after transverse aortic constriction (TAC), aortic regurgitation (AR), and corresponding sham operation. CFR was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to basal peak diastolic velocity (CFRpdv) or diastolic velocity-time integral (CFRdvti). In the sham-operated mice, no differences were observed between the effects of adenosine and isoflurane on CFR, left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction and fractional shortening), left ventricular end-systolic pressure, maximal contraction and relaxation velocity (+dp/d t and −dp/d t), alteration of left ventricular pressure (ΔLVP), or ± dp/d t (Δdp/d t). But adenosine-derived results were significantly higher than isoflurane-derived ones in both the TAC and the AR groups. Moreover, CFRpdv or CFRdvti was positively correlated with both LVEF and LVFS. Compared with adenosine-derived CFR, isoflurane-derived CFR may be underestimated in the TAC and the AR mice, which is probably associated with suppressed cardiac function.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zorica Mladenovic ◽  
Ana Djordjevic-Dikic ◽  
Dragan Tavciovski ◽  
Andjelka Ristic Angelkov ◽  
Zoran Jovic ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Garcia ◽  
Paolo G. Camici ◽  
Louis-Gilles Durand ◽  
Kim Rajappan ◽  
Emmanuel Gaillard ◽  
...  

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is markedly reduced in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), but the exact mechanisms underlying this impairment of CFR in AS remain unclear. Reduced CFR is the key mechanism leading to myocardial ischemia symptoms and adverse outcomes in AS patients. The objective of this study was to develop an explicit mathematical model formulated with a limited number of parameters that describes the effect of AS on left coronary inflow patterns and CFR. We combined the mathematical V3 (ventricular-valvular-vascular) model with a new lumped-parameter model of coronary inflow. One thousand Monte-Carlo computational simulations with AS graded from mild up to very severe were performed within a wide range of physiological conditions. There was a good agreement between the CFR values computed with this new model and those measured in 24 patients with isolated AS ( r = 0.77, P < 10−4). A global sensitivity analysis showed that the valve effective orifice area (EOA) was the major physiological determinant of CFR (total sensitivity index = 0.87). CFR was markedly reduced when AS became severe, i.e., when EOA was <1.0 cm2, and was generally exhausted when the EOA was <0.5–0.6 cm2. The reduction of CFR that is associated with AS can be explained by the concomitance of 1) reduced myocardial supply as a result of decreased coronary perfusion pressure, and 2) increased myocardial metabolic demand as a result of increased left ventricular workload.


1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1860-1871 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. A. GELDOF ◽  
M. J. SCHALU ◽  
V. MANGER CATS ◽  
P. M. J. VAN DER ZWET ◽  
P. STEENDUK ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document