Multi-institutional Experience with Patient Image Access Through Electronic Health Record Patient Portals

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailey H. Choi ◽  
Amy L. Kotsenas ◽  
Joshua Vic Chen ◽  
Christina Bronsky ◽  
Christopher J. Roth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Image Access ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Improving Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension With NoteAid: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Crowdsourced Workers (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P Lalor ◽  
Beverly Woolf ◽  
Hong Yu
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Amazon Mechanical Turk ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Baseline Group ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Medical Concepts

BACKGROUND Patient portals are becoming more common, and with them, the ability of patients to access their personal electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs, in particular the free-text EHR notes, often contain medical jargon and terms that are difficult for laypersons to understand. There are many Web-based resources for learning more about particular diseases or conditions, including systems that directly link to lay definitions or educational materials for medical concepts. OBJECTIVE Our goal is to determine whether use of one such tool, NoteAid, leads to higher EHR note comprehension ability. We use a new EHR note comprehension assessment tool instead of patient self-reported scores. METHODS In this work, we compare a passive, self-service educational resource (MedlinePlus) with an active resource (NoteAid) where definitions are provided to the user for medical concepts that the system identifies. We use Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) to recruit individuals to complete ComprehENotes, a new test of EHR note comprehension. RESULTS Mean scores for individuals with access to NoteAid are significantly higher than the mean baseline scores, both for raw scores (P=.008) and estimated ability (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS In our experiments, we show that the active intervention leads to significantly higher scores on the comprehension test as compared with a baseline group with no resources provided. In contrast, there is no significant difference between the group that was provided with the passive intervention and the baseline group. Finally, we analyze the demographics of the individuals who participated in our AMT task and show differences between groups that align with the current understanding of health literacy between populations. This is the first work to show improvements in comprehension using tools such as NoteAid as measured by an EHR note comprehension assessment tool as opposed to patient self-reported scores.

Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care

2018 ◽  
pp. 122-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan Basch ◽  
Lisa Barbera ◽  
Carolyn L. Kerrigan ◽  
Galina Velikova
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Free Standing ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Electronic Health

There is increasing interest to integrate collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in routine practice to enhance clinical care. Multiple studies show that systematic monitoring of patients using PROs improves patient-clinician communication, clinician awareness of symptoms, symptom management, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and overall survival. The general approach includes a brief electronic survey, administered via the Web or an app or an automated telephone system, with alerts to clinicians for concerning or worsening issues. Patients have generally been asked to self-report on a regular basis (remotely between visits and/or at visits), with reminders prompting patients to self-report that are sent via email, text, or automated phone message. More recently, care management pathways for patients and clinicians have been triggered by PRO system alerts. PRO systems may be free-standing, integrated into electronic health record systems or patient portals, or native functionality of an electronic health record. Despite potential benefits, there are challenges with integrating PROs into practice for monitoring patient status, as there are with any modifications to existing clinical processes. These challenges range from administrative to technical to workflow. A session at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting was dedicated to the implementation of PROs in clinical practice. The session focused on practical examples of PRO implementations, with honest reflections on barriers and strategies that may be generalizable to other systems looking to implement PROs. Panelists for that session are the authors of this paper, which describes their respective experiences implementing PROs in practice settings.

scholarly journals Improving infant sleep safety via electronic health record communication: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan A. Canty ◽  
Benjamin N. Fogel ◽  
Erich K. Batra ◽  
Eric W. Schaefer ◽  
Jessica S. Beiler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Infant Sleep ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Safe Sleep ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Sleep Safety

Abstract Background With increased use of telehealth, interventions to improve infant sleep environments have not been explored. This study sought to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using electronic health record patient portals to transmit photographs of infant sleep between mothers and healthcare professionals as part of an intervention to promote sleep environments consistent with AAP guidelines. Methods One hundred eighty-four mother-newborn dyads consented to participate in a randomized trial requiring patient portal registration within 1 month of delivery. We first assessed feasibility as measured by a) the proportion of consented mothers enrolling in the portal and b) maternal adherence to prompts to submit photographs of their infant sleeping to the research team through the patient portal. Intervention group mothers were prompted at 1 and 2 months; controls were prompted only at 2 months. Efficacy was determined via research assistant review of submitted photographs. These assistants were trained to detect sudden unexplained infant death risk factors utilizing AAP guidelines. Standardized feedback was returned to mothers through the patient portal. We used Fisher’s Exact test to assess group differences in guideline adherence at 2 months. Results One hundred nine mothers (59%) enrolled in the patient portal and were randomized to intervention (N = 55) and control (N = 54) groups. 21 (38, 95% CI 25–52%) intervention group participants sent photographs at 1 month and received personalized feedback. Across both groups at 2 months, 40 (37, 95% CI 28–46%) sent photographs; 56% of intervention group participants who submitted photographs met all safe sleep criteria compared with 46% of controls (difference 0.10, 95% CI − 0.26 to 0.46, p = .75). Common reasons for guideline non-adherence were sleeping in a room without a caregiver (43%), loose bedding (15%) and objects (8%) on the sleep surface. Conclusions Utilizing the patient portal to individualize safe infant sleep is possible, however, we encountered numerous barriers in this trial to assess its effects on promoting safe infant sleep. Photographs of infants sleeping showed substantial non-adherence to AAP guidelines, suggesting further needs for improvement to promote safe infant sleep practices. Trial registration Name: Improving Infant Sleep Safety With the Electronic Health Record; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03662048; Date of Registration: September 7, 2018; Data Sharing Statement: None

scholarly journals Analysis of Employee Patient Portal Use and Electronic Health Record Access at an Academic Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 433-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Sulieman ◽  
Bryan Steitz ◽  
S. Trent Rosenbloom
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Usage Patterns ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Background Patient portals provide patients and their caregivers online access to limited health results. Health care employees with electronic health record (EHR) access may be able to view their health information not available in the patient portal by looking in the EHR. Objective In this study, we examine how employees use the patient portal when they also have access to the tethered EHR. Methods We obtained patient portal and EHR usage logs corresponding to all employees who viewed their health data at our institution between January 1, 2013 and November 1, 2017. We formed three cohorts based on the systems that employees used to view their health data: employees who used the patient portal only, employees who viewed health data in the EHR only, and employees who used both systems. We compared system accesses and usage patterns for each employee cohort. Results During the study period, 35,172 employees accessed the EHR as part of patients' treatment and 28,631 employees accessed their health data: 25,193 of them used the patient portal and 13,318 accessed their clinical data in EHR. All employees who accessed their records in the EHR viewed their clinical notes at least once. Among EHR accesses, clinical note accesses comprised more than 42% of all EHR accesses. Provider messaging and appointment scheduling were the most commonly used functions in the patient portal. Employees who had access to their health data in both systems were more likely to engage with providers through portal messages. Conclusion Employees at a large medical center accessed clinical notes in the EHR to obtain information about their health. Employees also viewed other health data not readily available in the patient portal.

scholarly journals Pattern of Use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) among the Chronically Ill: A Health Information National Trend Survey (HINTS) Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 7254
Author(s):  
Rose Calixte ◽  
Sumaiya Islam ◽  
Zainab Toteh Osakwe ◽  
Argelis Rivera ◽  
Marlene Camacho-Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Provider Communication ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Electronic Health

Effective patient–provider communication is a cornerstone of patient-centered care. Patient portals provide an effective method for secure communication between patients or their proxies and their health care providers. With greater acceptability of patient portals in private practices, patients have a unique opportunity to manage their health care needs. However, studies have shown that less than 50% of patients reported accessing the electronic health record (EHR) in a 12-month period. We used HINTS 5 cycle 1 and cycle 2 to assess disparities among US residents 18 and older with any chronic condition regarding the use of EHR for secure direct messaging with providers, to request refills, to make clinical decisions, or to share medical records with another provider. The results indicate that respondents with multimorbidity are more likely to share their medical records with other providers. However, respondents who are 75 and older are less likely to share their medical records with another provider. Additionally, respondents who are 65 and older are less likely to use the EHR for secure direct messaging with their provider. Additional health care strategies and provider communication should be developed to encourage older patients with chronic conditions to leverage the use of patient portals for effective disease management.

Business: The Electronic Health Record: Front Line Experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Rosemary Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Health Trends ◽  
Electronic Health

National legislation is in place to facilitate reform of the United States health care industry. The Health Care Information Technology and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) offers financial incentives to hospitals, physicians, and individual providers to establish an electronic health record that ultimately will link with the health information technology of other health care systems and providers. The information collected will facilitate patient safety, promote best practice, and track health trends such as smoking and childhood obesity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document