scholarly journals Vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): risk and long-term results

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz ◽  
Ilona Michałowska ◽  
Adam Witkowski ◽  
Maciej Dąbrowski ◽  
Ewa Księżycka-Majczyńska ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. B221
Author(s):  
Pablo Codner ◽  
Abid Assali ◽  
Hana Vaknin-Assa ◽  
Yaron Shapira ◽  
Gabriel Greenberg ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 169 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio J. Muñoz-García ◽  
Raquel del Valle ◽  
Ramiro Trillo-Nouche ◽  
Jaime Elízaga ◽  
Federico Gimeno ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. S49-S50
Author(s):  
Pablo Codner ◽  
Abid Assali ◽  
Hana Vaknin-Assa ◽  
Gabriel Greenberg ◽  
Katia Orvin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Andrea Pacchioni ◽  
Dimitris Nikas ◽  
Carlo Penzo ◽  
Salvatore Saccà ◽  
Luca Favero ◽  
...  

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) are increasingly being used as therapeutic options for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are ineligible for surgery and who have aortic aneurysm with suitable anatomical features. These procedures can be associated with severe complications, especially related to vascular access and the use of a large introducer sheath (from 18 to 24 French [Fr]). In this article we describe possible vascular complications emerging during TAVI and EVAR and their appropriate management, beginning with patient selection, the correct way to perform vessel puncture and the use of a vascular closure device, up to the recently proposed cross-over technique, which is thought to minimise the risk of dangerous consequences of vascular damage.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasiliki Gardikioti ◽  
Dimitrios Terentes-printzios ◽  
Konstantinos Aznaouridis ◽  
George Latsios ◽  
Gerasimos Siasos ◽  
...  

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a procedure that alters dramatically the hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who undergo this procedure. Hypothesis: We investigated the hypothesis that arterial properties and hemodynamics are affected immediately after TAVI as well as in the long-term. Methods: We enrolled 90 patients (mean age 80.2 ± 8.1 years, 50% males) with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (cfPWV and baPWV) were used for the assessment of arterial stiffness. Augmentation index corrected for heart rate (AIx@75) and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) were measured non-invasively. Measurements were conducted at baseline, after the procedure (during hospitalization) and at 1 year. Results: Acutely after TAVI we observed a statistically significant increase in arterial stiffness (7.5 ± 1.5 m/s vs 8.4 ± 1.9 m/s, p=0.001 for cfPWV and 1,773 ± 459 cm/s vs 2,383 ± 645 cm/s, p<0.001 for baPWV) without a concomitant change in systolic blood pressure (Figure). One year later, arterial stiffness was still increased compared to pre-TAVI measurements (7.5 ± 1.5 m/s vs 8.7 ± 1.7 m/s, p<0.001 for cfPWV and 1,773 ± 459 cm/s vs 2,286 ± 575 cm/s, p<0.001 for baPWV). We also found a decrease in AIx@75 (32.2 ± 12.9 % vs 27.9± 8.4 %, p=0.016) after TAVI that was attenuated at 1-year follow-up (32.2 ± 12.9 % vs 29.8± 9.1 %, p=0.38). SEVR displayed an increase acutely after TAVI (131.2 ± 30.0 % vs 148.4± 36.1 %, p=0.002) and remained improved 1 year after the procedure (131.2 ± 30.0 % vs 146± 32.2 %, p=0.01). Conclusions: In conclusion, shortly after TAVI the aorta exhibits a "stiffer" behavior in response to the acute change in hemodynamics, which settles in the long term. Our findings further elucidate the hemodynamic consequences of TAVI and may entail a prognostic role in this growing population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document