scholarly journals Variation in Internal Medicine Residency Clinic Practices: Assessing Practice Environments and Quality of Care

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 914-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Mladenovic ◽  
Judy A. Shea ◽  
F. Daniel Duffy ◽  
Lorna A. Lynn ◽  
Eric S. Holmboe ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
Ali M. Eskandar ◽  
Jami Foreback ◽  
Hilana Hatoum ◽  
Gautham Gadiraju ◽  
Ragnhild Bundesmann ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuaki Hayashino ◽  
Shunich Fukuhara ◽  
Kunihiko Matsui ◽  
Yoshinori Noguchi ◽  
Taro Minami ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1119) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arifeen Sylvanna Rahman ◽  
Siyu Shi ◽  
Pamela Katherine Meza ◽  
Justin Lee Jia ◽  
David Svec ◽  
...  

BackgroundDecreasing delays for hospitalised patients results in improved hospital efficiency, increased quality of care and decreased healthcare expenditures. Delays in subspecialty consultations and procedures can cause increased length of stay due to reasons outside of necessary medical care.ObjectiveTo quantify, describe and record reasons for delays in consultations and procedures for patients on the general medicine wards.MethodologyWe conducted weekly audits of all admitted patients on five Internal Medicine teams over 8 weeks. A survey was reviewed with attending physicians and residents on five internal medicine teams to identify patients with a delay due to consultation or procedure, quantify length of delay and record reason for delay.ResultsDuring the study period, 316 patients were reviewed and 48 were identified as experiencing a total of 53 delays due to consultations or procedures. The average delay was 1.8 days for a combined total of 83 days. Top reasons for delays included scheduling, late response to page and a busy service. The frequency in length of consult delays vary among different specialties. The highest frequency of delays was clustered in procedure-heavy specialties.ConclusionThis report highlights the importance of reviewing system barriers that lead to delayed service in hospitals. Addressing these delays could lead to reductions in length of stay for inpatients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
Khalid Mohamed Ali Dousa ◽  
Mohammed Muneer ◽  
Ali Rahil ◽  
Ahmed Al-Mohammed ◽  
Dabia AlMohanadi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Morning report, a case-based conference that allows learners and teachers to interact and discuss patient care, is a standard educational feature of internal residency programs, as well as some other specialties. Objective Our intervention was aimed at enhancing the format for morning report in our internal medicine residency program in Doha, Qatar. Intervention In July 2011, we performed a needs assessment of the 115 residents in our internal medicine residency program, using a questionnaire. Resident input was analyzed and prioritized using the percentage of residents who agreed with a given recommendation for improving morning report. We translated the input into interventions that enhanced the format and content, and improved environmental factors surrounding morning report. We resurveyed residents using the questionnaire that was used for the needs assessment. Results Key changes to the format for morning report included improving organization, adding variety to the content, enhancing case selection and the quality of presentations, and introducing patient safety and quality improvement topics into discussions. This led to a morning report format that is resident-driven, and resident-led, and that produces resident-focused learning and quality improvement activities. Conclusions Our revised morning report format is a dynamic tool, and we will continue to tailor and modify it on an ongoing basis in response to participant feedback. We recommend a process of assessing and reassessing morning report for other programs that want to enhance resident interest and participation in clinical and safety-focused discussions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez Ethnasios ◽  
Michael Rotblatt ◽  
Soma Wali

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires annual surveys of residency programs. Intervention We switched from a paper-based to a web-based survey and report on the efficiency and quality improvement gains from this change. To determine the prevalence of web-based surveys, we conducted a web-based and telephone survey of 17 internal medicine residency training programs in Southern California. Fifteen programs provided data (88% response rate). Results By making the switch, our internal medicine residency program was able to save over 50 administrative hours and over 1000 pieces of paper. A total investment of $20 for the Surveymonkey.com account (Palo Alto, CA) and approximately 15 hours to migrate the survey was made. The program administrators were able to more rapidly analyze and respond to the feedback from the residents with this system. Our survey of other programs showed that of 15 programs, 12 used a web-based survey system (80%) and 3 used a paper-based system (20%). Surveymonkey.com was the most popular system used. Conclusions We feel that the quality of response to resident feedback was enhanced by the real-time reaction to comments and assessments. Residents also appreciated the benefits of such a change. We recommend this approach to other programs that are still using paper-based surveys.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document