This paper provides a detailed review of the major vegetation classification
and mapping systems used by the management agencies with primary
responsibilities for forested land in Australia. It focuses on the
clarification of vegetation units and methodologies used. The paper also
provides a comparison of the different nomenclatures against a simplified
standard to show how the different systems relate to each other. In Australia,
different systems for classifying and describing forest vegetation have been
developed by various forest land management agencies to suit their own
situations. Most vegetation classification systems reviewed are similar in
using floristics and structure as the two primary elements in classifying
vegetation types, and all use growth form (physiognomy) to distinguish
vegetation units. The classification and mapping systems for wood production
purposes differ from those for conservation and environment purposes in
several aspects—wood production classifications emphasise commercial
tree species and/or attributes such as height, whereas conservation
classifications emphasise ecology, vegetation coverage, and the importance of
understorey species. There are three broad strategic approaches in the
vegetation classification programs being undertaken by the major forest land
management agencies in Australia: (1) conducting a single classification
across the whole of the agencies’ land in a State; (2) conducting a
vegetation classification at the regional level, but using the same methods in
each region; and (3) using different methods depending on the specific
objectives of individual studies. This paper highlights the value of accurate
quantitative measurements in the field. For example, for the two key
structural attributes of height and crown density, the measured raw data can
be accommodated by a number of different classification schemes whereas if the
raw data consists of only records by predetermined classes, then such
accommodation is difficult and loses precision.