Food intake rate and delivery strategy in aquaculture

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267
Author(s):  
Kui You ◽  
Caihua Ma ◽  
Huiwang Gao ◽  
Fengqi Li ◽  
Meizhao Zhang ◽  
...  
1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom W. Gettys ◽  
Susan Mills ◽  
Donald M. Henrickst

1. Two experimental approaches were employed to assess the relation between food consumption rate and maintenance requirements in male weanling rats. The first approach involved restricting food intake in rats previously given free access to food from weaning to 59 d of age. The second approach involved restriction of food intake to various levels after weaning. Maintenance requirements (g foodid per g body-weight (W)) were estimated by dividing the rate of food consumption by the resulting equilibrium W (EBW) for each animal. In addition, food consumption was partitioned into growth-independent (maintenance) and growth-dependent (gain) components by alternately setting W and specific growth rate (W') to zero in an equation relating food intake rate to W and W. Coupling coefficients representing maintenance consumption (g food/d per g W) and gain consumption (g food/g gain) were estimated for each animal by least squares.2. Both techniques for estimating maintenance consumption provided similar estimates within and across experiments, and regardless of when food restriction was imposed or its severity, consumption for maintenance was about 5% W/d.3. The EBW to which animals in each treatment group aspired was directly proportional to that group's food intake rate.4. Coventional measures of growth efficiency were also related to food intake; efficiency decreased with decreasing food intake. Partitioning food consumption into maintenance and gain components revealed that as the rate of food intake decreased, the proportion of total intake consumed for maintenance increased. The results suggest that growth efficiency declines during food intake restriction because proportionately more of total intake is used for maintenance, leaving less available for gain.


2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUY BEAUCHAMP

1963 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
JB Coombe ◽  
DE Tribe

Three experiments with sheep were carried out to investigate the effect of urea, added to a diet of straw plus molasses, on roughage intake and digestion, and on the nitrogen status of the animal. Urea, added to straw and molasses at the level of 3% of the amount of straw, increased the ad libitum food intake, rate of cellulose (cotton thread) digestion in the rumen, and rate of passage of food through the gut. When different amounts of urea were fed, the highest levels of intake, rate of cellulose digestion, and rate of passage occurred with 8–16 g urea per sheep per day. Increasing the amount of urea fed to 32 g per day caused significant decreases in rate of passage and intake, within diets containing urea. These were not accompanied by significant changes in rate of cellulose digestion in the rumen. With diets of straw and molasses, with and without urea, crude fibre digestibility was positively correlated with the rate of cellulose digestion in the rumen. Voluntary intake of these diets was positively correlated with rate of passage. When the effect of rate of passage was eliminated, voluntary intake was not significantly correlated with the rate of cellulose digestion in the rumen. Under the feeding conditions used in these experiments, once sufficient urea had been added to the diet to bring the animal into a small, positive nitrogen balance, additional dietary nitrogen supplied as urea was practically all excreted in the urine. It is concluded that, under these feeding conditions, the primary function of a urea supplement is to enable an animal to maintain nitrogen equilibrium rather than store significant amounts of nitrogen in the body.


Behaviour ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (14) ◽  
pp. 1665-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Pascual ◽  
Juan Carlos Senar

Many investigations have studied the effects of predation risk and competition over vigilance and feeding success, but they have proven to be difficult to discriminate. Moreover, none of the studies that have avoided the confusion has considered all the vigilance variables, food intake rate and time spent in the foraging patch. In this study, we designed an experiment with Eurasian siskinsCarduelis spinusforaging on three bird table feeders: one with low predation risk and competition, one with low predation risk and high competition and one with high predation risk and intermediate competition. Birds responded to increasing interference competition by increasing mean scan durations (probably due to the birds having to be vigilant for both other flock members and predators) and maintaining the length of mean inter-scan durations, while they responded to increasing predation risk by reducing mean inter-scan durations (probably in order to detect the predator sooner) while maintaining similar length of mean scan durations. Birds were often ejected from the feeder or departed because of disturbances, so time spent on feeders was reduced both because of competition and predation risk. Pecking rates were affected by competition but not by predation risk. Our results clearly show that birds vigilance strategy while foraging might be very different when they are mainly concerned with scanning for predators or when they primarily monitor competing flock companions. In addition, they stress the importance of recording all the vigilance and feeding variables when studying the effect of ecological factors over the foraging behaviour of birds.


1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 2225-2231 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sherman Boates ◽  
John D. Goss-Custard

On the mudflats of the Exe Estuary in southwest England, oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus switched from eating worms Nereis diversicolor to clams Scrobicularia plana during autumn. A decline in the profitability of worms (from 17 to 4 mg/s handling time) and the food intake of oystercatchers eating worms (from 1300 to < 200 mg/15 min) occurred prior to and during the switch to clams. Declines in profitability and food intake rate were due to seasonal changes in the size and food value of worms available to oystercatchers. Capture rate on worms varied little prior to, or during, the switch. Oystercatchers appeared to switch diets in response to changes in the reward offered by worms rather than in response to relative changes in the reward offered by the two prey species. This is because individual oystercatchers were never observed eating a mixed diet of worms and clams, and may explain why it took 6 weeks (11 October to 25 November) for the population to complete the switch.


Ibis ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK CEZILLY ◽  
ISMAEL KEDDAR

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-211
Author(s):  
Qusay H. Al-hamadany ◽  
Amer A. Jabir ◽  
Nawras A. Al-Faiz Sagad A. Abd Alha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document