Soil Matric Potential-Based Irrigation Scheduling to Potato in the Northwestern Indian Plains

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Ahuja ◽  
D. S. Khurana ◽  
Kulbir Singh
2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1327-1348
Author(s):  
Andrés F. Jiménez ◽  
Brenda V. Ortiz ◽  
Luca Bondesan ◽  
Guilherme Morata ◽  
Damianos Damianidis

HighlightsNARX and LSTM recurrent neural networks were evaluated for prediction of irrigation prescriptions.LSTM neural networks presented the best performance for irrigation scheduling using soil matric potential sensors.NARX neural networks had the best performance for predicting irrigation prescriptions using weather data.High performance for several time-ahead predictions using both recurrent neural networks, with R2 > 0.94.The results can be adopted as a decision-support tool in irrigation scheduling for fields with different types of soils.Abstract. The implementation of adequate irrigation strategies could be done through real-time monitoring of soil water status at several soil depths; however, this could also represent a complex nonlinear problem due to the plant-soil-weather relationships. In this study, two recurrent neural network (RNN) models were evaluated to estimate irrigation prescriptions. Data for this study were collected from an on-farm corn irrigation study conducted between 2017 and 2019 in Samson, Alabama. The study used hourly data of weather and soil matric potential (SMP) monitored at three soil depths from 13 sensor probes installed on a loamy fine sand soil and a sandy clay loam soil. Two neural network methods, i.e., a nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous (NARX) input system and long short-term memory (LSTM), were trained, validated, and tested with a maximum dataset of 20,052 records and a maximum of eight categorical attributes to estimate one-step irrigation prescriptions. The performance of both methods was evaluated by varying the model development parameters (neurons or blocks, dropout, and epochs) and determining their impact on the final model prediction. Results showed that both RNN models demonstrated good capability in the prediction of irrigation prescriptions for the soil types studied, with a coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.94 and root mean square error (RMSE) < 1.2 mm. The results of this study indicate that after training the RNNs using the dataset collected in the field, models using only SMP sensors at three soil depths obtained the best performance, followed by models that used only data of solar radiation, temperature, and relative humidity in the prediction of irrigation prescriptions. For future applicability, the RNN models can be extended using datasets from other places for training, which would allow the adoption of a unique data-driven soil moisture model for irrigation scheduling useful in a wide range of soil types. Keywords: Corn, Irrigation scheduling, Machine learning, Modeling, Soil matric potential sensor.


HortScience ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1620-1625
Author(s):  
Abby B. Griffin ◽  
Amy N. Wright ◽  
Kenneth M. Tilt ◽  
D. Joseph Eakes

The effect of five irrigation scheduling treatments on shoot growth [growth index (GI)] and stem water potential (SWP) of Itea virginica L. ‘Henry's Garnet’ (‘Henry's Garnet’ sweetspire) and Rhododendron austrinum Rehd. (Florida flame azalea) were studied. Plants were transplanted on 13 Mar. 2008 at soil grade level under shade structures in field plots of sandy loam soil on the Auburn University campus in Auburn, AL. Matric potential was continuously measured 7.6 cm from the stem in the root ball and 20.3 cm from the stem in the soil backfill for three plants per treatment per taxa. Irrigation scheduling treatments included (in order of decreasing irrigation frequency): root ball and surrounding soil matric potential maintained at or above –25 kPa [well-watered (WW)]; root ball and surrounding soil rewatered when root ball matric potential dropped to either –50 kPa (50RB) or –75 kPa (75RB); and root ball and surrounding soil rewatered when surrounding soil matric potential dropped to either –25 kPa (25S) or –50 kPa (50S). In both taxa, GI increased linearly over time in all five irrigation treatments. For I. virginica ‘Henry's Garnet’, GI increased most in WW and 25S treatments followed by 50S, 50RB, and 75RB. Shoot growth of R. austrinum was similar among treatments. Both I. virginica ‘Henry's Garnet’ and R. austrinum had a larger increase in GI during the first growing season (2008). For I. virginica ‘Henry's Garnet’, SWP was higher in 50S and 75RB treatments than in 50RB, WW, and 25S. For R. austrinum, SWP was not different among treatments. Results indicate that although plant growth might be diminished slightly, irrigation frequency can be reduced without compromising plant visual quality or survival if root ball and soil matric potential is monitored. Additionally, until roots grow into the backfill soil, monitoring both backfill soil and root ball matric potential is important for scheduling and reducing post-transplant irrigation applications.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Kukal ◽  
G. S. Hira ◽  
A. S. Sidhu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document