scholarly journals Measuring auditory cortical responses in Tursiops truncatus

Author(s):  
Matt D. Schalles ◽  
Dorian S. Houser ◽  
James J. Finneran ◽  
Peter Tyack ◽  
Barbara Shinn-Cunningham ◽  
...  

AbstractAuditory neuroscience in dolphins has largely focused on auditory brainstem responses; however, such measures reveal little about the cognitive processes dolphins employ during echolocation and acoustic communication. The few previous studies of mid- and long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in dolphins report different latencies, polarities, and magnitudes. These inconsistencies may be due to any number of differences in methodology, but these studies do not make it clear which methodological differences may account for the disparities. The present study evaluates how electrode placement and pre-processing methods affect mid- and long-latency AEPs in (Tursiops truncatus). AEPs were measured when reference electrodes were placed on the skin surface over the forehead, the external auditory meatus, or the dorsal surface anterior to the dorsal fin. Data were pre-processed with or without a digital 50-Hz low-pass filter, and the use of independent component analysis to isolate signal components related to neural processes from other signals. Results suggest that a meatus reference electrode provides the highest quality AEP signals for analyses in sensor space, whereas a dorsal reference yielded nominal improvements in component space. These results provide guidance for measuring cortical AEPs in dolphins, supporting future studies of their cognitive auditory processing.

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 708-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Finneran ◽  
Jason Mulsow ◽  
Ryan Jones ◽  
Dorian S. Houser ◽  
Robert F. Burkard

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 2914-2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Finneran ◽  
Jason Mulsow ◽  
Dorian S. Houser ◽  
Robert F. Burkard

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251363
Author(s):  
Dennis McFadden ◽  
Craig A. Champlin ◽  
Michelle H. Pho ◽  
Edward G. Pasanen ◽  
Mindy M. Maloney ◽  
...  

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and auditory middle-latency responses (AMLRs) to a click stimulus were measured in about 100 subjects. Of interest were the sex differences in those auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), the correlations between the various AEP measures, and the correlations between the AEP measures and measures of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and behavioral performance also measured on the same subjects. Also of interest was how the menstrual cycle affected the various AEP measures. Most ABR measures and several AMLR measures exhibited sex differences, and many of the former were substantial. The sex differences tended to be larger for latency than for amplitude of the waves, and they tended to be larger for a weak click stimulus than for a strong click. The largest sex difference was for Wave-V latency (effect size ~1.2). When subjects were dichotomized into Non-Whites and Whites, the race differences in AEPs were small within sex. However, sex and race interacted so that the sex differences often were larger for the White subjects than for the Non-White subjects, particularly for the latency measures. Contrary to the literature, no AEP measures differed markedly across the menstrual cycle. Correlations between various AEP measures, and between AEP and OAE measures, were small and showed no consistent patterns across sex or race categories. Performance on seven common psychoacoustical tasks was only weakly correlated with individual AEP measures (just as was true for the OAEs also measured on these subjects). AMLR Wave Pa unexpectedly did not show the decrease in latency and increase in amplitude typically observed for AEPs when click level was varied from 40 to 70 dB nHL (normal Hearing Level). For the majority of the measures, the variability of the distribution of scores was greater for the males than for the females.


2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (07) ◽  
pp. 367-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne C. Purdy ◽  
Andrea S. Kelly ◽  
Merren G. Davies

Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) and behavioral tests were used to evaluate auditory processing in 10 children aged 7 to 11 years who were diagnosed as learning disabled (LD). AEPs included auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), middle latency responses (MLRs), and late cortical responses (P1, N1, P2, P3). Late cortical responses were recorded using an active listening oddball procedure. Auditory processing disorders were suspected in the LD children after a psychologist found phonologic processing and auditory memory problems. A control group of 10 age- and gender-matched children with no hearing or reported learning difficulties was also tested. Teacher ratings of classroom listening and SCAN Competing Words and Staggered Spondaic Word scores were poorer in the LD children. There were minor ABR latency differences between the two groups. Wave Na of the MLR was later and Nb was smaller in the LD group. The main differences in cortical responses were that P1 was earlier and P3 was later and smaller in the LD group.


2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica N. Hernandez ◽  
Stan Kuczaj ◽  
Dorian S. Houser ◽  
James J. Finneran

2019 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 2746-2746
Author(s):  
James J. Finneran ◽  
Ryan A. Jones ◽  
Jason Mulsow ◽  
Robert F. Burkard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document