Multivariate genetic analysis of specific cognitive abilities in the Colorado adoption project at age 7

Intelligence ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 383-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lon R. Cardon ◽  
David W. Fulker ◽  
J.C. DeFries ◽  
Robert Plomin
2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Luciano ◽  
Margaret J. Wright ◽  
Gina M. Geffen ◽  
Laurie B. Geffen ◽  
Glen A. Smith ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebke Goertz ◽  
Ute R. Hülsheger ◽  
Günter W. Maier

General mental ability (GMA) has long been considered one of the best predictors of training success and considerably better than specific cognitive abilities (SCAs). Recently, however, researchers have provided evidence that SCAs may be of similar importance for training success, a finding supporting personnel selection based on job-related requirements. The present meta-analysis therefore seeks to assess validities of SCAs for training success in various occupations in a sample of German primary studies. Our meta-analysis (k = 72) revealed operational validities between ρ = .18 and ρ = .26 for different SCAs. Furthermore, results varied by occupational category, supporting a job-specific benefit of SCAs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krina T. Zondervan ◽  
Lon R. Cardon ◽  
Stephen H. Kennedy ◽  
Nicholas G. Martin ◽  
Susan A. Treloar

Assessment ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Karzmark

This study examined the performance characteristics of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) using comprehensive neuropsychological assessment as the criterion. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for the NCSE as a whole and for the individual subtests as measures of discrete cognitive abilities. The sample consisted of 50 consecutive outpatient referrals to the neuropsychological assessment service of a general medical hospital. Most of the patients in the sample had mild or moderate cognitive dysfunction. The sensitivity and specificity of the NCSE as a whole were .74 and .86, respectively. The sensitivity of the individual NCSE subtests was lower, ranging from .20 to .48. Specificity of subtests was high (.64 to .97). The results suggest that the operating characteristics of the NCSE depend significantly on the severity and nature of the sample assessed and the criterion used. They also indicate the need for caution in using NCSE subtest performance as a basis for concluding that specific cognitive abilities are normal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document