Impact of liberal use of mediolateral episiotomy on the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter tear

2012 ◽  
Vol 286 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah Zafran ◽  
Raed Salim
Midwifery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Drusany Staric ◽  
Adolf Lukanovic ◽  
Petra Petrocnik ◽  
Vita Zacesta ◽  
Corrado Cescon ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary P. FitzGerald ◽  
Anne M. Weber ◽  
Nancy Howden ◽  
Geoffrey W. Cundiff ◽  
Mort B. Brown

Author(s):  
Søren Laurberg ◽  
Karl Møller Bek

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Gachon ◽  
◽  
Thomas Schmitz ◽  
France Artzner ◽  
Olivier Parant ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We aimed at developing a core outcome and variables of interest set to investigate the effects of mediolateral episiotomy on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) during and after operative delivery in nulliparous women in a large-scale one-year observational French study including 15,000 women (INSTRUMODA). Methods A list of outcomes and variables of interest was suggested to obstetricians participating in the INSTRUMODA study using online questionnaires divided into 7 categories: the woman’s history and course of pregnancy, course of labor, modalities of operative delivery, episiotomy characteristics, immediate maternal morbidity, one-year maternal morbidity, immediate neonatal morbidity. We used a three-round DELPHI method to reach a consensus. In the first round, outcomes and variables considered as essential by 70% or more of obstetricians were included in the corpus whereas they were excluded when 70% rated them as “not important”. In the second round, non-consensual outcomes and variables were reassessed and excluded or definitively included if considered as “not important” or essential by 50% or more of the obstetricians. During the first round, obstetricians were invited to suggest new outcomes and/or variables that were then assessed in the second and third round. We used the same method to develop a core outcome and variables of interest set in a population of women in the community recruited via an association of patients. At the end of the procedure the core outcome and variables of interest sets were merged to provide the final core outcome set for the INSTRUMODA study. Results Fifty-three obstetricians and 16 women filled out questionnaires. After the 3 rounds of Delphi procedure in each population, 74 outcomes and variables were consensually reported by obstetricians and 92 by women in the community. By mixing these two consensual corpora we reported a final consensual list of 114 variables of interest and outcomes for both obstetricians and women. Conclusion We established a core outcome and variables of interest set among obstetricians and women in the community to investigate the association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASI during operative delivery. Trial registration The INSTRUMODA study was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov on June 25, 2020 (NCT04446780).


2020 ◽  
Vol 301 (6) ◽  
pp. 1479-1484
Author(s):  
J. Pirhonen ◽  
K. Haadem ◽  
M. Gissler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document