In defence of a faith-like model of love: a reply to John Lippitt’s “Kierkegaard and the problem of special relationships: Ferreira, Krishek, and the ‘God filter”’

2013 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Krishek
Keyword(s):  
Special Relationships

Scholar2vec: Vector Representation of Scholars for Lifetime Collaborator Prediction

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Feng Xia ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Zhiguo Gong ◽  
Hanghang Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Collaboration ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Collaboration Network ◽  
Vector Representation ◽  
Network Embedding ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Academic Networks ◽  
Special Relationships ◽  
Real World Datasets ◽  
Vector Representations

While scientific collaboration is critical for a scholar, some collaborators can be more significant than others, e.g., lifetime collaborators. It has been shown that lifetime collaborators are more influential on a scholar’s academic performance. However, little research has been done on investigating predicting such special relationships in academic networks. To this end, we propose Scholar2vec, a novel neural network embedding for representing scholar profiles. First, our approach creates scholars’ research interest vector from textual information, such as demographics, research, and influence. After bridging research interests with a collaboration network, vector representations of scholars can be gained with graph learning. Meanwhile, since scholars are occupied with various attributes, we propose to incorporate four types of scholar attributes for learning scholar vectors. Finally, the early-stage similarity sequence based on Scholar2vec is used to predict lifetime collaborators with machine learning methods. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets show that Scholar2vec outperforms state-of-the-art methods in lifetime collaborator prediction. Our work presents a new way to measure the similarity between two scholars by vector representation, which tackles the knowledge between network embedding and academic relationship mining.

„Ich werde dich immer Mr. Knightley nennen“

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-277
Author(s):  
Sandra Hubmann
Keyword(s):  
German Literature ◽  
Romantic Love ◽  
English Novel ◽  
Close Friendships ◽  
Special Relationships ◽  
Parallel Texts

AbstractTranslating you into German means deciding between different pronouns of address, a choice that can express either hierarchy, formality or intimacy between speaker and listener. This paper analyses to what extent the pronominal address is used to characterise fictional relationships in the eight German translations of Jane Austen’s novel Emma by comparing them with original German literature written around 1815, the year when the English novel was first published. While the selected parallel texts highlight special relationships like close friendships or romantic love with the pronominal address, the paper shows that this is less frequently the case in the translations.

Happy Families and Special Relationships

2019 ◽  
pp. 197-232
Author(s):  
Jonathan Charteris-Black
Keyword(s):  
Special Relationships

Your Value

Partiality ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Keller
Keyword(s):  
Special Treatment ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Special Relationships

This chapter gives an argument for the individuals view. The individuals view says that norms of partiality arise from facts about the individuals with whom our special relationships are shared. Your reasons to give special treatment to your friend, according to the individuals view, are explained by something about your friend: something that would be there even if she did not take a special place in your projects, and even if the two of you did not share a friendship. To find the source of our reasons of partiality, says the individuals view, we need to look more closely not at ourselves or our relationships but at the particular other people with whom our special relationships are shared.

Special Relationships in Foreign Policy

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Harnisch
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
World War Ii ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Social Constructivism ◽  
Humanitarian Law ◽  
Foreign Policy Analysis ◽  
Relational Term ◽  
Special Relations ◽  
Special Relationships

Special relationships are durable and exclusive bilateral relations between autonomous polities that are based on mutual expectations of preferential treatment by its members and outsiders as well as regular entanglement of some (external) governance functions. The concept has become more prominent over the past three decades in part because of recent changes in international relations and foreign policy analysis theory (the constructivist and relational turn) and long-term shifts in the social structure of international relations, that is, decolonization, international criminal and humanitarian law, which have posed questions of solidarity, reconciliation, and responsibility of current and past special relationships. The term special relationship has a long and diverse history. After World War II, it was used mainly to depict the Anglo-American security relationship as special. Today, well over 50 international relationships are deemed special. Despite this trend, no common theoretical framework has been developed to explain their emergence, variation, persistence and demise. Realism interprets special relationships as asymmetrical power relations, in which presupposed counterbalancing behavior does not occur because shared ideas or institutions mitigate autonomy concerns. Liberalism postulates that the special relatedness occurs when policy interdependence due to shared commercial interests or ideas allows deep cooperation and trust building. Social constructivism, in turn, assumes self-assertion but does not presuppose with or against whom the self, usually a polity, identifies itself. It follows that special relations may occur between dyads with positive identification (Germany-Israel after reconciliation) or negative identification, such as in the enduring rivalry between India and Pakistan. As a relational term, special relationships do not sit easily with the first generation of foreign policy analysis focusing on decision making processes rather than the policies themselves. As a consequence, special relationships have been primarily conceptualized either as a tool of foreign policy or as one context factor influencing foreign policy choices. In relational theories, such as social constructivism, special relations, such as solidarity relations, are not causally independent from actors, as these relations also define the actors themselves.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document