Weed management and the habitat protection of rare species: A case study of the endemic hawaiian fern Marsilea villosa

1994 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndon Wester
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-854
Author(s):  
Guoqi Chen ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Linhong Jin ◽  
Zhuo Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractFarmer training is important to improve weed management practices in tea cultivation. To explore the group characteristics of tea growers, we interviewed 354 growers in Guizhou Province, China. Sixty-one percent of the respondents planted tea for companies or cooperative groups, and 56% managed tea gardens larger than 10 ha. Self-employed tea growers tended to be older and smallholders, and to apply herbicides and conduct weed control less frequently (P < 0.05). Approximately 87% of the respondents conducted weed control two to four times yr−1, 83% spent between $200 and $2,000 ha−1 yr−1 for weed control, and 42% thought weed control costs would decrease by 5 years from this study. Twenty-eight species were mentioned by the respondents as being the most serious. According to canonical correspondence analysis, latitude, altitude, being self-employed or a member of a cooperative, having training experience in tea-garden weed management, and frequency and cost of weed control in tea gardens had significant (P < 0.05) influence on the composition of most troublesome weed species listed by respondents. Among the respondents, 60% had had farmer’s training on weed management in tea gardens. Of these, a significant number (P < 0.05) tended to think weed control costs would decrease, and a nonsignificant number (P > 0.05) tended to conduct weed control more frequently and have lower weed management costs in their tea gardens.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROB WILLIAMS ◽  
SHARON L. HEDLEY ◽  
TREVOR A. BRANCH ◽  
MARK V. BRAVINGTON ◽  
ALEXANDRE N. ZERBINI ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Venturas ◽  
Salvia García Álvarez ◽  
Miriam Fajardo Alcántara ◽  
Carmen Collada ◽  
Luis Gil

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saima Hashim ◽  
Asad Jan ◽  
Shah Fahad ◽  
Hafiz Haider Ali ◽  
Muhammad Naeem Mushtaq ◽  
...  

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zakaria Hossain ◽  
Masakazu Komatsuzaki

The use of robots is increasing in agriculture, but there is a lack of suitable robotic technology for weed management in orchards. A robotic lawnmower (RLM) was installed, and its performance was studied between 2017 and 2019 in a pear orchard (1318 m2) at Ibaraki University, Ami. We found that the RLM could control the weeds in an orchard throughout a year at a minimum height (average weed height, WH: 44 ± 15 mm, ± standard deviation (SD) and dry weed biomass, DWB: 103 ± 25 g m−2). However, the RLM experiences vibration problems while running over small pears (33 ± 8 mm dia.) during fruit thinning periods, which can stop blade mobility. During pear harvesting, fallen fruits (80 ± 12 mm dia.) strike the blade and become stuck within the chassis of the RLM; consequently, the machine stops frequently. We estimated the working performance of a riding mower (RM), brush cutter (BC), and a walking mower (WM) in a pear orchard and compared the mowing cost (annual ownership, repair and maintenance, energy, oil, and labor) with the RLM. The study reveals that the RLM performs better than other conventional mowers in a small orchard (0.33 ha). For a medium (0.66 ha) and larger (1 ha) orchard, the RLM is not more cost-effective than RM and WM. However, the existing RLM performed weed control well and showed promise for profitability in our research field. We believe that, if field challenges like fallen fruit and tree striking problems can be properly addressed, the RLM could be successfully used in many small orchards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document