Reproductive performance of confined sheep in an accelerated controlled breeding program under two lighting regimes

1982 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Hackett ◽  
M.S. Wolynetz
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (sp1) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panantharayil Sudhayam Shyne Anand ◽  
Changaramkumarath P. Balasubramanian ◽  
Biju Francis ◽  
Akshaya Panigrahi ◽  
Radhakrishnapillai Aravind ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-932
Author(s):  
E. F. Ellington ◽  
A. D. Knight ◽  
C. W. Fox

1982 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1109-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. HACKETT ◽  
H. A. ROBERTSON ◽  
H. A. ROBERTSON ◽  
R. J. DWYER ◽  
M. S. WOLYNETZ

Six experiments were conducted on hormonally treated ewes maintained year-round in a controlled-light environment in a breeding program designed to produce three lamb crops in 2 yr. Various combinations of fluorogestone acetate (FGA), prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) and pregnant mares' serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) were used to synchronize estrus in the ewes. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in fertility between FGA- and PGF2α-treated ewes when the ewes were having cyclic ovarian activity (cycling) at the time of treatment, i.e. in January and May in our system. Among ewes in the constant day-length lighting regime, fertility was lower in September than in January or May. Prolificacy ranged from 1.7 to 2.0 in the six experiments. Fecundity, a measure of the overall productivity, followed a similar pattern to fertility and was not significantly (P > 0.05) affected by the various treatments. These findings demonstrated the feasibility of maintaining a controlled 8-mo breeding program for sheep maintained year-round in a controlled-light environment. Key words: Reproduction in sheep, controlled light, hormone treatment effects.


ЖАРКОВА И.П., ГРИШИНА Д. С. Федеральный научный центр «Всероссийский научно-исследовательский и технологический институт птицеводства» Российской академии наук Аннотация: Авторами изучены генетические параметры хозяйственно-полезных признаков гусей (сохранность, яйценоскость, масса яиц, оплодотворенность и выводимость яиц, вывод гусят) в зависимости от их происхождения. Новизна работы заключается в том, что впервые проведен анализ закономерностей проявления репродуктивных качеств у родственных групп гусей. При сравнительном изучении 21 породы гусей установлено, что группа пород гусей, родственных между собой по общему селекционному предку, а именно китайской серой породе (1-я родословная), имеет более высокие воспроизводительные способности по сравнению с другими породами и группами пород. Полученные данные будут применяться в дальнейшей работе с целью совершенствования приемов сохранения генофонда малочисленных пород гусей. Ключевые слова: ГЕНОФОНД ПОРОД ГУСЕЙ, РОДСТВЕННЫЕ ГРУППЫ, РЕПРОДУКТИВНЫЕ КАЧЕСТВА, GENE POOL OF GEESE BREEDS, BIOGENETICALLY RELATED GROUPS OF BREEDS, REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE


Intermittent Lighting Improves the Efficiency of Artificial Insemination in Cage Housed Laying Hens Kavtarashvili A.Sh., Kolokolnikova T.N. Federal Scientific Center “All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute” of Russian Academy of Sciences Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center Summary: The effects of different lighting regimes on the oviposition schedule, productive performance, and reproductive efficiency in cage housed laying hens of layer parental flock (Hisex White-R) were studied; the reasonable regime of artificial insemination (AI) under intermittent lighting is proposed. It was found that intermittent lighting regime 1L:4D:4L:1D:4L:10D compared to the constant lighting significantly alters oviposition schedule: under this regime 82.3% of all daily eggs were laid until 9 am (vs. 66.6% in control). This regime and AI at 10 am improved the productive and reproductive performance compared to control (constant lighting 16L:8D and AI at 12 am): mortality by 1.9%, egg production per initial hen by 3.8%, egg weight by 1.1%, percentage of eggs suitable for incubation by 1.9%, egg fertility by 0.9%, hatchability by 2.3%, hatch of chicks by 2.9%, feed conversion ratio (kg of feed per 10 eggs) by 5.3%, the expenses of electric energy for lighting (per 1000 eggs suitable for incubation) by 54.5%. Key words: INTERMITTENT LIGHTING, CAGE HOUSED LAYERS, ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION (AI), OVIPOSITION SCHEDULE, AI TIMING, PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document