High Hydrostatic Pressure and High-Pressure Homogenization Processing of Fruit Juices

Fruit Juices ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 393-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro E.D. Augusto ◽  
Alline A.L. Tribst ◽  
Marcelo Cristianini
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Fruit Juices ◽  
High Pressure Homogenization

scholarly journals Emerging Non-thermal Technologies for the Extraction of Grape Anthocyanins

Antioxidants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1863
Author(s):  
Antonio Morata ◽  
Carlos Escott ◽  
Iris Loira ◽  
Carmen López ◽  
Felipe Palomero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Antioxidant Capacity ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
High Pressure Homogenization ◽  
Food Technology ◽  
Ultra High Pressure ◽  
Thermal Techniques

Anthocyanins are flavonoid pigments broadly distributed in plants with great potential to be used as food colorants due to their range of colors, innocuous nature, and positive impact on human health. However, these molecules are unstable and affected by pH changes, oxidation and high temperatures, making it very important to extract them using gentle non-thermal technologies. The use of emerging non-thermal techniques such as High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP), Ultra High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH), Pulsed Electric Fields (PEFs), Ultrasound (US), irradiation, and Pulsed Light (PL) is currently increasing for many applications in food technology. This article reviews their application, features, advantages and drawbacks in the extraction of anthocyanins from grapes. It shows how extraction can be significantly increased with many of these techniques, while decreasing extraction times and maintaining antioxidant capacity.

ChemInform Abstract: Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure and High Pressure Homogenization on the Enantioselectivity of Microbial Reductions.

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
G. FANTIN ◽  
M. FOGAGNOLO ◽  
M. E. GUERZONI ◽  
R. LANCIOTTI ◽  
A. MEDICI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Pressure Homogenization

Evaluation of Mycobacterium smegmatis as indicator of the efficacy of high hydrostatic pressure and ultra-high pressure homogenization treatments for pasteurization-like purposes in milk

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-102
Author(s):  
Rita M. Velázquez-Estrada ◽  
Tomás J. López-Pedemonte ◽  
María Manuela Hernández-Herrero ◽  
Artur Xavier Roig-Sagués
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Mycobacterium Smegmatis ◽  
Fat Content ◽  
High Pressure Homogenization ◽  
Pathogenic Species ◽  
Ultra High Pressure ◽  
Whole Milk

AbstractThe objectives of this study were: to assess the efficiency of high hydrostatic pressure or ultra-high pressure homogenization against Mycobacterium smegmatis in milk and to discuss whether M. smegmatis can be considered a suitable surrogate for other Mycobacterium spp. in high pressure inactivation trials using milk. Three strains of this specie (CECT 3017, 3020 and 3032) were independently inoculated into both skimmed (0.2% fat) and whole milk (3.4% fat) at an approximate load of 6.5 Log CFU/ml and submitted to HHP treatments at 300, 400 or 500 MPa for 10 m at 6°C and 20°C. Evolution of the surviving cells of the inoculated strains was evaluated analysing milk immediately after the treatments and after 5 and 8 d of storage at 6°C. HHP treatments at 300 MPa were seldom efficient at inactivating M. smegmatis strains, but lethality increased with pressure applied in all cases. Generation of sub-lethal injured cells was observed only after 400 MPa treatments since inactivation at 500 MPa was shown to be complete. Significant differences were not observed due to either temperature of treatment or fat content of milk, except for strain CECT3032, which was shown to be the most sensitive to HHP treatments. Milk inoculated with strain CECT3017 was submitted to ultra-high pressure homogenization (UHPH) treatments at 200, 300 and 400 MPa. Maximum reductions were obtained after 300 and 400 MPa treatments, although less than 3.50 Log CFU/ml were inactivated. UHPH did not cause significant number of injured cells. The usefulness of this species as a marker for pressure-based processing seems limited since it showed greater sensitivity than some pathogenic species including other Mycobacteria reported in previous studies.

Effect of high hydrostatic pressure and high pressure homogenization on the enantioselectivity of microbial reductions

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 2879-2887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Fantin ◽  
Marco Fogagnolo ◽  
Maria Elisabetta Guerzoni ◽  
Rosalba Lanciotti ◽  
Alessandro Medici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Pressure Homogenization

Application and possible benefits of high hydrostatic pressure or high-pressure homogenization on beer processing: A review

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 561-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lígia MR Santos ◽  
Fabiano A Oliveira ◽  
Elisa HR Ferreira ◽  
Amauri Rosenthal
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Sensory Quality ◽  
Alcoholic Beverage ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
High Pressure Processing ◽  
Sensory Characteristics ◽  
High Pressure Homogenization ◽  
Barley Malt

Beer is the most consumed beverage in the world, especially in countries such as USA, China and Brazil.It is an alcoholic beverage made from malted cereals, and the barley malt is the main ingredient, added with water, hops and yeast. High-pressure processing is a non-traditional method to preserve food and beverages. This technology has become more interesting compared to heat pasteurization, due to the minimal changes it brings to the original nutritional and sensory characteristics of the product, and it comprises two processes: high hydrostatic pressure, which is the most industrially used process, and high-pressure homogenization. The use of high pressure almost does not affect the molecules that are responsible for the aroma and taste, pigments and vitamins compared to the conventional thermal processes. Thus, the products processed by high-pressure processing have similar characteristics compared to fresh products, including beer. The aim of this paper was to review what has been investigated about beer processing using this technology regarding the effects on physicochemical, microbiology and sensory characteristics and related issues. It is organized by processing steps, since high pressure can be applied to malting, mashing, boiling, filtration and pasteurization. Therefore, the beer processed with high-pressure processing may have an extended shelf-life because this process can inactivate beer spoilage microorganisms and result in a superior sensory quality related to freshness and preservation of flavors as it does to juices that are already commercialized. However, beyond this application, high-pressure processing can modify protein structures, such as enzymes that are present in the malt, like α- and β-amylases. This process can activate enzymes to promote, for example, saccharification, or instead inactivate at the end of mashing, depending on the pressure the product is submitted, besides being capable of isomerizing hops to raise beer bitterness. As a consequence, the process may reduce steam demand and residue generation. Therefore, the use of high-pressure processing can potentially replace or be combined with heat processes usually applied to beer, thus bringing benefits to the sensory quality of the product and to the environment.

Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Salmonella Inoculated into Creamy Peanut Butter with Modified Composition

2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1664-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
TANYA D'SOUZA ◽  
MUKUND KARWE ◽  
DONALD W. SCHAFFNER
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Water Activity ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Peanut Butter ◽  
High Pressure Processing ◽  
Peanut Oil ◽  
Peanut Flour ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing

Peanut butter has been associated with several large foodborne salmonellosis outbreaks. This research investigates the potential of high hydrostatic pressure processing (HPP) for inactivation of Salmonella in peanut butter of modified composition, both by modifying its water activity as well by the addition of various amounts of nisin. A cocktail of six Salmonella strains associated with peanut butter and nut-related outbreaks was used for all experiments. Different volumes of sterile distilled water were added to peanut butter to increase water activity, and different volumes of peanut oil were added to decrease water activity. Inactivation in 12% fat, light roast, partially defatted peanut flour, and peanut oil was also quantified. Nisaplin was incorporated into peanut butter at four concentrations corresponding to 2.5, 5.0, 12.5, and 25.0 ppm of pure nisin. All samples were subjected to 600 MPa for 18 min. A steady and statistically significant increase in log reduction was seen as added moisture was increased from 50 to 90%. The color of all peanut butter samples containing added moisture contents darkened after high pressure processing. The addition of peanut oil to further lower the water activity of peanut butter further reduced the effectiveness of HPP. Just over a 1-log reduction was obtained in peanut flour, while inactivation to below detection limits (2 log CFU/g) was observed in peanut oil. Nisin alone without HPP had no effect. Recovery of Salmonella after a combined nisin and HPP treatment did show increased log reduction with longer storage times. The maximum log reduction of Salmonella achieved was 1.7 log CFU/g, which was comparable to that achieved by noncycling pressure treatment alone. High pressure processing alone or with other formulation modification, including added nisin, is not a suitable technology to manage the microbiological safety of Salmonella-contaminated peanut butter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document