Basin effects analysis from a dense strong motion observation network

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. A378
Keyword(s):  
Strong Motion ◽  
Observation Network ◽  
Basin Effects

Basin effects analysis from a dense strong motion observation network

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1069-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Liang Wen ◽  
Han-Yih Peng ◽  
Liang-Fang Liu ◽  
Tzay-Chyn Shin
Keyword(s):  
Strong Motion ◽  
Observation Network ◽  
Basin Effects

30 Ooctober 2020 Samos-Sigacik Earthquake: On Strong Ground Motion and Local Site Amplification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eser Çakti ◽  
Karin Sesetyan ◽  
Ufuk Hancilar ◽  
Merve Caglar ◽  
Emrullah Dar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Strong Ground Motion ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Aegean Sea ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Local Site ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Strong Ground

<p>The Mw 6.9 earthquake that took place offshore between the Greek island of Samos and Turkey’s İzmir province on 30 October 2020 came hardly as a surprise. Due to the extensional tectonic regime of the Aegean and high deformation rates, earthquakes of similar size frequently occur in the Aegean Sea on fault segments close to the shores of Turkey, affecting the settlements on mainland Turkey and on the Greek Islands. Samos-Sigacik earthquake had a normal faulting mechanism. It was recorded by the strong motion networks in Turkey and Greece. Although expected, the earthquake was an  outstanding event in the sense of  highly localized, significant levels of building damage as a result of amplified ground motion levels. This presentation is an overview of strong ground motion characteristics of this important event both regionally and locally. Mainshock records suggest that local site effects, enhanced by basin effects could be responsible for structural damage in central Izmir, the third largest city of Turkey located at 60-70 km epicentral distance. We installed a seven-station network in Bayraklı and Karşıyaka districts of İzmir within three days of the mainshock in search of site and basin effects.  Through analysis of recorded aftershocks we explore the amplification characeristics of soils in the two aforementioned districts  and try to understand the role basin effects might have played in the resulting ground motion levels and consequently damage. </p>

Basin Amplification Effects in the Puget Lowland, Washington, from Strong-Motion Recordings and 3D Simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 534-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Thompson ◽  
Erin A. Wirth ◽  
Arthur D. Frankel ◽  
J. Renate Hartog ◽  
John E. Vidale
Keyword(s):  
Surface Waves ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Puget Sound ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
Amplification Factors ◽  
Megathrust Earthquakes ◽  
Local Earthquakes ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Basin Edge

ABSTRACT Sedimentary basins in the Puget Sound region, Washington State, increase ground-motion intensity and duration of shaking during local earthquakes. We analyze Pacific Northwest Seismic Network and U.S. Geological Survey strong-motion recordings of five local earthquakes (M 3.9–6.8), including the 2001 Nisqually earthquake, to characterize sedimentary basin effects within the Seattle and Tacoma basins. We observe basin-edge generated surface waves at sites within the Seattle basin for most ray paths that cross the Seattle fault zone. We also note previously undocumented basin-edge surface waves in the Tacoma basin during one of the local earthquakes. To place quantitative constraints on basin amplification, we determine amplification factors by computing the spectral ratios of inside-basin sites to outside-basin sites at 1, 2, 3, and 5 s periods. Ground shaking is amplified in the Seattle basin for all the earthquakes analyzed and for a subset of events in the Tacoma basin. We find that the largest amplification factors in the Seattle basin are produced by a shallow earthquake located to the southwest of the basin. Our observation suggests that future shallow crustal and megathrust earthquakes rupturing west of the Puget Lowland will produce greater amplification within the Seattle basin than has been seen for intraslab events. We also perform ground-motion simulations using a finite-difference method to validate a 3D Cascadia velocity model (CVM) by comparing properties of observed and synthetic waveforms up to a frequency of 1 Hz. Basin-edge effects are well reproduced in the Seattle basin, but are less well resolved in the Tacoma basin. Continued study of basin effects in the Tacoma basin would improve the CVM.

scholarly journals Arias Intensity Attenuation Relationship in Sichuan-yunnan Region, China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Liu ◽  
Tongjie Ren
Keyword(s):  
Site Effects ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Attenuation Relationship ◽  
Intensity Measure ◽  
Arias Intensity ◽  
Intensity Attenuation ◽  
Yunnan Region ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Average Shear ◽  
Basin Effects

Abstract Arias intensity is an essential ground motion measure correlating with the potential for earthquake-induced landslides. The Sichuan-Yunnan region, which is primarily mountainous, is a high incidence region of earthquake-induced landslides in China. However, there is no available attenuation relationship for this intensity measure due to the backward construction of the stations. In this study, we developed a region-specific Arias intensity attenuation relationship using the China Strong-Motion Networks Center (CSMNC) database which was established in 2008. We recommend this relationship be applied in the Sichuan-Yunnan region for moment magnitudes ranging between 4.2 and 7.9, distances ranging between 0 and 400 km and with Vs30 (the average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 meters of a soil profile) ranging between 128 and 760 m/s. The current study finds that this relationship’s intra-event, inter-event, and total standard deviations are greater than for other regions. This is likely caused by the complicated seismotectonic activities, nonlinear site effects, error from inferring Vs30, basin effects, etc. However, this relationship has the best performance in fitting and predicting the data from the Sichuan-Yunnan region.

First‐Order Mantle Subduction‐Zone Structure Effects on Ground Motion: The 2016 Mw 7.1 Iniskin and 2018 Mw 7.1 Anchorage Earthquakes

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Everett Mann ◽  
Geoffrey A. Abers
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Zone Structure ◽  
Kenai Peninsula ◽  
Ground Shaking ◽  
Intermediate Depth ◽  
First Order ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Back Arc

Abstract The 24 January 2016 Iniskin, Alaska earthquake, at Mw 7.1 and 111 km depth, is the largest intermediate‐depth earthquake felt in Alaska, with recorded accelerations reaching 0.2g near Anchorage. Ground motion from the Iniskin earthquake is underpredicted by at least an order of magnitude near Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula, and is similarly overpredicted in the back‐arc north and west of Cook Inlet. This is in strong contrast to the 30 November 2018 earthquake near Anchorage that was also Mw 7.1 but only 48 km deep. The Anchorage earthquake signals show strong distance decay and are generally well predicted by ground‐motion prediction equations. Smaller intermediate‐depth earthquakes (depth>70  km and 3<M<6.4) with hypocenters near the Iniskin mainshock show similar patterns in ground shaking as the Iniskin earthquake, indicating that the shaking pattern is due to path effects and not the source. The patterns indicate a first‐order role for mantle attenuation in the spatial variability of strong motion. In addition, along‐slab paths appear to be amplified by waveguide effects due to the subduction of crust at >1  Hz; the Anchorage and Kenai regions are particularly susceptible to this amplification due to their fore‐arc position. Both of these effects are absent in the 2018 Anchorage shaking pattern, because that earthquake is shallower and waves largely propagate in the upper‐plate crust. Basin effects are also present locally, but these effects do not explain the first‐order amplitude variations. These analyses show that intermediate‐depth earthquakes can pose a significant shaking hazard, and the pattern of shaking is strongly controlled by mantle structure.

scholarly journals Reconnaissance Report on the 31 March 2002 Earthquake on the East Coast of Taiwan

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Loh ◽  
K. C. Tsai ◽  
L. L. Chung ◽  
C. H. Yeh
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
East Coast ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Building Damage ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Typical Situation ◽  
Taipei Basin ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Motion Characteristics ◽  
Taiwan Earthquake

On 31 March 2002, an earthquake of magnitude ML=6.8 occurred in northeastern Taiwan that caused five deaths and damage to more than 300 buildings. The earthquake left some important lessons; these lessons were not considered after the 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake but must be taken into account for the management of a similar situation in the future. This article first presents the strong motion characteristics found from the ground accelerations recorded from this event. In particular, the basin effects on the distribution of ground motion intensities observed in Taipei Basin are critically reviewed. Observations of some severe building damage following the earthquakes are then summarized. The building damage modes for this event, particularly due to the basin effect, are explored in detail. The characteristics of the building disaster reflected a typical situation that can occur in cities located in high seismic risk. Finally, the collapse of the two tower cranes on, and its impact on, the Taipei Financial Center construction site are described in detail. This article presents the main lessons learned from this earthquake in the light of work performed by the research team for natural disaster from the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan.

scholarly journals Basin effects and limitations of 1D site response analysis from 2D numerical models of the Thorndon basin

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Christopher R McGann ◽  
Brendon Bradley ◽  
Liam Wotherspoon ◽  
Robin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Spectral Response ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Modelling Studies ◽  
Vertically Propagating ◽  
Propagating Shear

Plane strain (2D) finite element models are used to examine factors contributing to basin effects observed for multiple seismic events at sites in the Thorndon basin of Wellington, New Zealand. The models consider linear elastic soil and rock response when subjected to vertically-propagating shear waves. Depth-dependent shear wave velocities are considered in the soil layers, and the effects of random variations of soil velocity within layers are modelled. Various rock shear wave velocity configurations are considered to evaluate their effect on the modelled surficial response. It is shown that these simple 2D models are able to capture basin reverberations and compare more favourably to observations from strong motion recordings than conventional 1D site response models. It is also shown that consideration of a horizontal impedance contrast across the Wellington Fault affects spectral response and amplification at longer periods, suggesting the importance of this feature in future ground motion modelling studies in the Wellington region.

Observed Variation of Earthquake Motion across a Basin—Taipei City

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Hsiung Loh ◽  
Jeng-Yaw Hwang ◽  
Tzay-Chyn Shin
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Principal Direction ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Seismic Source ◽  
Spectral Ratio ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Taipei Basin ◽  
Basin Effects

Local site amplification of sedimentary deposit during earthquakes is an important issue in strong ground motion analysis. The phenomenon is more obvious for sediment basin. From the strong-motion instrumentation network of Taipei basin, the ground motion characteristics of the basin effects are studied from two seismic events: the June 5, 1994 earthquake with ML = 6.57 and the June 25, 1995 earthquake with ML = 6.50. The objective is to investigate the effects of the basin structure on the patterns of the recorded ground motions. The analyses include: (1) response spectrum and spectral ratio analyses; (2) correlation of seismic source, PGA distribution and strong-motion duration with site amplification, (3) principal direction analysis of seismic waves in the basin. The observed variations of ground motion across the basin are different from each other because of the basin effect. It means that for the Taipei basin, the basin effects for shallow sources are going to be much more significant than for the deep sources.

The ShakeOut Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Simulations

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Graves ◽  
Brad T. Aagaard ◽  
Kenneth W. Hudnut
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Peak Ground Velocity ◽  
Motion Modeling ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
San Andreas ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Simulated Ground Motions ◽  
D Model

The ShakeOut Scenario is premised upon the detailed description of a hypothetical Mw 7.8 earthquake on the southern San Andreas Fault and the associated simulated ground motions. The main features of the scenario, such as its endpoints, magnitude, and gross slip distribution, were defined through expert opinion and incorporated information from many previous studies. Slip at smaller length scales, rupture speed, and rise time were constrained using empirical relationships and experience gained from previous strong-motion modeling. Using this rupture description and a 3-D model of the crust, broadband ground motions were computed over a large region of Southern California. The largest simulated peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground velocity (PGV) generally range from 0.5 to 1.0 g and 100 to 250 cm/s, respectively, with the waveforms exhibiting strong directivity and basin effects. Use of a slip-predictable model results in a high static stress drop event and produces ground motions somewhat higher than median level predictions from NGA ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document