High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Djeniffer Elias da Silva ◽  
Antônio José Grande ◽  
Leonardo Roever ◽  
Gary Tse ◽  
Tong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Effect of high-intensity interval training protocols on VO2max and HbA1c level in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 101586
Author(s):  
Mariana Brondani de Mello ◽  
Natiele Camponogara Righi ◽  
Felipe Barreto Schuch ◽  
Luis Ulisses Signori ◽  
Antônio Marcos Vargas da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Hba1c Level ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Training Protocols

scholarly journals Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (23) ◽  
pp. 12644
Author(s):  
José Manuel Leiva-Valderrama ◽  
Adrián Montes-de-Oca-Garcia ◽  
Edgardo Opazo-Diaz ◽  
Jesus G. Ponce-Gonzalez ◽  
Guadalupe Molina-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Inflammatory Profile ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Background: Due to the prevalence and incidence worldwide of type 2 diabetes, and the significant role physical activity plays in these patients, a systematic review has been conducted to find out the effects that high-intensity interval training has on inflammatory biomarkers in subjects with type 2 diabetes. This project aims to determine the effect this training modality has on inflammatory biomarkers, in addition to observing its effects on the values of body composition and determining if this is a more effective, less effective or equally effective alternative to standard aerobic or resistance training. Methods: A search was conducted in the months of November and December 2020 on different databases: Pubmed, WoS and PEDro. A protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42021281186). The studies selected met the previously defined inclusion criteria, and the methodological quality of the papers used was evaluated according to the Downs and Black Checklist. Results: Out of 46 studies found, seven were included. The most relevant data concerning the characteristics of the clinical trials and HIIT characteristics, the values of body composition and the biomarkers under study were extracted from each study. Moreover, the results obtained from the different studies were described. Conclusions: HIIT could have an effect on inflammatory biomarkers. There is likely to be a relationship between changes in inflammatory profile and fat loss. A controlled diet may be a good complement to reduce the inflammatory profile. Further studies are required to determine whether HIIT is a better, worse or an equivalent alternative to medium-intensity aerobic exercise to improve the inflammatory profile.

553-P: Differential Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Somatosensory and Autonomic Nerve Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 553-P
Author(s):  
GIDON J. BÖNHOF ◽  
ALEXANDER STROM ◽  
MARIA APOSTOLOPOULOU ◽  
DOMINIK PESTA ◽  
MICHAEL RODEN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Autonomic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
Autonomic Nerve Function ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals Anthropometric, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Benefits of the High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate, Low-Intensity or Control for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (22) ◽  
pp. 4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lora-Pozo ◽  
Lucena-Anton ◽  
Salazar ◽  
Galán-Mercant ◽  
Moral-Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Intensity Training

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training compared with no intervention and other types of training interventions for people with Type 2 Diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that used high-interval intensity training to improve anthropometric, cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions were conducted. The search was performed during October–December 2017 using the databases PubMed, Web of Science and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the PEDro scale. A total of 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis. After statistical analysis, favorable results were obtained for high-Intensity Interval Training compared with control (non-intervention): [Weight: Standardized mean difference (SMD) = −2.09; confidence interval (CI) 95%: (−3.41; −0.78); body-mass index: SMD = −3.73; CI 95%: (−5.53; −1.93); systolic blood pressure: SMD = −4.55; CI 95%: (−8.44; −0.65); VO2max: SMD = 12.20; CI 95%: (0.26; 24.14); HbA1c: SMD = −3.72; CI 95%: (−7.34; −0.10)], moderate intensity continuous training: [body-mass index: SMD = −0.41; CI 95%: (−0.80; −0.03); VO2max: SMD = 1.91; CI 95%: (0.18; 3.64)], and low intensity training: [Weight: SMD = −2.06; CI 95%: (−2.80; −1.31); body-mass index: SMD = −3.04; CI 95%: (−5.16; −0.92); systolic blood pressure: SMD = −2.17; CI 95%: (−3.93; −0.41); HbA1c: SMD = −1.58; CI 95%: (−1.84; −1.33)]. The results show that high-intensity interval training can be a useful strategy in order to improve anthropometric, cardiopulmonary and metabolic parameters in people with Type 2 diabetes. Despite this, it could be essential to clarify and unify criteria in the intervention protocols, being necessary new lines of research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document