Marriage Markets and Male Mating Effort: Violence and Crime Are Elevated Where Men Are Rare

Human Nature ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Schacht ◽  
Douglas Tharp ◽  
Ken R. Smith
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 140402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Schacht ◽  
Monique Borgerhoff Mulder

Characterizations of coy females and ardent males are rooted in models of sexual selection that are increasingly outdated. Evolutionary feedbacks can strongly influence the sex roles and subsequent patterns of sex differentiated investment in mating effort, with a key component being the adult sex ratio (ASR). Using data from eight Makushi communities of southern Guyana, characterized by varying ASRs contingent on migration, we show that even within a single ethnic group, male mating effort varies in predictable ways with the ASR. At male-biased sex ratios, men's and women's investment in mating effort are indistinguishable; only when men are in the minority are they more inclined towards short-term, low investment relationships than women. Our results support the behavioural ecological tenet that reproductive strategies are predictable and contingent on varying situational factors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Ogola Onyango ◽  
Laurence R. Gesquiere ◽  
Jeanne Altmann ◽  
Susan C. Alberts

2006 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 748-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanie Pelletier ◽  
John T. Hogg ◽  
Marco Festa-Bianchet
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upama Aich ◽  
Megan Head ◽  
Rebecca Fox ◽  
Michael D Jennions

Older males often perform poorly under post-copulatory sexual selection. It is unclear, however, whether reproductive senescence is due to male age itself or the accumulated costs of the higher lifetime mating effort that is usually associated with male age. To date, very few studies have accounted for male mating history when testing for the effect of male age on sperm traits, and none test how age and past mating history influence paternity success under sperm competition. Here, we experimentally manipulate male mating history to tease apart its effects from that of age on ejaculate traits and paternity in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. We found that old, naive males had more sperm than old, experienced males, while the reverse was true for young males. In contrast, neither male age nor mating history affected sperm velocity. Finally, using artificial insemination to experimentally control the number of sperm per male, we found that old males sired significantly more offspring than young males independent of their mating history. Our results highlight that the general pattern of male reproductive senescence described in many taxa may often be affected by two naturally confounding factors, male mating history and sperm age, rather than male age itself.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato C. Macedo-Rego ◽  
Luiz Ernesto Costa-Schmidt ◽  
Eduardo S. A. Santos ◽  
Glauco Machado

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1955) ◽  
pp. 20210979
Author(s):  
Upama Aich ◽  
Megan L. Head ◽  
Rebecca J. Fox ◽  
Michael D. Jennions

Older males often perform poorly under post-copulatory sexual selection. It is unclear, however, whether reproductive senescence is because of male age itself or the accumulated costs of the higher lifetime mating effort that is usually associated with male age. To date, very few studies have accounted for mating history and sperm storage when testing the effect of male age on sperm traits, and none test how age and past mating history influence paternity success under sperm competition. Here, we experimentally manipulate male mating history to tease apart its effects from that of age on ejaculate traits and paternity in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki . We found that old, naive males had more sperm than old, experienced males, while the reverse was true for young males. By contrast, neither male age nor mating history affected sperm velocity. Finally, using artificial insemination to experimentally control the number of sperm per male, we found that old males sired significantly more offspring than young males independently of their mating history. Our results highlight that the general pattern of male reproductive senescence described in many taxa may often be affected by two naturally confounding factors, male mating history and sperm age, rather than male age itself.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 802-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Pintus ◽  
Stefania Uccheddu ◽  
Knut H. Røed ◽  
Javier Pérez Gonzaléz ◽  
Juan Carranza ◽  
...  

Abstract Polygynous males can change their mating tactics across their lifetime, but information is scarce on the flexibility of this trait within a given season and the relative costs and benefits of using different tactics. Here, we monitored individually marked male reindeer Rangifer tarandus and classified their mating tactics as harem-defense, sneaking, or mixed. The costs of the male reproductive effort were assessed using both direct (i.e. percentage of body mass lost) and indirect measures (i.e. activity patterns such as feeding, standing, and walking), while mating group size and reproductive success were recorded as mating effort benefits. Our results show that reindeer males may switch between the harem-defense and sneaking tactics throughout the same breeding season, providing further support to the notion that reproductive tactics are flexible in ungulates. The costs and benefits of male mating effort vary according to the mating tactic, reaching the highest values in harem-holders and the lowest values in sneaking males. Moreover, males who switched between the sneaking tactic and the harem-defence tactic tended to achieve higher mating success than males who consistently used the least costly tactic. Indeed, all harem-holders successfully sired offspring, whereas only two out of three mixed-tactic males sired one calf, and sneaking males did not sire any calves. In conclusion, our results show that reindeer males can modulate their mating efforts during the same breeding season by switching between the most costly harem-defense tactic and the least costly sneaking tactic, suggesting individual solutions to the balance between reproductive effort and mating opportunities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document