In vitro evaluation of the effect of post system and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated human anterior teeth

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1627-1633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Jindal ◽  
Ritu Jindal ◽  
Sandeep Mahajan ◽  
Rohini Dua ◽  
Namita Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Anterior Teeth

scholarly journals AN INVITRO COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH OBTURATED WITH RESILON AND GUTTA-PERCHA

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 075-079
Author(s):  
Kiran Halkai ◽  
Rahul Halkai ◽  
Mithra N. Hegde ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Aim: To compare and evaluate in-vitro the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with resilon & epiphany sealer and guttapercha using different sealers. Epoxy resin based sealer AH-plus and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer-TubliSeal (EWT). Methodology: sixty four human single rooted maxillary anterior teeth, cleaned stored in 0.9% saline. All the teeth were decoronated to root length 14mm and bucco-lingual diameter of 5-7mm, After access openings teeth were instrumented using K3.06 up to final apical size 30/.06 and randomly allocated into 4 experimental groups (n=16 per group). Group 1(Control group): teeth were instrumented but not obturated, Group 2: Resilon cones and epiphany SE-sealer. Group 3: guttapercha cones and epoxy based sealer AH plus. Group 4: guttapercha and Tubli seal EWT. Coronal seal was done using IRM cement. Each of the specimens were tested for fracture resistance by instron universal testing machine. Results: Higher fracture resistance values were observed for group 2 (Resilon & Epiphany SE sealer) followed by group 3(Guttapercha & AH Plus sealer) and group 4(Guttapercha & TubliSeal EWT) when compared to group1 (control-instrumented but not obturated). Conclusion: filling the root canals with contemporary polymer based root canal obturating system- Resilon increased the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.

scholarly journals An in vitro evaluation of fracture resistance strength of different post systems in endodontically treated teeth

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabna Moyin ◽  
Saurabh Chaturvedi ◽  
NasserM Alqahtani ◽  
Mansoor Shariff ◽  
AdelM Abdelmonem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation

scholarly journals Fracture Resistance of a Bulk-Fill and a Conventional Composite and a Combination of Both for Coronal Restoration of Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Mosharrafian ◽  
Maryam Shafizadeh ◽  
Zeinab Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
One Way Anova

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of a bulk-fill and a conventional composite and a combination of both for coronal restoration of severely damaged primary anterior teeth. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 45 primary anterior teeth were randomly divided into three groups. After root canal preparation, the canals were filled with Metapex paste such that after the application of 1 mm of light-cure liner, 3 mm of the coronal third of the canal remained empty for composite post fabrication. Filtek Z250 conventional composite was used in group 1, Sonic-Fill bulk-fill composite was used in group 2 and Sonic-Fill with one layer of Filtek Z250 as the veneering were used in group 3. Adper Single Bond 2 was used in all groups. The teeth were thermocycled, and fracture resistance was measured by a universal testing machine. The mode of fracture was categorized as repairable or irreparable. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results: The mean fracture resistance was 307.00±74.72, 323.31±84.28 and 333.30±63.96 N in groups 1 to 3, respectively (P=0.55). The mean fracture strength was 14.53±2.98, 15.08±2.82 and 15.26±3.02 MPa in groups 1 to 3, respectively (P=0.77). The frequency of repairable mode of failure was 80% for the conventional, 73.6% for the bulk-fill and 80% for the bulk-fill plus conventional group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions: Bulk-fill composites can be used for coronal reconstruction of severely damaged primary anterior teeth similar to conventional composites to decrease the treatment time in pediatric patients.

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Teeth Restored Using Three Root-reinforcement Methods

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soodabeh Kimyai ◽  
Horieh Moosavi ◽  
Fathemeh Maleknejad
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Root Reinforcement ◽  
Anterior Teeth

Abstract Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated anterior teeth with their roots reinforced using three different restorative methods. Methods and Materials Forty sound maxillary human central incisors were randomly assigned to four groups (n=10). The crowns of the teeth were removed at a level 2 mm incisal to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). After root canal therapy, flared canals were simulated in three groups. In the first, second, and third groups the flared canals were reinforced with resin composite (RCO) (Clearfil DC Core Automix), two Reforpins (REF), and a resin cement (RCE) (Panavia F 2.0), respectively. In the fourth (DEN) group flared canals were not created. The same size fiber reinforced composite (FRC) posts were cemented with resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) in all groups. After post cementation and restoration of the teeth crown with a core build-up composite (Clearfil Photo Core), the roots of the teeth were embedded in acrylic resin blocks up to 1 mm below the CEJ. The samples were loaded in an Instron testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min at a 45° angle to the long axis of the tooth on the palatal surfaces until failure occurred. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results Significant differences were found between fracture resistance in all of the groups (P<0.05) with the exception being among the RCO and REF groups. The least mean value 230 (130) N and the highest mean value 830 (220) N were shown in the fracture resistance of the RCE and DEN groups, respectively. Conclusion Reforpin can be used as an alternative to resin composite for internal reinforcement of weakened roots according to the results of this study. For reinforcement of flared canals, fiber posts along with Reforpin or resin composite proved to have higher fracture resistance than resin cement. Non flared canals had the highest fracture resistance. Citation Moosavi H, Maleknejad F, Kimyai S. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Teeth Restored Using Three Root-reinforcement Methods. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 January; (9)1:030-037.

Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth with cervical cavities: An in vitro study

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abduljawad ◽  
Abdulaziz Samran ◽  
Jadalkareem Kadour ◽  
Mahmoud Al-Afandi ◽  
Mohamad Ghazal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Fiber Posts
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document