Relationship between hot-spot formation and second breakdown in transistors

1970 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Shah ◽  
S. X. Hu ◽  
I. V. Igumenshchev ◽  
J. Baltazar ◽  
D. Cao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (34) ◽  
pp. 5550-5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tran Thi Bich Quyen ◽  
Wei-Nien Su ◽  
Ching-Hsiang Chen ◽  
John Rick ◽  
Jyong-Yue Liu ◽  
...  

Trimetallic nanocages possess inter-metallic synergies among elements and are able to generate significant SERS signal enhancement due to “hot spot” formation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 720-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Shishido ◽  
Reina Morishima ◽  
Yusuke Yoshinaga ◽  
Sadao Hasegawa ◽  
Tsunehiro Tanaka

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin L. Abell ◽  
Jeremy D. Driskell ◽  
Yiping Zhao

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 1884-1893 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Drouet ◽  
Didier Picart ◽  
Patrice Bailly ◽  
Eric Bruneton

1992 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Mellor ◽  
D. A. Wiegand ◽  
K. B. Isom

AbstractInterest in the mechanisms by which hot spots either grow to sustained reaction or are quenched results from the observation that the energy required to ignite a propellant or explosive can be significantly less than that needed to bulk heat a test specimen uniformly to its ignition temperature. This result is independent of the original form of non-thermal energy and has been used to interpret data for shock, impact, friction and electrostatic discharge (ESD) stimuli. We present new flowcharts which include 1) events resulting in hot spot formation and 2) subsequent pathways which lead to sustained reaction or quenching. The mechanism appears capable of categorizing and demonstrating the similarities and differences between hot spot growth or quenching, for impact and ESD stimuli. Sample confinement and temperature and stimulus duration are the independent variables whose roles are particularly clarified in the mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document