scholarly journals Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Derks ◽  
◽  
S. Houterman ◽  
G. S. C. Geuzebroek ◽  
P. van der Harst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Acute Mi

Abstract Background In multiple studies, the potential relationship between daylight saving time (DST) and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been investigated, with mixed results. Using the Dutch Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) registry facilitated by the Netherlands Heart Registration, we investigated whether the transitions to and from DST interact with the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI. Methods We assessed changes in hospital admissions for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) undergoing PCI between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We compared the incidence rate of PCI procedures during the first 3 or 7 days after the transition with that during a control period (2 weeks before transition plus second week after transition). Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using Poisson regression. Potential gender differences were also investigated. Results A total of 80,970 PCI procedures for STEMI or NSTEMI were performed. No difference in incidence rate a week after the transition to DST in spring was observed for STEMI (IRR 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.03) or NSTEMI (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.12). After the transition from DST in autumn, the IRR was also comparable with the control period (STEMI: 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.12, and NSTEMI: 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.06). Observing the first 3 days after each transition yielded similar results. Gender-specific results were comparable. Conclusion Based on data from a large, nationwide registry, there was no correlation between the transition to or from DST and a change in the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI.

Short and Midterm Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of the Nationwide TURKMI Registry

Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 000331972097530
Author(s):  
Mustafa Kilickap ◽  
Mustafa Kemal Erol ◽  
Meral Kayikcioglu ◽  
Ibrahim Kocayigit ◽  
Mesut Gitmez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Acute Mi

This recent Turkish Myocardial Infarction registry reported that guidelines are largely implemented in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) in Turkey. We aimed to obtain up-to-date information for short- and midterm outcomes of acute MI. Fifty centers were selected using probability sampling, and all consecutive patients with acute MI admitted to these centers (between November 1 and 16, 2018) were enrolled. Among 1930 (mean age 62 ± 13 years, 26% female) patients, 1195 (62%) had non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 735 (38%) had ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 94.4% of patients with STEMI and 60.2% of those with NSTEMI. Periprocedural mortality occurred in 4 (0.3%) patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in STEMI than in patients with NSTEMI (5.4% vs 2.9%, respectively; P = .006). However, the risk became slightly higher in the NSTEMI group at 1 year. Women with STEMI had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with men (11.2% vs 3.8%; P < .001); this persisted at follow-up. In conclusion, PCI is performed in Turkey with a low risk of complications in patients with acute MI. Compared with a previous registry, in-hospital mortality decreased by 50% within 20 years; however, the risk remains too high for women with STEMI.

scholarly journals Acute Myocardial Infarction and Daylight Saving Time Transitions: Is There a Risk?

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-557
Author(s):  
Viktor Čulić ◽  
Thomas Kantermann
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Transitional Period ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
The Moment

Available evidence on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the days after the spring daylight saving time (DST) transition suggests either a modest increase or no risk increase. Partial sleep deprivation and enhanced circadian clock misalignment have been implicated as the underlying mechanisms for increased AMI risk, probably via enhanced thrombo-inflammatory processes and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Most of the studies, as we suggest as a perspective here, have used potentially inappropriate control periods, including the two post-transitional weeks, because adjustment after the spring DST transition lasts at least four weeks for all chronotypes and probably even beyond this period for late chronotypes. The most plausible conclusions, at the moment, for the risk of AMI after the spring DST transition are: (1) the risk is increased, (2) a relatively modest risk increase could be currently underestimated or in some studies undetected, (3) late chronotypes and/or individuals with high levels of social jetlag (a proxy for circadian clock misalignment) could be more affected by the phenomenon, and (4) underlying pathophysiological mechanisms should be further explored. As a significant part of world’s population continues to be affected by the biannual clock change, the question of increased AMI risk in the post-transitional period remains an intriguing public health issue.

scholarly journals Daylight saving time and acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Manzoli ◽  
M E Flacco ◽  
F Bravi ◽  
T Carradori ◽  
R Cappadona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Summary Relative Risk

Abstract Background The current evidence on the effects of daylight saving time (DST) transitions on major cardiovascular diseases is limited, and available results are conflicting. We carried out the first meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following DST transitions. Methods We searched MedLine and Scopus up to December 31, 2018, with no language restriction, to retrieve cohort or case-control studies evaluating AMI incidence among adults (≥18y) in the week following spring and/or autumn DST shifts versus control periods. A summary relative risk of AMI was computed after: (1) spring, (2) autumn, (3) both transitions considered together versus control weeks. Stratified analyses were performed by gender and age. Data were combined using a generic inverse-variance approach. Results Seven studies (&gt;115,000 subjects) were included in the analyses. A significantly higher risk of AMI (Odds Ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) was observed in the two weeks following spring or winter DST transitions. The risk increase was however significant only after the spring shift (OR: 1.05; 1.02-1.07), while AMI incidence in the week after winter DST transition was comparable to control periods (OR 1.01; 0.98-1.04). No substantial differences by age or gender emerged. Conclusions The risk of AMI increases modestly but significantly following DST transitions, supporting the proposal of DST shifts discontinuation. Additional studies fully adjusting for potential confounders are required to confirm the present findings. Key messages The risk of acute myocardial infarction increases modestly but significantly following DST transitions. Although preliminary, our findings support the proposal of DST shifts discontinuation.

scholarly journals Daylight Saving Time and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Manfredini ◽  
Fabio Fabbian ◽  
Rosaria Cappadona ◽  
Alfredo De Giorgi ◽  
Francesca Bravi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: The available evidence on the effects of daylight saving time (DST) transitions on major cardiovascular diseases is limited and conflicting. We carried out the first meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following DST transitions. Methods: We searched cohort or case-control studies evaluating the incidence of AMI, among adults (≥18 y), during the weeks following spring and/or autumn DST shifts, versus control periods. The search was made in MedLine and Scopus, up to 31 December 2018, with no language restriction. A summary odds ratio of AMI was computed after: (1) spring, (2) autumn or (3) both transitions considered together. Meta-analyses were also stratified by gender and age. Data were combined using a generic inverse-variance approach. Results: Seven studies (>115,000 subjects) were included in the analyses. A significantly higher risk of AMI (Odds Ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01–1.06) was observed during the two weeks following spring or autumn DST transitions. However, although AMI risk increased significantly after the spring shift (OR: 1.05; 1.02–1.07), the incidence of AMI during the week after winter DST transition was comparable with control periods (OR 1.01; 0.98–1.04). No substantial differences were observed when the analyses were stratified by age or gender. Conclusion: The risk of AMI increases modestly but significantly after DST transitions, supporting the proposal of DST shifts discontinuation. Additional studies that fully adjust for potential confounders are required to confirm the present findings.

Increasing the Penetration of Primary Angioplasty in Europe

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Kaifoszova ◽  
Petr Widimsky ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Success Factor ◽  
The Balkans ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) treatment guidelines as the preferred treatment for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) whenever it is available within 90–120 minutes of the first medical contact. A survey conducted in 2008 in 51 ESC countries found that the annual incidence of hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction is around 1,900 patients per million population, with an incidence of STEMI of about 800 per million. It showed that STEMI patients’ access to reperfusion therapy and the use of PPCI or thrombolysis (TL) vary considerably between countries. Northern, western and central Europe already have well-developed PPCI services, offering PPCI to 60–90 % of all STEMI patients. Southern Europe and the Balkans are still predominantly using TL. Where this is the case, a higher proportion of patients are left without any reperfusion treatment. The survey concluded that a nationwide PPCI strategy results in more patients being offered reperfusion therapy. To address the inequalities in STEMI patients’ access to life-saving PPCI, and to support the implementation of the ESC STEMI treatment guidelines in Europe, the Stent for Life (SFL) Initiative was launched jointly by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and EuroPCR in 2008. National cardiac societies from Bulgaria, France, Greece, Serbia, Spain and Turkey signed the SFL Declaration at the ESC Congress in Barcelona in 2009. The aim of the SFL Initiative is to improve the delivery of, and STEMI patients’ access to, life-saving PPCI and thereby reduce mortality and morbidity. Currently, 10 national cardiac societies support the SFL Initiative in their respective countries. SFL national action programmes have been developed and are being implemented in several countries. The formation of regional PPCI networks involving emergency medical services, non-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals and PPCI centres is considered to be a critical success factor in implementing PPCI services effectively. This article describes examples of how SFL countries are progressing in implementing their national programmes, thus increasing PPCI penetration in Europe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document