Maternal serum markers for fetal trisomy 21 screening

Author(s):  
Françoise Muller ◽  
Laurence Bussières
Author(s):  
K Spencer ◽  
D A Aitken ◽  
J A Crossley ◽  
G McCaw ◽  
E Berry ◽  
...  

The potential efficacy of screening for trisomy 21 in the first trimester, using maternal serum markers α fetoprotein, free β human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated oestriol and pregnancy associated plasma protein A, was studied in an unselected population of women between the seventh and fourteenth week of gestation. Using a combination of α fetoprotein and free β human chorionic gonadotropin, 53% of affected pregnancies could be identified at a false positive rate of 5%. Unconjugated oestriol and pregnancy associated plasma protein A levels were lower in cases of trisomy 21, but their inclusion with other markers did not significantly improve detection rate. Monitoring the same pregnancies also in the second trimester showed that screening in the first trimester identified the same cases as in the second. We conclude that first trimester screening using free β human chorionic gonadotropin and α fetoprotein, is a viable possibility and will lead to detection rates in excess of 50%. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.


2011 ◽  
pp. 112-126
Author(s):  

Objectives: Design an “in-house” software for calculating the risk of fetus has Down syndrome, Edwards syndrome and open neural tube defects in prenatal screening at the gestational aged 15-22. Methods: Based on the Excel program of Microsoft Office and the articles with the Excel of Microsoft Office and related published articles, we design an “in-house” software based on maternal age, gestational age, history of having children with chromosomal aberrations and adjusted maternal serum markers AFP, hCG and uE3. The results were compared with the results of Prisca software by non-parametric method. Results: In cases having the risk of trisomy 21 with the range from 1/251 to 1/350: the risk tends to be lower than Prisca (83.7%). In cases having the high risks of trisomy 21 in screening but the results of prenatal diagnosis are not trisomy: the risks of “in house” software are lower than the risks of Prisca (73%) with 29% of cases has the risks less than 1/250 . In cases of trisomy 18 with the risks are lower than 1/150: there are no statistical significant differences between the two softwares (P<0.05). In screening open neural tube defects, the cases have the threshold higher than 1.50 MoM AFP: The results in the “in house” software tend to higher than Prisca (94%). The cases have the threshold lower than 1.50 MoM AFP: Where the disability screening of neural tube openings with thresholds lower than 1.5 MoM AFP: there are no statistical significant differences between the two softwares (P<0.05). Conclusion: The “in house” software has all the necessary functions for calculating the risk of Down syndrome, Edwards syndrome and open neural tube at the gestational aged 15-22.


Author(s):  
Shady A. Saleem

Down syndromes are the most commonly recognized genetic cause of mental retardation.  The risk of trisomy 21 is directly related to maternal age, neuchal translucency, nasal bone, tricuspid valve regurgitation and fetal heart rate. Also, maternal serum markers must be included to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasound screening of Down syndrome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-143
Author(s):  
Sarang Younesi ◽  
Shahram Savad ◽  
Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Taheri-Amin ◽  
Pourandokht Saadati ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Sue Hyun Oh ◽  
Heung Yeol Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document