Is Action Design Research Indeed Necessary? Analysis and Synergies Between Action Research and Design Science Research

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalila Cisco Collatto ◽  
Aline Dresch ◽  
Daniel Pacheco Lacerda ◽  
Ione Ghislene Bentz
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Action Design Research ◽  
Research And Design

scholarly journals Towards Participatory Action Design Research: Adapting Action Research and Design Science Research Methods for Urban Informatics

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bilandzic ◽  
John Venable
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Urban Environments ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Action Design Research ◽  
Urban Informatics ◽  
Research And Design

This paper proposes a new research method, Participatory Action Design Research (PADR), for studies in the Urban Informatics (UI) domain. PADR supports UI research in developing new technological means (e.g. using mobile and ubiquitous computing) to resolve contemporary issues or support everyday life in urban environments. Situated in a socio-technical context, UI requires a close dialogue between social and design-oriented fields of research as well as their methods. PADR combines Action Research and Design Science Research, both of which are used in Information Systems, another field with a strong socio-technical emphasis, and further adapts them to the cross-disciplinary needs and research context of UI.

scholarly journals A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research

2015 ◽  
pp. 1116-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Dresch ◽  
Daniel Pacheco Lacerda ◽  
Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Research And Design

scholarly journals A design science nas pesquisas em design no Brasil

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iana Uliana Perez ◽  
Mônica Moura ◽  
Fausto Orsi Medola
Keyword(s):  
Design Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Action Design Research

Este artigo apresenta a abordagem da design science como alternativa para as investigações em design e nas ciências sociais aplicadas em geral. Para a sua redação, foi empreendida Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática no Catálogo de Teses e Dissertações da Capes, verificando-se a incidência dos termos “design science” e “action design research”. O levantamento permitiu a identificação de 14 teses e dissertações em design que adotaram métodos próprios da design science, como Design Science Research (DSR) e Action Design Research (ADR). Para caracterizar esses métodos, é apresentada análise comparativa das pesquisas de três teses que adotaram a DSR; também é relatada a experiência de realização de uma pesquisa de mestrado que utilizou a ADR. A discussão ressalta as contribuições desses métodos e os aspectos que precisam ser aprimorados para sua operacionalização.

Motivating an action design research approach to implementing online training in an organisational context

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Rogerson ◽  
Elsje Scott
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Action Design Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
Research And Design ◽  
Real World Situation

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the effectiveness of action design research (ADR), a combination of action research and design science research, when conducting research where both practical relevance and academic rigor are required. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents ADR in action in order to motivate its use when investigating real-world organisational concerns requiring practical solutions, whilst also fulfilling academic requirements. Findings – When research methodology aligns to research objectives, the resulting synchronicity can elevate the outcome considerably. From this study, which attempts to address concerns of informing practice, as well as advancing theory, ADR appears to be an extremely effective research tool. Research limitations/implications – The study is limited to a single organisation and it would not be possible to make statistical generalisations. It is hoped, however, that the findings can be generalised to a theory that can be used in a similar setting. It would be valuable to discover whether other studies using ADR also find such effective alignment between relevance and rigour. Practical implications – The research involves an intervention in the finance course offerings for staff training in the workplace. The detailed description of each of the seven ADR stages could prove useful for other researchers contemplating using ADR. The paper offers an example of ADR in practice. Originality/value – This paper outlines the suitability and advantages of adopting an ADR approach, where the goal is to meet the challenge of implementing a solution in a real-world situation, whilst also adding to academic theory and knowledge.

scholarly journals Practical Implications On How Established Companies Innovate With Startups

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Andrea Back ◽  
Tina M Werro ◽  
Lukas M Peter
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Decision Matrix ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Research And Design ◽  
Practical Implications

The study addresses an important literature gap concerning open innovation and startups. The purpose of this article is to deliver tools and guidelines for innovation managers to support their decision-making when aspiring to openly innovate with startups. The study proposes five spectra that show the variance across different collaboration on the following parameters for analysis: 1) investment required; 2) risk level; 3) corporate control; 4) Startup support; 5) ecosystem leverage. The article arrives at a simple weighted decision matrix to be used as a decision-guiding tool in determining the best choice of a startup-collaboration option from a corporate perspective. The research builds on a framework of references to previous literature and follows an explorative approach based on field research and design science research.

Design science research with focus groups – a pragmatic meta-model

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Telmo Antonio Henriques ◽  
Henrique O’Neill
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Success Factor ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Meta Model ◽  
Is Implementation ◽  
Practical Guidelines

PurposeThe purpose of this research paper is to present a pragmatic and systematic approach to conduct and document Design Science Research (DSR) activities with Focus Groups (FGs), exploring its continuous usage and providing traceability between problem, requirements, solutions and artefacts.Design/methodology/approachThe approach is to conduct the research and produce the meta-model for DSR with FG, a DSR approach was adopted using a conceptual model for Action Design Research already available. The artefact is the result from a specific literature review to define requirements, a careful design and a refinement stage where it was widely used and tested in real IS implementation projects.FindingsRigorous and committed stakeholder engagement is a critical success factor in complex projects. The main outcome of this research is a specific meta-model for DSR with FG that delivers new insights and practical guidelines for academics and professionals conducting and documenting real-world research and development initiatives deep-rooted in stakeholders' participation.Research limitations/implicationsThe meta-model has been endorsed as a practical and useful artefact by the stakeholders participating in the IS projects where it was adopted. However, to fully demonstrate its capabilities and to become more robust, the model has to be further used and tested in other application situations and environments.Originality/valueThe usage of FGs in DSR has already been proposed as an effective way, either to study artefacts, to propose improvements in its design or to acknowledge the utility of those artefacts in field use. The paper provides a sound contribution to this line of research by presenting a meta-model that integrates process and data, as well as a set of practical templates and forms that may be used by researchers and practitioners to conduct their projects.

scholarly journals Design Science Research: Evaluation in the Lens of Big Data Analytics

Systems ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elragal ◽  
Moutaz Haddara
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Data Analytics ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Big Data Analytics ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Evaluation Phase ◽  
New Type

Given the different types of artifacts and their various evaluation methods, one of the main challenges faced by researchers in design science research (DSR) is choosing suitable and efficient methods during the artifact evaluation phase. With the emergence of big data analytics, data scientists conducting DSR are also challenged with identifying suitable evaluation mechanisms for their data products. Hence, this conceptual research paper is set out to address the following questions. Does big data analytics impact how evaluation in DSR is conducted? If so, does it lead to a new type of evaluation or a new genre of DSR? We conclude by arguing that big data analytics should influence how evaluation is conducted, but it does not lead to the creation of a new genre of design research.

scholarly journals EXPLORANDO O USO DO MODELO TARGET: A GESTÃO DE LIÇÕES APRENDIDAS NA ÁREA DE PROJETOS EM UMA INSTITUIÇÃO GOVERNAMENTAL DE SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Jose Benedito Damasceno Jr. ◽  
Marcirio Silveira Chaves
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research

Cada vez mais o tema lições aprendidas em projetos vem se fazendo presente, haja vista a sua abordagem nas instituições e a crescente produção de pesquisas acadêmicas. Modelos para Gestão de Lições Aprendidas (GLA) vêm sendo desenvolvidos, apoiados em processos e ferramentas como os softwares sociais (e.g. Wikis, Blogues e Microblogues). Considerando o problema do desuso ou do desconhecimento de processos e ferramentas para GLA nas instituições, esta pesquisa empírica tem como objetivo validar um modelo de GLA em uma instituição governamental de segurança pública. O modelo foi instanciado em uma plataforma Wiki. Este trabalho usa o paradigma de pesquisa Design Science Research (DSR) e o método de pesquisa Technical Action Research (TAR). Os resultados sugerem incrementos ao modelo instanciado na relação processos de lições aprendidas por fase do ciclo de vida do projeto, enquanto a utilidade e a facilidade no uso da Wiki foram reconhecidas pelos envolvidos que, também, consideram haver efeito positivo na eficiência e na eficácia nos processos e nas atividades do projeto. A contribuição para a teoria ocorre à medida que se confirma que investir na adoção de técnicas e ferramentas em projetos é fundamental e que é possível inovar na segurança pública brasileira por meio das boas práticas de projetos. Já a contribuição para a prática se apresenta na adoção de uma sistemática para GLA em projetos inéditos naquela instituição.

scholarly journals Do Design Science Research and Design Thinking Processes Improve the ‘Fit’ of the Fit-For-Purpose Approach to Securing Land Tenure for All in South Africa?

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 484
Author(s):  
Simon Hull ◽  
Jennifer Whittal
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Design Thinking ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Design Science Research ◽  
Land Administration ◽  
Fit For Purpose ◽  
Land Administration Systems ◽  
Research And Design

In South Africa, land tenure security is a challenge for 60% or more of the population who hold interests in land outside of the formal system of registered title. There is a need for the cadastral and land administration systems to be reshaped, and for new land tenure forms to be developed to record all land rights and interests so as to improve land tenure security for all. In this paper, we undertake a reflective retrospective of the processes of land administrative reform in South Africa using a thematic framework that includes fit-for-purpose, design science research, and design thinking processes. Literary sources are coded using the thematic framework to identify potential contributions of foregrounding design science research and design thinking in fit-for-purpose land administration (FFP LA) approaches. Design science research paired with tools of behavioral science add value in understanding the context, problems, needs, and objectives and in communicating the results of critical reflection. The design thinking process has much to offer in capitalizing on the human abilities of empathy, deep understanding, and challenging assumptions, setting the scene for unconstrained creative thinking. Design science research and design thinking within FFP LA may promote innovations in land administration systems reform initiatives that deliver restorative justice in the South African land sector.

scholarly journals Researching navigation of project complexity using action design research

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mogens Frank Mikkelsen ◽  
John Venable ◽  
Kirsi Aaltonen
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Formative Evaluation ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Action Design Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Project Complexity

PurposeProject complexity is becoming increasingly challenging for project managers. Much valuable research has been done on the concept of project complexity. The research reported in this paper aims to provide a new means (the “Complexity Navigation Window”) and guiding principles for the navigation of project complexity in practice.Design/methodology/approachThis paper applied action design research (a methodology for design science research) to design and evaluate the Complexity Navigation Window (CNW), which will serve as a representation of project complexity as a key component of the user interface for a decision support system (DSS) for managing project complexity.FindingsFormative evaluations of the CNW by 16 project management practitioners indicated that the artefact is relevant, comprehensible and heading in a promising direction to guide decision-making. The evaluation also highlighted project managers' difficulty in using the (conceptual) representation by itself to assess a project's current situation accurately, which in turn limits their ability to understand a project's current complexity and decide an appropriate course of strategy. A conceptual framework by itself is insufficient. This finding motivates further research to develop and evaluate a DSS that would partially automate the assessment process (by surveying stakeholders and automatically assessing and representing project complexity according to the CNW), which should aid in increasing the accuracy (and timeliness) of project complexity assessments and contribute to appropriate strategy formulation and timely revision.Practical implicationsThe formative evaluation of the CNW indicates relevance for practitioners and the further features of the DSS may still yield even higher perceived utility from the full artefact.Originality/valueThe paper provides improved understanding of practitioners' perceptions of project complexity and ability to assess it for a given project. The paper describes the design of a new visualisation for navigating and managing complexity. The paper further presents four strategies for managing project complexity. Finally, the paper also provides a methodological discussion on the potential of ADR in advancing project management research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document