Climate change, aerobiology, and public health in the Northeast United States

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 607-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis H. Ziska ◽  
Paul R. Epstein ◽  
Christine A. Rogers
2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (20) ◽  
pp. 10,569-10,592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangxing Fan ◽  
Raymond S. Bradley ◽  
Michael A. Rawlins

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 11699
Author(s):  
Abigail Abrash Walton ◽  
Janine Marr ◽  
Matthew J. Cahillane ◽  
Kathleen Bush

Climate change-related natural disasters, including wildfires and extreme weather events, such as intense storms, floods, and heatwaves, are increasing in frequency and intensity. These events are already profoundly affecting human health in the United States and globally, challenging the ability of communities to prepare, respond, and recover. The purpose of this research was to examine the peer-reviewed literature on community resilience initiatives in one of the most densely populated and economically important regions, the Northeastern United States, and to identify evidence-based interventions and metrics that had been field-tested and evaluated. This paper addresses two critical gaps in the literature: (1) what strategies or interventions have been implemented to build or enhance community resilience against climate change-related natural disasters; and (2) what metrics were used to measure community resilience as an outcome of those strategies or interventions? This review provides a succinct list of effective interventions with specific health outcomes. Community or state-level health officials can use the results to prioritize public health interventions. This review used existing database search tools to discover 205 studies related to community resilience and health outcomes. Methods set criteria to assess if interventions were able to measure and change levels of community resilience to the health impacts associated with a changing climate. Criteria included: (a) alignment with the United States’ National Preparedness Goal for reducing risks to human health and for recovering quickly from disasters; (b) derived from publicly available data sources; (c) developed for use by communities at a local scale; and (d) accessible to modestly resourced municipalities and county health agencies. Five (5) peer-reviewed, evidence-based studies met all of the selection criteria. Three of these articles described intervention frameworks and two reported on the use of standardized tools. Health-related outcomes included mental health impacts (PTSD/depression), mental stress, emergency preparedness knowledge, social capital skills, and emergency planning skills. The paper recommends the COAST project, COPEWELL Rubric for self-assessment, and Ready CDC intervention as examples of strategies that could be adapted by any community engaged in building community resilience.


2017 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Smith ◽  
Shannon E. Cunniff ◽  
Natalie S. Peyronnin ◽  
Jacob P. Kritzer

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Obste Therasme ◽  
Timothy A. Volk ◽  
Mark H. Eisenbies ◽  
Thomas E. Amidon ◽  
Marie-Odile Fortier

Abstract Background The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been on the rise for more than a century. Bioenergy crops are seen by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as an essential part of the solution to addressing climate change. To understand the potential impact of shrub willow (Salix spp.) crop in the northeast United States, effective and transparent life cycle assessment of these systems needs to occur. Results Here we show, ethanol produced from the fermentation of sugars from hot water extract of willow grown on cropland can sequester 0.012 ± 0.003 kg CO2eq MJ−1 for a supply system incorporating summer harvest and storage. Despite decreases in soil organic carbon when willow is instead grown on grassland, the produced fuel still can provide significant climate benefits compared to gasoline. Conclusions Shrub willow converted to ethanol can be a carbon negative source of transportation fuel when the electricity and heat required for the conversion process are generated from renewable biomass. The sequestration of carbon in the belowground portion of the plants is essential for the negative GHG balance for cropland and low GHG emissions in grassland.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document