Effect of long-term exposure to sulfides on taurine transporter gene expression in the gill of the deep-sea mussel Bathymodiolus platifrons, which harbors a methanotrophic symbiont

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Koito ◽  
Ikumi Nakamura-Kusakabe ◽  
Takao Yoshida ◽  
Tadashi Maruyama ◽  
Tamano Omata ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaleida Napoli ◽  
Giuseppe Seghieri ◽  
Loria Bianchi ◽  
Roberto Anichini ◽  
Alessandra De Bellis ◽  
...  

Background. Taurine transporter gene expression (RNA-TauT) has a role in retinal cell function and is modulatedin vitroandin vivoby hyperglycemia and/or oxidative stress. This study was aimed at testing whether RNA-TauT gene expression is modified in blood mononuclear peripheral cells (MPCs) of type 1 diabetic patients, is related to plasma markers of oxidative stress or endothelial dysfunction, or, finally, is related to presence of retinopathy.Methods. RNA-TauT was measured in MPCs by real-time PCR-analysis in 35 type 1 diabetic patients and in 33 age- and sex-matched controls, additionally measuring plasma and cell taurine and markers of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction.Results. RNA-TauT, expressed as2-ΔΔCt, was significantly higher in MPCs of type 1 diabetic patients than in controls [median (interquartile range): 1.32(0.31) versus 1.00(0.15);P=0.01]. In diabetic patients RNA-TauT was related to HbA1c (r=0.42;P=0.01) and inversely to plasma homocysteine (r=-0.39;P=0.02) being additionally significantly higher in MPCs of patients without retinopathy [(n=22); 1.36(0.34)] compared to those with retinopathy [(n=13); 1.16(0.20)], independently from HbA1c or diabetes duration.Conclusions. RNA-TauT gene expression is significantly upregulated in MPCs of type 1 diabetes patients and is related to HbA1c levels and inversely to plasma homocysteine. Finally, in diabetes patients, RNA-TauT upregulation seems to be blunted in patients with retinopathy independently of their metabolic control or longer diabetes duration.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Golaleh Asghari ◽  
Emad Yuzbashian ◽  
Maryam Zarkesh ◽  
Parvin Mirmiran ◽  
Mehdi Hedayati ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresia H Mina ◽  
Callam Davidson ◽  
Ashley Taylor ◽  
Jane E Norman ◽  
Rebecca M Reynolds

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Calin-Jageman ◽  
Irina Calin-Jageman ◽  
Tania Rosiles ◽  
Melissa Nguyen ◽  
Annette Garcia ◽  
...  

[[This is a Stage 1 Registered Report manuscript. The project was submitted for review to eNeuro. Upon revision and acceptance, this version of the manuscript was pre-registered on the OSF (9/11/2019, https://osf.io/fqh8j) (but due to an oversight not posted as a preprint until July 2020). A Stage 2 manuscript is now posted as a pre-print (https://psyarxiv.com/h59jv) and is under review at eNeuro. A link to the final Stage 2 manuscript will be added when available.]]There is fundamental debate about the nature of forgetting: some have argued that it represents the decay of the memory trace, others that the memory trace persists but becomes inaccessible due to retrieval failure. These different accounts of forgetting make different predictions about savings memory, the rapid re-learning of seemingly forgotten information. If forgetting is due to decay then savings requires re-encoding and should thus involve the same mechanisms as initial learning. If forgetting is due to retrieval-failure then savings should be mechanistically distinct from encoding. In this registered report we conducted a pre-registered and rigorous test between these accounts of forgetting. Specifically, we used microarray to characterize the transcriptional correlates of a new memory (1 day from training), a forgotten memory (8 days from training), and a savings memory (8 days from training but with a reminder on day 7 to evoke a long-term savings memory) for sensitization in Aplysia californica (n = 8 samples/group). We find that the transcriptional correlates of savings are [highly similar / somewhat similar / unique] relative to new (1-day-old) memories. Specifically, savings memory and a new memory share [X] of [Y] regulated transcripts, show [strong / moderate / weak] similarity in sets of regulated transcripts, and show [r] correlation in regulated gene expression, which is [substantially / somewhat / not at all] stronger than at forgetting. Overall, our results suggest that forgetting represents [decay / retrieval-failure / mixed mechanisms].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document