Evaluation of Predictive Value of P-POSSUM Score in Patients Operated for Acute Abdomen and Comparison of Scoring at Admission and Pre-operatively

Author(s):  
Nitin Garg ◽  
Arpit Bandi
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (37) ◽  
pp. 3252-3256
Author(s):  
Suhas Devanathan ◽  
Darshana Tote ◽  
Sandip Shinde

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis is very commonly diagnosed when a patient presents with acute abdomen. This is more commonly seen in the young and middle-aged individuals. The clinical signs and symptoms determine the diagnosis and management. Scoring systems are in plenty to diagnose acute appendicitis and mainly include the presenting signs and symptoms, but are not acceptable for all populations with different age groups. Modified Alvarado scoring system is a timed tested scoring system used in different populations and age groups with good efficacy and to provide a bedside clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness of modified Alvarado score in the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODS A prospective observational study was done which incorporated 50 patients presenting with the signs and symptoms pointing out to acute appendicitis, clinically. The patients were evaluated by Modified Alvarado score during admission and based on the treating surgeon’s decision, were operated. Finally, the score was compared with the diagnosis achieved with a histopathological examination of the operated specimen. RESULTS The sensitivity of raja isteri penigran anak saleha appendicitis (RIPASA) score was 70.58 %, specificity was 68.75 %, positive predictive value (PPV) was 82.75 %, negative predictive value (NPV) of RIPASA score was 52.38 % and the diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score was 70 %. CONCLUSIONS Modified Alvarado scoring system is simple scoring system which can be used in a bedside manner but uses specific and limited features for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis which limits the effectiveness of this scoring system. KEY WORDS Acute Abdomen, Clinical Scoring System, Modified Alvarado Scoring System


1958 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 797-808
Author(s):  
H.L. Bockus
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 469-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Boorjian ◽  
Sameer A. Siddiqui ◽  
Brant A. Inman ◽  
Jeffrey M. Slezak ◽  
R. Jeffrey Karnes ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 483-483
Author(s):  
Charlie Jung ◽  
Michael S. Cookson ◽  
Matthew J. Putzi ◽  
Sam S. Chang ◽  
Joseph A. Smith ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 464-464
Author(s):  
Ithaar H. Derweesh ◽  
Gaspar A. Motta-Ramirez ◽  
Mahesh Gael ◽  
Nancy Obuchowski ◽  
Hazem A. Moneim ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 383-383
Author(s):  
Rainer Kuefer ◽  
Matthias D. Hofer ◽  
Christoph Zorn ◽  
Bjoern G. Volkmer ◽  
Juergen E. Gschwend ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 450-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Flores ◽  
Ángel García-Avello ◽  
Esther Alonso ◽  
Antonio Ruíz ◽  
Olga Navarrete ◽  
...  

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared it with an ELISA D-dimer (VIDAS D-dimer) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients and methods: We studied 127 consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected PE. The diagnosis of PE was based on a clinical probability pretest for PE and a strict protocol of imaging studies. A plasma sample to measure the levels of tPA and D-dimer was obtained at enrollment. Diagnostic accuracy for tPA and D-dimer was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the diagnostic utility of tPA with a cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL and D-dimer with a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, were calculated for PE diagnosis. Results: PE was confirmed in 41 patients (32 %). Areas under ROC curves were 0.86 for D-dimer and 0.71 for tPA. The sensitivity/negative predictive value for D-dimer using a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, and tPA using a cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL, were 95 % (95 % CI, 88–100 %)/95 % (95 % CI, 88–100 %) and 95 % (95 % CI, 88–100 %)/94 %), respectively. The diagnostic utility to exclude PE was 28.3 % (95 % CI, 21–37 %) for D-dimer and 24.4 % (95 % CI, 17–33 %) for tPA. Conclusions: The tPA with a cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for exclusion of PE, similar to those observed for the VIDAS D-dimer with a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, although the diagnostic utility was slightly higher for the D-dimer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document